[ad_1]
Lady blackmailer and honey entice Queen Archana Nag has been hitting the headlines for fairly just a few days now. Apart from the sensational revelations of her modus operandi, now, startling studies have surfaced about her academic journey and extra.
Archana’s Educational Journey
Archana, born in Lanjigad’s Kenduguda, took admission to class one on Nov 9, 2001. She continued her research on the college until 2008. However, in 2008, she introduced critical allegations of being raped by two youths. Then, police filed a case with case no- 88/2008, and each the youths had been despatched to jail. Later, the accused had been launched from jail. Following that Archana left her village and began residing together with her uncle in Kesinga the place she took admission in a non-public college (class eight).
However, she didn’t receive her Transfer Certificate (TC) from her earlier college. Hence, questions are being raised about how she received admission in one other college and continued until class 10.
Later, after finishing highschool in Kesinga, she took admission to Baikunthanath larger secondary faculty in Jaleswar. From 2014 to 2016, she continued on the faculty learning Plus II Science.
Meanwhile, Lanjigad BEO Sanjeev Nayak has affirmed that such an act of taking admission to a different college with out acquiring the TC is unlawful.
“If someone is taking admission to another school without obtaining the transfer certificate from the previous school, it is illegal. Those involved in the admission process are also a part of the illegal act as how they gave her admission without TC,” mentioned Nayak.
The Infamous Tale Continues
The notorious story of the girl blackmailer continues with the unlawful property of her father in Kesinga. Archana’s mother and father reside within the constructing positioned within the foothills of Budhadangara. However, a grievance is filed that the constructing was erected on the land owned by a tailor Hrushikesh Mahala. Archana’s father Surendra Nag forcefully eliminated Hrushikesh in 2019 and erected the constructing.
Apart from being constructed on authorities land, no official paperwork proving the authority of Nag and his possession of land is on the market. However, as nobody is at present residing within the constructing, response from Nag household couldn’t be obtained.
“I was running my shop for over 12 years. Archana’s father always created trouble for me and several times threatened me with dire consequences. A case has been registered regarding the same,” alleged Hrushikesh Mahala.
“If the work is survey-settled and it is found leasable, they can claim their possession on the land. But, for now, they can’t do so,” mentioned Sarat Chandra Sahoo, Additional Revenue Inspector, Kesinga.
Reported by Rajkumar Singhdeo (Bhawanipatna) and Atulya Bout (Bhubaneswar)
[adinserter block=”4″]
[ad_2]
Source link