News of the Emirati property firm Emaar investing in Indian-administered Kashmir has been branded a “complete betrayal” by activists and Kashmiris within the area and overseas.

Many consider Kashmir is about to satisfy a destiny much like Palestine’s, with some Arab and Islamic nations withdrawing their assist for the Muslim inhabitants’s trigger in an effort to construct higher financial and diplomatic relations with India.

In March, Emaar’s chief govt in India revealed plans to construct a shopping center and an workplace complicated in Srinagar, capital of the Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir area. Amit Jain stated that the funding price $60m would generate round 7,000 to eight,000 jobs. 

Speaking on behalf of the Indian authorities, essentially the most senior navy normal within the area, Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha, stated the announcement marked a “historic day” for Kashmir and that “business leaders from the UAE have been invited to invest in J&K and become ‘partners'”.

The Kashmir area is split between areas administered by India, Pakistan and China and has been fought over because the partition of India by the British Empire in 1947.

The Indian authorities stands accused of tons of of hundreds of gross human rights violations and extrajudicial killings within the area, with allegations of brutally suppressing a decades-long freedom battle by extraordinary Kashmiris.

Indian smooth energy

Kashmiri rights campaigner Ershad Mehmood, govt director on the Centre for Peace, Development and Reforms, based mostly in Islamabad, informed Middle East Eye: “I am in absolute shock. This is a complete betrayal of the people of Indian-occupied Kashmir and their struggle.”

“They shouldn’t have done this. This completely strengthens India’s stance, it recognises Kashmir as Indian territory and completely whitewashes our struggle,” he stated. “The UAE has just sent a message to the people of Kashmir that it doesn’t care about their rights and aspirations.”

Another campaigner, Altaf Hussain, who manages the Kashmir Institute of International Relations, stated that “the message India is trying to convey to the Kashmiris is that nobody is with you – even the UAE is investing with us. They want to project this as a negative impact on the Kashmiri struggle”.

Hussain emphasised that there was no peace in Jammu and Kashmir and that India “has on its hands a long list of human rights violations”.

Emirati funding in Indian-controlled Kashmir is an instance of Indian smooth energy and a warning to the Arab world, stated Fahim Kayani of Kashmir Campaign UK.

“India has made big inroads in Gulf nations… so now if the UAE has shown interest in investment in Kashmir it’s because of the so-called soft power of India in the Arab world,” Kayani informed MEE.

“This is a big issue not just for Muslims but for humanity, as India is ruled by an ideology that does not see non-Hindus as equals. Better the Arab world understands it sooner,” he stated.

‘Courting controversy’

Indian human rights violations in Kashmir have made worldwide funding extremely controversial.

Just after Emaar’s announcement final month, UN Special Rapporteur Mary Lawlor appealed to the Indian authorities to cease the most recent assaults on human rights activists in Jammu and Kashmir.

Referring to the current crackdown by Indian authorities on a coalition of civil society organisations, Lawlor stated: “The Jammu and Kashmir Coalition of Civil Society carries out essential work monitoring human rights. Their research and analysis of human rights violations are of huge value, including to international organisations seeking to ensure accountability and non-repetition of abuses.”

India can also be in violation of UN resolutions on holding an independence plebiscite within the area and the withdrawal of 600,000 Indian troopers at the moment based mostly in Jammu and Kashmir.

Andreas Krieg, affiliate professor in Security Studies at Kings College London, says the UAE-India relationship is deeply strategic for each nations and due to this fact courting controversy by investing in Kashmir comes with negligible reputational injury.

Amnesty accuses UK-based agency of ‘gross human rights violations’ in Kashmir

Read More »

“The UAE set a trend with moving early and recognising Israel. They thought that by the time the rest of the Arab and Muslim world comes around to recognising Israel, the UAE would have established strong relations with Israel and would act as an agent of sorts, therefore consolidating its position as a regional power. That’s what they’re doing with Kashmir and India,” Krieg stated.

“Both India and the UAE are in each other’s top three trading partners. The relationship has fast become very strategic. The UAE is advancing its interests in India through the building of relationships based on trade, investments and corporate interests.”

However, this isn’t the primary time the UAE has courted controversy over Kashmir. In August 2019, after India repealed the famed Article 370 from its structure, taking away Kashmir’s particular standing, the UAE didn’t condemn the motion. 

Kashmir’s particular standing allowed the native authorities to make its personal guidelines regarding everlasting residency, possession of property and basic rights. By taking away Kashmir’s autonomy, critics counsel, the Indian federal authorities is attempting to vary the ethnic make-up of the area.

“By allowing unchecked migration into Kashmir, the Indian government wants to change the ethnic makeup, in case there is a plebiscite in the future. The Kashmiri vote for independence from India would be greatly weakened,” stated Hussain. 

Just days after the UAE refused to sentence the choice, Abu Dhabi conferred the federal government’s highest civilian award on Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

“The UAE is fully aware that Pakistan would be unhappy with its posturing towards India, but the UAE is setting a new trend of leading the way and wants to become a middle regional power,” Krieg stated.

“It has calculated the reputational damage this will cause in the Muslim bloc and with Pakistan, but it reckons the damage will probably be minor.”

The UAE’s choice to turn out to be the primary overseas investor within the area has been met with solely a muted response from Pakistan, Pakistani-administered Kashmir and the broader Muslim bloc.

Traditionally, information of this nature would evoke automated calls of condemnation from regional and Muslim nations, with Pakistan threatening to boost the matter on the United Nations.

Middle East Eye approached each the Pakistani overseas workplace spokesperson and the president of Azad Jammu and Kashmir for remark however didn’t obtain a response by the point of publication.

MEE was informed by the secretary to the president of Pakistani-administered Kashmir that “the president is thinking about your request for a statement or an interview”.