Host Tanvi Madan and Tara Varma, a visiting fellow within the Center on the United States and Europe, open the Global India podcast mailbag to reply questions despatched in by listeners.

01:06 Tara Varma’s impression of Chinese perceptions of India

03:52 Have Chinese perceptions of India modified extra just lately?

05:19 Has India’s China coverage been characterised extra by appeasement than by pragmatism?

12:13 What would it not take for China to think about India as equal in stature?

17:38 Should the US promote F-35 fighters to India? Are India and the US participating on China’s actions in India’s neighborhood?

21:24 Why hasn’t China been in a position to cement its place as a regional hegemon, à la the US in North America?

25:53 Is the Quad (Australia, Japan, India, the US) a balancer or buck passer when it comes China?

29:17 Is a Russia-West reset attainable and is there a job for India, which doesn’t like Russia getting extra depending on China?

31:51 India, the US, and Europe’s views on China-Russia ties

34:28 Could India’s place on Taiwan evolve if there are new developments on the China-India border?

37:09 Why are China and India competing for affect vis-a-vis the Global South?

41:58 Is India making the best financial strikes to compete with China?

45:33 How do you assess the potential of future financial cooperation between India and China?

47:37 Contrasting constructive and unfavorable narratives about China: which is true?

53:25 Is there potential for a thaw in India-China ties?

58:04 Lightning Round: What is the most important delusion you hear in Europe about India-China ties?

[music]

MADAN: Welcome to Global India. I’m Tanvi Madan, a senior fellow on the Brookings Institution, the place I concentrate on Indian overseas coverage. This is the final episode of our first season, which is targeted on India’s relationship with China, and why and the way China-India ties are shaping New Delhi’s view of the world and its selections.

On this episode, we’re digging into our mailbag and will probably be answering questions on India-China relations submitted by our listeners. Thanks to these of you who submitted questions. Joining me to reply these query is a particular visitor, my colleague Tara Varma, who’s a visiting fellow within the Center on the States and Europe at Brookings, the place, amongst different issues, she researches Indo-Pacific safety points, notably from the vantage level of France and Europe extra broadly.

Welcome to the podcast, Tara.

VARMA: Hi, Tanvi. Hi, everybody. It’s nice to be right here.

MADAN: Tara, you’ve lived and labored in each India and China. What was your impression of Chinese perceptions of India?

01:06 Tara Varma’s impression of Chinese perceptions of India

VARMA: So, I lived in China ten years in the past. And I might say on the time when the world was vastly totally different and India’s place and assumptions in regards to the world had been additionally totally different. When I used to be in China, India was actually seen as a 3rd world nation, by no means on par with China. And I really feel like that notion was partly shared additionally by plenty of powers immediately. They actually didn’t view China and India in the identical method.

It was nonetheless the “El Dorado” time of China. So, there have been American firms, European firms, American and European governments actually wanting to get into the Chinese market.

I used to stay in Shanghai, and I keep in mind studying about China within the American and European press, and folks had been speaking in regards to the rise of China. But residing there, sitting there, it actually appeared like China had risen.

And I believe there was additionally this notion, I believe this misperception that we had about China, that I believe we’re paying for a bit bit now.

But there was a way, from the Chinese perspective that India was vastly totally different, extra chaotic. There was the democratic component, however that was actually portrayed in a really unfavorable method, exactly due to chaos and anarchy and issues not working effectively.

People in China actually highlighted that, you recognize, there have been infrastructures that labored, a vastly well-performing financial system, an attractivity to China that wasn’t the identical when it got here to India. They had been actually perceived in very alternative ways.

And so, after I instructed my Chinese colleagues that I might go to India for the vacations or to work, they might really warn me to watch out, to take particular care. It appeared to them like I used to be actually going into a spot, yeah, completely totally different from China with no safety. So, that was very fascinating to me. And after we mentioned it, I attempted to clarify to them what my notion of India was and the way totally different certainly the 2 had been.

But on the similar time, these had been two international locations with a inhabitants of over 1 billion individuals, economies rising. And it’s true, vastly totally different financial, political, governance techniques. But it was actually fascinating to match the 2.

MADAN: It is fascinating as a result of after I first began working at Brookings in 2003, in that mid-2000s to late-2000s interval, right here in Washington you had been beginning to hear India-China comparisons, and it had fully to do with capabilities. And we see that yo-yoing when the Indian financial system is doing effectively specifically, however I believe in that mid- to late-2000s, it was additionally in regards to the nuclear exams and the discussions after that. But additionally, India’s stronger army in some senses, its willingness to work with international locations. You did hear these comparisons. And then when there was a way of a bit little bit of a lull in not simply U.S.-India relations, however the Indian financial system, you probably did cease listening to these comparisons.

03:52 Have Chinese perceptions of India modified extra just lately?

So, I believe in some methods, I’m wondering if it’s additionally related to how India’s capabilities are seen, which is why you’re seeing a considerably totally different perspective from China now on India, not less than if Global Times is to be believed.

VARMA: And I’ll add exactly on that. One of the factors of comparability that was shared in India, China, and the West usually was on the time that China was a lot extra environment friendly. In China, you could possibly get issues finished. And that was type of a delusion additionally, as a result of while you had been residing in China, you realized there have been protests across the setting, there have been protests that had been crushed. There had been claims from the inhabitants that had been crushed. It was not really easy.

But certainly, even individuals in India on the time had been saying, effectively, look, possibly the Chinese mannequin is the one to observe the place you get infrastructure, and also you get effectivity. And so, while you mentioned, okay, however initially not every thing is environment friendly, and if this effectivity comes at the price of democracy, then that in all probability says one thing in regards to the system.

It was actually not a time the place this argument was heard in any respect. People had been China with shiny eyes and so they actually noticed it as a mannequin.

We had been nonetheless, I believe, in that delusion, additionally inspired by the West. I imply, individuals had been very smitten by what could possibly be finished in China. Not just for financial and monetary advantages, but additionally as a method for them to point out that China could possibly be turned from an authoritarian regime, a dictatorship, to not a democracy, however not less than possibly to a much less authoritarian, extra open regime. And we’ve seen how that has advanced since then.

05:19 Has India’s China coverage been characterised extra by appeasement than by pragmatism?

MADAN: With that, let’s now dive into the mailbag.

VARMA: We’ve obtained a cluster of questions, really, in regards to the adequacy of India’s balancing technique vis-à-vis China. One listener says the problem from China has solely grown and asks if India’s China coverage has been much less characterised by pragmatism than by appeasement, exhibiting, and I quote, “extraordinary sensitivity towards Beijing.” There are additionally a number of questions asking what are India’s choices?

MADAN: Tara, I believe there are two elements of this query. One is India’s previous method, of which there’s typically dialogue. And the second is on India’s choices forward. I believe in the event you take a look at that first query about “was it pragmatism or appeasement,” I believe in the event you look again, you see that just about each Indian authorities has seen China as a problem. And I might say this goes again to nearly 1949 not less than.

But what the totally different governments, together with generally throughout the course of a authorities, there’s been variations over their assessments over the character, extent, and urgency of the problem that China poses and variations on what greatest method to take. And so, you will have had questions over time about whether or not or not these assessments had been proper.

You see questions on Prime Minister Nehru and may he have gotten extra in return from China, even a border settlement for the 1954 settlement with China on Tibet and recognizing Chinese suzerainty over Tibet. So, one query is, ought to he have gotten extra from that or the query is, was he naive?

Or extra just lately, you will have questions on whether or not Prime Minister Manmohan Singh ought to haven’t seemingly gradual rolled sure balancing actions with companions such because the United States to reassure China. Or whether or not Prime Minister Narendra Modi shouldn’t have given Xi Jinping the good thing about the doubt, each in that 2014–2015 interval or in 2018-2019.

So, you hear these questions. But I believe in every case these judgments that the prime ministers made, and you may say that they had been inaccurate, however in their very own method it wasn’t about appeasement. It was an evaluation of, or the calculation of their constraints—of India’s constraints—their sense of India’s different priorities, and their theories of deterrence.

So, in lots of circumstances, every of those leaders that I discussed, however others as effectively, thought that by certainly participating with China economically, say, or settling, stabilizing Tibet concern that they thought a part of what they had been doing was deterring China by way of diplomacy, and thru having an excellent relationship with this accomplice and neighbor that India needed to grapple with so they may concentrate on Indian development and growth. So, that was a judgment name.

Now you possibly can say that they had been flawed, however then you need to assume by way of their calculations about tradeoffs and take into consideration whether or not or not different tradeoffs had been attainable. And I believe you’ve seen the talk about these tradeoffs basically in some methods be the identical since India turned unbiased, which is weapons versus butter. Do you wish to spend cash on growth versus protection? So, someone like me would say, look, I believe that calculation was flawed at first. Deterrence additionally wants not simply diplomacy however sturdy protection.

But there have been tradeoffs. If you spent that cash on protection, it could take away from growth funding. Or you see one other commerce off was the China problem or the Pakistan problem. Now we see them as linked, however basically, particularly while you had been useful resource constrained or functionality constrained, you had to determine which was your precedence problem and cope with that. And I believe at many instances, Indian policymakers have prioritized the Pakistan problem over the China problem.

And then I believe a 3rd tradeoff that leaders have typically themselves needed to cope with and battle with in some methods is the autonomy versus alignment. And I don’t say alliance, however autonomy versus alignment. Tara, you might be French and work on France. And so, you recognize about strategic autonomy. But this concept that you just don’t wish to ally. And so, when individuals mentioned, oh you recognize, India ought to have checked out this otherwise within the ‘40s and ‘50s or even in the 2000s, the question was, would India then have been willing to do the kind of things with partners that would have been perhaps asked for in return, including a much closer security relationship? And many of the people who say that India shouldn’t do these issues are additionally the individuals who criticize type of China coverage.

But once more, this comes all the way down to tradeoffs. And like I mentioned, you possibly can argue that varied policymakers have made inaccurate assumptions in regards to the timeline, you recognize, when China can be a problem. They might need had some mirror imaging, assuming that China would put aside geopolitical variations to concentrate on financial growth, similar to India was. Or you could possibly say that they made flawed assumptions in regards to the effectiveness of private diplomacy.

And I believe it’s cheap to debate these questions in regards to the selections that Indian policymakers have made. But ideally, you need to debate them to not cross judgment on these leaders, as a result of I’ve realized to be humble about considering by way of constraints that policymakers face. But considering by way of and debating these points to see what classes might be realized. How do you just remember to get this stuff proper the following time round?

Briefly, by way of the best way ahead, I really assume the contours of India’s choices are already in place. I believe the query is, ought to India be doing it at a distinct tempo and to a distinct diploma. But I believe what you’ve seen is essentially eager about a broad deterrence method by way of diplomacy, by way of agreements, and thru growing energy and partnerships.

And so, I believe it comes all the way down to, one, constructing India’s personal capabilities throughout the board. Second, a community of exterior companions that each helps construct these capabilities, but additionally shapes a positive steadiness of energy within the area.

And then I believe the query, maybe, on which there’s essentially the most debate in India, and it’s occurring proper now, is how a lot do you dialogue with China? Do you dialogue with China? And for what? To stabilize the border for disaster prevention or for one thing extra, for some kind of normalization? That’s normally the third leg. And so, I believe that’ll be essentially the most debated.

But in any other case by way of constructing capabilities and growing partnerships, I believe you’ve seen India try this. One might query, is it quick sufficient? Does it go far sufficient? But nonetheless, I believe the contours are in place.

VARMA: So, strategic autonomy in a phrase, in two phrases.

MADAN: Autonomy, but additionally accompanied by alignment. I don’t assume autonomy and alignment are mutually unique. I really assume over time, alignment on shared pursuits might really assist India construct that autonomy over time as France has finished over the course of its historical past.

12:13 What would it not take for China to think about India as equal in stature?

One different query that’s associated to this capabilities, balancing query, this broad concern of how China sees India or what may deter it. Related to that, we’ve received a query from a listener, Omkar, who asks, what would it not take for China to think about India as equal in stature?

VARMA: I believe the constructing of alliances, partnerships, particular relationships, let’s say, is a part of it. I don’t know if China can overcome actually the underlying sense that India will at all times be weaker. I actually assume that’s one thing that’s constructed within the Chinese political system. The 1962 army defeat can be very current of their thoughts. They’ve seen India try to construct extra capabilities and develop new relationships.

But there’s a sense for China, and I might say, notably since Xi Jinping, that it’s meant to be by itself, it’s making the world extra depending on China whereas making China much less depending on the world. And I believe basically, it believes that you might want to be by yourself to have the ability to defend your self. And I don’t assume it sees India as being able to it.

It’s developments that India is doing and the particular place that India is taking on the earth proper now very acutely. It doesn’t escape the Chinese eye that India needs to take extra place, whether or not it’s with the Global South or with the Global North, really. I believe that’s very clear in China’s thoughts. And you see all these op-eds, within the Global Times and People’s Daily each time, there may be some type of a constructive protection of what India is doing, it’s instantly run down, turned down within the Chinese official press. And I believe there’s a sense to that as a result of any concept that folks might have that China and India could possibly be on par is de facto one thing that Beijing needs to downplay as a lot as attainable.

The actuality of the matter is immediately, the world continues to be very a lot depending on China’s worth chains and provide chains. Many firms within the U.S. and Europe are eager about how they may change elements of their dependency on China to India, as a result of India is extra democratic. It’s a particular accomplice. It is sensible to put money into it within the years to return. Most of the financial development goes to return from that area. Population is younger, it’s well-educated now. So, you see numerous constructive perspective popping out of India.

But it’s not really easy to vary 25 years of funding. The panorama of infrastructure between China and India is vastly totally different. India has gone in a method already to the Fourth Industrial Revolution, not likely doing the second and the third, not less than not pushing it as a lot as attainable. And there’s loads that you are able to do within the digital world.

But for development to occur, you want factories, you want individuals, you might want to prepare the individuals who will probably be working within the factories, and you might want to procure the crucial uncooked supplies, the crucial supplies, to get these factories working. For this, you want exhausting infrastructure. India doesn’t have to copy every thing that China did. We’re in a distinct world now, so India must discover its solution to do it. I’m undecided that we will simply say, effectively, you recognize, let’s simply hand over on China and change to India. Materially, virtually, I don’t assume that’s attainable. And additionally, there are nonetheless numerous firms who don’t wish to hand over on China.

So, we see a little bit of a discrepancy right here between official governmental insurance policies and declarations and the truth on the bottom from the businesses’ aspect who’re saying, effectively, in the interim, it could value us way more to depart China and to go to India the place it could be one other degree of funding. And we’re not saying we received’t make this choice, however we’ll make it mainly after we may have no different selection.

And so, I believe, individuals in China are additionally following these developments, and so they see this discrepancy between the coverage world and the financial world. And they’re relying on it a bit bit, as a result of inside China, you see additionally a really sophisticated financial scenario. Major monetary, actual property firms are simply crashing fully. There are many questions on what to do with the overproduction that China used to export very simply. And what we’re seeing now with not decoupling anymore, however the de-risking methods which can be adopted by plenty of governments, they’re going to play towards China’s hand.

So, China is all of this. I believe it’s aware of those headwinds which can be transferring in direction of India. But I actually don’t see it as perceiving India to be equal to it in the interim. That may change, however I believe there’s something there that received’t change for the time.

MADAN: I keep in mind Professor Susan Shirk a few years in the past wrote in regards to the asymmetry in how India and China see one another. Where for China, it’s distant, it didn’t actually determine as a lot. But for India it loomed actually massive. And as you mentioned, the 1962 struggle for India looms a lot bigger. But in the event you went to the PLA museum, the People’s Liberation Army Museum, in Beijing, I don’t know what the scenario is immediately, however after I visited it, you noticed main shows for what had been referred to as the so-called “wars of aggression” by different powers. So, there was a struggle of aggression by the U.S., which was the Korean War, the struggle of aggression by the Soviets, the struggle of aggression by the Japanese. I used to be wanting round for the quote unquote, “war of aggression by India” exhibit, and also you couldn’t actually discover it as a result of someone instructed me it was up on one other ground, and it was a tiny exhibit as a result of it didn’t loom as massive.

So, I believe, as you mentioned, there may be this distinction. I believe clearly it’s modified; India might be extra within the thoughts area than it was when Professor Shirk wrote about this, however nonetheless nonetheless seen from a distinct view than India sees China.

17:38 Should the US promote F-35 fighters to India? Are India and the US participating on China’s actions in India’s neighborhood?

VARMA: We’ve additionally had a few questions in regards to the U.S. One is whether or not, given studies of China offering Pakistan stealth fighters, shouldn’t the U.S. contemplate promoting F-35s to India? Another from Ashok is, are India and the U.S. participating on China’s rising actions in India’s neighborhood?

MADAN: With the F-35 query, I want that I might telephone a pal, one in every of our company, maybe, who’ve been on the present, Joshua White, Raji Rajagopalan, or Walter Ladwig, who work on this way more carefully. I’ll simply say that it’s not clear, for instance, that India essentially needs F-35s, both due to the price or as a result of India intends to have its personal indigenous possibility. But it would sooner or later, relying on a way of urgency, et cetera. That would require India to make sure selections with regard to, for instance, the Russian tools it has or different choices to make this a extra palatable supply for the U.S. to make. In the meantime, you do have plenty of different allies and companions who do need, way more readily need, that plane.

So, I believe that’s a query that will probably be debated for some time, however it could require the type of selections it’s not clear that India both needs to or might make at this stage or within the close to time period.

On the query of India’s neighborhood and are India and the U.S. participating. Yes, they’re. This is the one place the rising depth of the China problem has modified how India sees not simply the actions of the U.S. however different like-minded companions like Japan, Australia, Britain, France, in South Asia. I believe there was a conventional sense, as you recognize, of a little bit of a what within the U.S. would consider the Monroe Doctrine, which is that is our neighborhood and different exterior powers ought to basically keep out.

I believe what you’ve seen now could be China’s actions and affect have grown in South Asia, not simply in Pakistan, however throughout the board in each one in every of India’s close to neighborhood. You’ve seen India change its angle in direction of these different companions and saying, look, India is not has a monopoly, it’s a extra aggressive area, as one in every of our different company, Constantino Xavier, has identified. And due to this fact, whereas it could actually present some options, it can’t essentially match the size or the velocity of what China is doing. And so, it’s grow to be extra open to partnership.

So, you’ve seen this on the financial aspect with, for instance, India facilitating the U.S. Millennium Challenge Corporation compact with Nepal. You’ve seen India welcoming the U.S.-Maldives protection settlement from a couple of years in the past, which might have been unheard of some years earlier than that. Or you’ve seen extra just lately the Development Finance Corporation from the U.S. finance a port growth venture in Sri Lanka that will probably be undertaken by an Indian firm.

And so, you’re seeing these ways in which I believe are totally different and a departure from the previous. This doesn’t imply that India and the U.S. agree on the neighborhood. I believe there’s been a good bit of debate on, for instance, the variations between India and the U.S. on Bangladesh and the latest elections there. Nonetheless, I believe what you’ve seen is the 2 international locations be keen to handle these variations and seek the advice of with one another. So, there are these type of regional consultations now.

I believe the opposite factor to look at is not only India-U.S. consultations and coordination, possibly even collaboration in India’s speedy neighborhood, however in its prolonged neighborhood. So, within the Middle East, or what India calls West Asia, or Southeast Asia, or the Indian Ocean area extra broadly. And I believe you’ve seen the announcement of an Indian Ocean dialogue. It’ll be fascinating to see the place that goes within the months and years forward.

21:24 Why hasn’t China been in a position to cement its place as a regional hegemon, à la the US in North America?

While we’re speaking in regards to the area, we’ve additionally had a query flipping the regional dominance query round from Yudhishtir, who asks, how come China hasn’t been in a position to cement its place as a, quote, “regional hegemon, like the U.S. in North America?” And he asks, is it due to geography? Effective balancing by different actors? Tara, what’s your view?

VARMA: So, China is the highest buying and selling accomplice of many of the international locations within the area. It’s really the highest buying and selling accomplice of 120 international locations on the earth. So, it’s developed a method of some type of an financial dominance or not less than interdependency. But it has additionally gone to struggle with India. It’s gone to struggle with Vietnam. It’s seen as a coercive actor.

And so, I believe international locations within the area, after they say, whereas speaking about Indo-Pacific methods, that they don’t wish to be compelled to decide on, it truly is about that. It’s that they’ll’t afford actually to show away from China. But on the similar time, they know that what China is aspiring to or is offering them as a mannequin isn’t one thing that they adhere to fully. And so, we’re on this scenario the place everyone seems to be balancing. I believe that’s the complexity of the world that we’re seeing now.

And I might say, notably since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine two years in the past, we’re seeing a number of layers of complexity. It’s not only a zero-sum sport. It’s not as a result of different companions or international locations are rising stronger, that some are rising weaker. It’s simply that everybody concurrently is rising stronger.

And so, what we’re seeing about China is that it is usually being confronted to this. I believe it had hoped to grow to be not likely a regional hegemon. China aspires to be a world hegemon. And I believe that’s additionally the truth. And we’re seeing this being asserted in official paperwork, world safety initiatives, world growth initiatives, after all, the Belt and Road Initiative, which has existed now for the previous ten years.

We do not know what the true figures across the Belt and Road are. At the very starting of the initiative. It was mentioned that the entire finances of it, loans and grants, can be round $900 billion. I don’t know if that’s true. There are some methods to trace concretely whether or not a few of the roads and ports and highways have really been constructed, however to know whether or not these had been grants or mortgage, as soon as once more, we don’t actually know.

The debt query across the BRI, the Belt and Road Initiative, is a big one. And I believe plenty of companions and international locations within the area to China have additionally … they’ve come again from their enthusiasm of it. Because it’s true that initially China’s proposition was very interesting. We’re coming to you with loans and grants that will help you construct your nation, construct concrete infrastructure, contribute to financial development, present jobs to your inhabitants. And opposite to the U.S. and Europe, we’ll ask for nothing in return. There’ll be no post-colonial agenda. We received’t be asking for us to share values. We’re simply making you a enterprise proposition that’s mutually useful. And it’s what they referred to as a win-win scenario.

I believe what we’ve seen right here once more is that that’s not at all times true. Some of the conditional loans, notably in some international locations in Africa, have been not possible to reimburse for international locations within the area. And there’s an enormous query about whether or not the CCP and the Chinese authorities knew this from the beginning. And so, what they’ve been doing is “agreeing,” in quotes, to cancel the money owed in change for some crucial infrastructure that the nation would give them. One instance that I take into consideration is Djibouti, the place they now have a army base. They’ve been doing this little by little in plenty of international locations. So, there’s a true technique there.

Once once more, within the area, international locations see that. They’re lucid about it. They’re not naive. But they are saying themselves, we will’t afford to show our again on China. We can’t afford to show it away. It wouldn’t make sense for us. We should stay on this world the place we’re working with China. We’re working with the U.S. We’re working with India. We’re working with the ASEAN. We’re desirous about what the Europeans have to supply from an financial standpoint. And we have now to stay with all of this, which I believe can be high quality. It’s simply the truth of the scenario.

I believe it’s a lot more durable for us within the West as a result of we did assume for a very long time of issues as only a zero-sum sport. I believe we have now to take a look at all these a number of, complicated layers and perceive and assess what are the pursuits of all of our companions. And if we push them to decide on, I’m afraid they won’t select us.

25:53 Is the Quad (Australia, Japan, India, the US) a balancer or buck passer when it comes China?

In phrases of balancing, once more, there’s a query about one other key phrase right here, which is the Quad. Noting that that grouping of Australia, India, Japan and the U.S. has raised China’s hackles, one listener, Praveer, asks, given the largely unstructured—for instance, it doesn’t have a secretariat—and nonmilitary, not less than not overtly, nature of the Quad, is it proper to imagine that Quad is supposed to steadiness China? Moreover, even whether it is to some extent meant to steadiness China, isn’t the balancing habits of Quad members extra of a buck passing? Unquote.

MADAN: I believe I might really say that the Quad isn’t about buck passing, it’s about burden sharing. And it’s about 4 international locations, 4 maritime democracies who do have a shared imaginative and prescient of the Indo-Pacific. Want to see the rules-based order prevail. Want to see international locations having the liberty to decide on. And 4 international locations which have considerations, and shared considerations, although not an identical considerations, about what poses a problem to that imaginative and prescient of the area.

It’s not the one problem, however they do see, I believe, one of many major challenges as a rising China’s assertive habits. So, it’s not nearly China’s rise, its capabilities, however the best way it’s been behaving by way of coercion, and potential battle within the area.

So, I believe you will have 4 international locations who’ve this shared imaginative and prescient, have a shared sense of the problem, and likewise all acknowledge that nobody nation can or needs to cope with that problem by itself.

And so, I believe what you’ve seen the Quad attempt to do is have two traces of effort. One is an entire set of actions round shaping a positive steadiness of energy within the area, which contributes to deterrence, shapes China’s calculations.

But I believe there needs to be an understanding the Quad alone can’t do that. So, it’s a part of a community of alliances, coalitions and partnerships that’s shaping that favorable steadiness of energy. And due to this fact, tries to form China’s calculations.

I believe the second line of effort is constructing resilience within the area, whether or not that’s by way of international locations’ capacities for maritime safety, whether or not that’s within the well being area or the local weather area. The concept being for international locations to have the ability to have a capability to detect challenges, deny these challenges, in addition to have the capability to reply to challenges that emerge.

So, I believe what that is, is these 4 international locations realizing that it is sensible for international locations in a useful resource constrained setting to attempt to share that burden, since they do share a imaginative and prescient, the sense of problem, and the concept it’s not price doing alone.

So, don’t consider the type of European model collective protection of the Cold War method, however consider collaborative safety as what the Quad is attempting to do throughout the board. As the Quad says, it’s a pressure for public good. So, well being safety, local weather safety, maritime safety by way of combating unlawful and unreported fishing as effectively.

29:17 Is a Russia-West reset attainable and is there a job for India, which doesn’t like Russia getting extra depending on China?

Now, we have now yet one more query on the balancing technique entrance, this time from the mysterious Mr. A, associated to India’s balancing technique vis-à-vis China that historically included a job for Russia, which is now partnering with Beijing. It follows up on our episode with Nivedita Kapoor on India’s view of China-Russia ties. And the listener asks, Will India be capable of re-accommodate Russia with the Western world within the medium- to long- time period? Tara, is such a Russia-West reset attainable and is there a job to play for India which needs to stall or reverse deepening Sino-Russian ties?

VARMA: This is the query of the second. We have really a collection of essays arising with colleagues from Brookings about the way forward for the help to Ukraine, what Europe and the West can do to assist it. But there are questions on Russia in there, too. And proper now, to be trustworthy, a reset appears not attainable. For Europe, the destiny of Ukraine is de facto now tied to its future.

And so, if there’s a termination to the struggle that’s in favorable phrases to Ukraine and that ensures its safety for the long run, I believe that will probably be time, then, to consider the way forward for the connection to Russia, as a result of plenty of international locations, together with my very own, say that you could’t change geography. Russia is at all times going to be there. On the fence, inside, exterior Europe. And so, we have now to discover a solution to work with it.

Right now, truthfully, most European international locations actually see Russia because the long-term enemy, the long-term adversary. It has had brazen attitudes in Ukraine. It’s been destroying the nation for the previous two years, destroying the infrastructure, concentrating on civilian populations. Putin has mentioned and alluded to not so vaguely about the truth that it he might transcend Ukraine, he might go possibly to NATO member states. And the declarations a couple of days in the past by former President Donald Trump about the truth that he would really encourage Putin to invade European international locations in the event that they weren’t paying up on protection, I believe has actually despatched chills to everybody in Europe just lately.

And so, in the event you take heed to Putin, he says the struggle can finish if Ukraine totally capitulates after which we’ll agree to barter. I believe, that’s positively not possible for us. And so, we’re additionally speaking with a rustic in entrance of us that manifestly doesn’t need some type of a cooperation or a reset. I’m not saying it’s by no means going to occur, however it is rather sophisticated.

31:51 India, the US, and Europe’s views on China-Russia ties

Where I see a shared curiosity for Europeans and Americans and India is certainly in eager to stall deepening Sino-Russian ties. And I might say within the European case specifically, as a result of Europe has been pretty scared by plenty of American declarations on China, I might say, notably final yr with the balloon incident, and the acceleration of tensions. We noticed a second the place struggle with China was really evoked right here in Washington pretty overtly, in a method that it’s completely not in Europe.

And Europe doesn’t wish to hand over completely on its financial and commerce relationship with China. But it positively sees now these deepening Sino-Russian ties as having horrible penalties on its relationship with China.

So, I believe that is one space the place if India wished to behave extra, wished to be extra open, I believe there can be area for Europeans to need that, as a result of India is certainly on this very distinctive place the place it feels prefer it’s equidistant with Europe, the U.S., and Russia in a method that no different nation is on the earth proper now. And it appears that evidently from the skin not less than, that it has this entry nearly in an equal method. So, if there was a method through which Modi or the Indian authorities might lean on Putin, I believe that might positively be useful.

I believe India additionally must be lifelike about the truth that in the interim, Europe won’t hand over on the China relationship. One of the key European international locations, Germany, an important financial energy, depends totally on its exports to China. And so, I don’t see it giving up. Its already given up on its dependency on Russian oil prior to now two years. If it provides up on the financial relationship with China, then it significantly places its financial may in danger. And in a method, the centrality of Germany within the European system can be linked to its financial may. So, if all of the sudden Germany isn’t so central economically, it would lose a few of its centrality in political phrases. And that additionally completely modifications the steadiness of energy in Europe.

So, all this stuff have penalties and ramifications. But I believe we have now a shared curiosity in stalling these deepening Sino-Russian ties. Though I’ve to be trustworthy, if I take a look at the information, analyze what we’re seeing, we’re an more and more remoted Russia counting certainly on China, on Iran, on North Korea. This doesn’t look like a rustic that wishes to discover a method out of this example with companions. So, I’m not saying that we must always completely hand over. Diplomacy ought to do what it’s purported to do, however it does appear that we’re at a little bit of an deadlock proper now.

34:28 Could India’s place on Taiwan evolve if there are new developments on the China-India border?

From European situations to Indo-Pacific ones, we have now a query from listener Veyd, which is, might India’s place on Taiwan evolve if there are extra developments on the Sino-Indian border?

MADAN: We spoke a bit bit about this on our episode on Tibet and Taiwan with our colleague Ryan Haas. I believe you’ve already seen India’s place on Taiwan evolve in not less than two methods since China-India ties have deteriorated. One is that it has grow to be considerably much less cautious about commenting on or speaking about Taiwan on the whole. And even by way of, as I’d talked about in that episode, Indian ministers showing at Taiwanese firms’ inaugurations in India, or Taiwan simply changing into a extra seen each actor and getting much more protection in India. So, way more Taiwan consciousness in India and in Indian authorities. But additionally due to developments in the previous couple of years across the Taiwan Strait has been a bit extra vocal on the problem, even when not as vocal as some would love.

But I believe the second method you’ve seen India’s place vis-à-vis Taiwan evolve because of its considerations about China, is on the de-risking entrance. So, you’ve seen India wish to de-risk its financial system. And a part of that’s doing it by way of diversification but additionally indigenization. And so, this concept of encouraging not simply Western firms to return put money into India, but additionally Taiwanese ones. And so, I believe you’ve seen this each within the pc area, in addition to within the telephone area. And so, electronics extra broadly, the place you’ve seen Taiwanese firms present renewed curiosity in India.

So, I believe you’ve already seen how developments on the border have a direct line to how India sees these points. But I believe sooner or later, you too can see developments on the border enjoying a job. How and in what course depends upon the context. If there’s one other escalation by China on the border, you could possibly see it cement these tendencies. And India’s competitors with China additional make it way more open about the place it stands on these points, maintaining in thoughts that China stays an Indian neighbor.

But alternatively, you could possibly argue that if there may be an escalation on the border, it might additionally take up extra of India’s assets and a spotlight. So, I believe it depends upon the circumstances. It additionally depends upon who’s in energy on the time and what their judgments are on the identical set of details, for instance, about what can be useful by way of tackling their problem on the border.

37:09 Why are China and India competing for affect vis-a-vis the Global South?

Tara, we’ve been speaking a good bit in regards to the Indo-Pacific, however wanting past the area, listener Nivan has requested, why are each China and India racing to courtroom the Global South. Except for ethical good points, he asks, what does the Global South have to supply? And between China and India, is there a frontrunner?

VARMA: We alluded to earlier in our dialogue to this fragmentation of the world and the truth that international locations don’t wish to select. We’re not in a bipolar world anymore. We’re not in a tri-polar world the place—some individuals in Europe actually don’t like that after we say it, however we’re someway in a multipolar world, not less than international locations don’t wish to select.

And so, India and China are racing to the Global South, I believe, as a result of they notice that plenty of international locations will wish to work with India, the U.S., Europe, Russia, Indonesia. They won’t wish to select. They’ll see the place their pursuits lie and what proposition, what supply might be made to them.

And so, for me, really the proposition goes method past ethical good points. I believe there’s a real financial, commerce curiosity right here. Sometimes a safety curiosity, possibly a holistic view of safety. If you multiply companions, then you definitely’re much less in danger all of the sudden of failing on the dependency on one in every of them. But additionally, you probably have a multiplicity of them, then one in every of them may be much less keen to assault you. So, I believe there may be additionally a way that you just defend your self by speaking to and dealing with plenty of companions.

Still a way in the best way that financial interdependency works. We know the vulnerabilities linked to it. And we all know what risks they could signify. But on the similar time, energy is available in numbers. And so, I believe each India and China are very aware of that, and so they see alternatives there.

I believe China has made a clearer proposition. The BRI is a kind of examples, very concrete ones. People within the Global South know that they arrive with caveats. The Chinese proposition isn’t good, however it has the benefit of being laid out.

And so, the truth of the scenario—and that goes past the Global South—is that China has a stake now in additional than 60 ports on the earth. They don’t management it totally, however they’ve stakes mainly in main maritime routes, in main commerce routes. And we’ve seen how that impacts China. China at a second when the Red Sea was actually below numerous stress a couple of weeks in the past, it didn’t act as a lot because it might have on the worldwide stage, however it did react and say one thing. And so, you could possibly see that China additionally identifies very clearly when its pursuits are at dangers.

I believe India has but to make that proposition. Last yr, Prime Minister Narendra Modi mentioned he wished India to be one of many voices of the Global South. In a method, that’s additionally a proposition, to say there’s not one Global South. There are a multiplicity of voices. India might be one among many. It can deliver or carry others with it. But I believe that’s already, after all, a really totally different message.

The query is, can India make a concrete proposition in relation to infrastructure and financial good points? Because I believe that’s nonetheless what persons are in search of. I believe the Chinese proposition is on the market. We know that it’s not totally environment friendly, however not less than it’s clearer. I believe India nonetheless has to make a case.

Between them, is there a frontrunner? Again, I believe as a result of the Chinese proposition is clearer, plenty of international locations wish to go. But additionally they don’t wish to have to decide on between India and China. I believe we’re additionally attending to that stage the place the query that we get from numerous companions is, why would we have now to decide on? There is one proposition from China the place we’d get all of those supplies, all of those roads. And there’s one proposition with India, which has now a bigger voice on the worldwide stage. And if all of the sudden we’re supported by India to be a nonpermanent member of the UN Security Council or to be extra lively on the worldwide stage, effectively, that helps us. And why would they be mutually unique?

I believe that India has in all probability a card to play right here too, simply to say, effectively, this isn’t about selecting. It’s about making the perfect of every of those propositions for everybody. I believe what is obvious is that for now, neither the U.S. nor Europe have made an excellent supply to the Global South, an excellent concrete supply.

One small a part of it’s, is the IMEC, which was proposed on the G20 in Delhi final yr. So, that’s the India, Middle East, Europe Economic Corridor, which is, meant to hyperlink India, the Middle East, Europe by way of connectivity. I believe in a method clearly an alternative choice to the BRI. But we have now but to see what funding comes from that, how concretely they’re going to do it. The concrete proposition wants to return out of it. And additionally, we see now with developments within the Middle East, that it’s not really easy to make it come to fruition. So, I believe there may be nonetheless a bit extra work to do on our aspect.

MADAN: And after all, there are issues India can supply, not simply alone, however in locations like Africa, which one in every of our listeners, Tamiru, requested about, with companions, together with European companions, American companions, Japanese, and others who’re additionally eager about providing options in that area specifically.

41:58 Is India making the best financial strikes to compete with China?

VARMA: We’ve additionally obtained two sorts of questions within the financial area, however on the bilateral entrance this time. The first cluster entails, Is India making the best strikes to compete with China, notably on the manufacturing fronts? And do a few of its initiatives make extra sense strategically than economically?

MADAN: So, I believe there’s little doubt {that a} strategic prism is now shaping India’s financial and technology-related selections, however not simply India’s selections. I believe that’s the actuality immediately, and it could actually’t be wished away, is that a number of international locations at the moment are eager about these points as strategic selections. This is one thing, in reality, China pioneered on this period. Essentially it was decoupling whereas others had been nonetheless speaking about interdependence.

But I believe you’ve additionally seen different international locations now seeing these as strategic selections, as a result of it’s one thing that Beijing’s habits has introduced on, one thing you alluded to earlier: its financial coercion or use of its financial levers to form nation’s strategic and political selections has meant that international locations like India see financial ties with China now way more as a vulnerability than as a possibility, which they did prior to now. So, I believe there isn’t a doubt that these at the moment are not simply financial selections, however strategic selections. And I believe that can stay the case.

I believe on the query of what India’s method has been extra broadly, I believe you’ve seen basically India’s financial safety method contain three prongs. One is limiting Chinese entry to sure strategic sectors. The second is indigenization or reshoring. And the third is diversification or friendshoring. And I believe you see this play out within the manufacturing area as effectively. I do know there are some who say India shouldn’t even be getting concerned in rising manufacturing. I don’t assume that’s tenable for India. And I don’t assume it’s type of politically or from a political financial system perspective tenable as effectively.

So, I believe you will have seen in that indigenization prong and within the diversification prong, you’ve seen the Indian authorities take some steps on the manufacturing entrance to attempt to appeal to investments, arrange these production-linked incentive schemes. There’s some debate about how efficient they’re. I believe some sectors have been simpler than others. And so, you’ve seen India additionally attempting to construct resilience on this area, attempt to appeal to or grow to be a part of world worth chains in sure sectors.

And I believe you’ve seen the Modi authorities attempt to put money into and construct on what its predecessors did by way of infrastructure and logistics to make it extra engaging. Also signed some financial agreements or begin renegotiating them, which had been stalled earlier, to attempt to overcome a few of the commerce boundaries which have existed.

Having mentioned that, I do assume India might do extra on this manufacturing area. Broader enhancements within the enterprise setting would assist. I believe a modified angle in direction of imports, not simply seeing exports nearly as good and imports are dangerous however recognizing the connection between them.

And I believe additionally offering extra regulatory certainty to firms who today do produce other locations to put money into. And so, some may say, you recognize, India is the one possibility. That’s not essentially the case. And I believe extra broadly what I might argue is that India shouldn’t simply be making the proposition that it’s the non-China, however that India needs to be making the efficient case that India is price investing in or buying and selling with or partnering with as a result of it’s India. And that that proposition itself is engaging.

45:33 How do you assess the potential of future financial cooperation between India and China?

VARMA: The second type of bilateral financial query we’ve obtained is definitely from the other perspective. Jörn notes that the PRC and Chinese firms will probably be essential for the longer term rise of India, and asks, how do you assess the potential of future financial cooperation between the 2 states?

MADAN: For the explanations I discussed, India will proceed to look with skepticism at massively rising financial ties with China. Even earlier than the 2020 border disaster that we’ve talked about loads this season, as our visitor Ashok Malik identified, and our company on the know-how episodes, Trisha Ray and Pranay Kotasthane identified, India was involved in regards to the imbalance in ties between the 2 international locations.

And so, you could possibly see, as an illustration, that if the 2 international locations discover a solution to stabilize the scenario on the border, you could possibly see an India that’s extra open to Chinese funding or initiatives in non-strategic sectors, however not in any sectors that India considers crucial. And I believe that is going to be notably true within the know-how or telecommunications area.

And I believe you will note possibly some changes, partly due to India’s effort to draw funding from different international locations, extra like-minded international locations. You may see India make some changes by way of permitting sure sorts of imports from China or sure sorts of coaching personnel from China to return assist construct capability in India. And you’re already seeing some shift there, some openness. But that’s from a realistic perspective.

I don’t assume you’re going to return to the times of, not less than within the close to time period, and even medium time period, of India actually seeing China as an financial accomplice, to construct its future. I believe you’ll see some improve maybe in imports from China within the close to time period. But I believe slowly you will note the proportion of imports from China as a proportion of India’s whole imports doubtlessly fall over time. And I believe you’ll see the content material of these imports change.

47:37 Contrasting constructive and unfavorable narratives about China: which is true?

Now a considerably associated constructive tendencies or cooperation query we’ve obtained is from listener Debasmit, who says they’ve, quote, “observed positive aspects of China from many Indian vloggers showcasing world-class infrastructure and happy citizens. Yet contrasting narratives suggest government oppression. Could you please shed light on the reality?” Unquote. And relatedly, one other query that we’ve received from a listener has been on how one can find out about Chinese views since one normally hears much more about Indian and Western views. Tara?

VARMA: That’s a tough query. These are exhausting questions, really. So, as I mentioned, it’s true that there are lots of people in India, not very just lately, however a couple of years in the past, who would say, effectively, one thing needs to be mentioned for the effectivity of the Chinese system, the Chinese financial system, the attractiveness of it, exactly as a result of there have been all these infrastructures.

What we’re seeing now could be that China has performed a bit an excessive amount of into the infrastructure hand. And so, we’re seeing actual property firms actually crumble. We’re seeing plenty of infrastructure that had been constructed. And notably I’m considering of excessive rises, buildings that folks paid for that can by no means totally be constructed now, that won’t be given to the individuals who paid for it. Part of the financial system is de facto being severely hit in China by this.

And pleased residents? This puzzles me a bit extra. I can see the infrastructure concern, I believe there’s a level in that. There had been bullet trains in China a very long time in the past. Happy residents I imagine a bit much less as a result of I believe China actually has been an authoritarian regime for a very long time. And below Xi Jinping we’ve seen this authoritarian flip really go to the more severe. And plenty of Chinese students now say overtly that China is a dictatorship. So, no capability to protest on the residents’ aspect. Quite a lot of management coming from the propaganda machine by way of the knowledge that’s going into China—everyone knows in regards to the web firewall—numerous management of what’s given to Chinese residents by way of data.

We’ve seen the zero-COVID coverage additionally. I believe we’ve seen a really, very harsh Chinese authorities implement very harsh insurance policies by itself residents. Blocking entry, forcing them to take COVID exams each day, not letting them journey as they need contained in the nation. We’ve seen if residents will not be behaving accurately, they get punished for it. So, in the event that they don’t get correct factors on the social system, then they’re not allowed to journey as they need. They can’t go overseas. The degree of management on the inhabitants is large.

So, I’m a bit … I’m sure there are people who find themselves pleased in China, however the concept there are pleased residents and that that’s the truth, I’m much more skeptical on. And I believe it’s additionally very harmful to propagate that message as a result of it’s false. And it’s extraordinarily exhausting for students engaged on China to go in China proper now. It’s extraordinarily exhausting for them to really do discipline work and to have the ability to mirror and to inform the remainder of the world what is going on. This is one thing that has been determined very consciously by the Chinese authorities.

Once once more, the concept of for Xi Jinping is de facto to make the world depending on China whereas making China unbiased of the world. And so, we have to perceive that.

This is to not say that you might want to write China off, however I believe you might want to be aware and lucid and perceive what the scenario is on the bottom. Chinese coercion is a actuality. I imply, we’ve seen it. Australia was one in every of China’s largest buying and selling companions. Because it requested for an investigation on the origins of the COVID virus, all of the sudden there was a ban on plenty of merchandise that Australia wanted from China. And it was from in the future to a different very harsh conditions.

China frequently opens up these controversies on the borders. And so, final summer time it launched a map the place Arunachal Pradesh all of the sudden was a part of China. But really, the Philippines and Malaysia additionally contested that. So, we see a authorities that I assume is not only coming with good intentions.

I believe the query in regards to the Chinese views is de facto, actually vital. And numerous Chinese students have additionally not been in a position to come to America and Europe. And I do know that there are a selection of assume tanks and organizations now really working to get some Chinese students to return right here to resume contacts, not less than people-to-people exchanges, as a result of these are completely essential.

I might say simply on the human degree they’re vital. But in the event you consider the function that China performs on the worldwide stage, and clearly that ambition to play much more, we have to perceive these views. We get a few of the Chinese journals, we learn them, however I believe the people-to-people contact are actually essential. And they’re much more essential at a time the place really the management on individuals coming from the federal government aspect is rising day-by-day.

We’ve reached with China a state that has instituted state capitalism and digital management, nearly full digital management of its inhabitants. So, it’s going to be exhausting. But we positively want these Chinese views, and we want to have the ability to present them with our personal views in as pacified method as attainable.

MADAN: And I believe you’ve seen efforts within the U.S., not less than, that I’m conscious of, of those type of nice translation initiatives, which is taking the writings that we do have which can be in Mandarin and translating them. So, you get a wider entry. Of course, there’s an issue that some information has been made now inaccessible from exterior.

But I might encourage efforts like that in India in the event that they don’t exist already, both alone or at the side of different like-minded companions, the place you’ll find methods to pool in these assets. There’s some nice newsletters now in India from China watchers which can be additionally price subscribing to. And so, I believe you do see that there are methods. But after all, for the explanations you mentioned, a extra closed society than even it was 5, ten years in the past, makes that effort more durable.

53:25 Is there potential for a thaw in India-China ties?

VARMA: Finally, we’ve obtained a cluster of questions on the potential for a thaw in India-China ties. Might there be a mutually agreed cooldown to the present face off? Sidhant, as an illustration, asks how can each states construct belief and mutual understanding? And there’s additionally a query, will they ever resolve their (India and China) border dispute?

MADAN: So, I believe the decision of the border dispute is a few methods away. But let me deal with that thaw query or the cooldown query. And the explanation I’m going to deal with this, and it’s maybe an excellent query in direction of the top of this episode, as a result of it’s a query I get essentially the most within the U.S. today, which is, are China and India going to achieve some kind of grand discount or settlement?

I believe what you could possibly see is a few kind of settle down within the sense of what the U.S. and Australia and others are doing, which is a stabilization effort to set a ground within the relationship, to make sure that you don’t see a disaster escalation once more. But that might require one of many two international locations or maybe each to maneuver a bit from what their positions have been. India’s place has been so long as the scenario of the border isn’t regular, the broader relationship can’t go to regular. China mentioned put aside what occurred on the border and simply transfer on. And so, there needs to be some give. The query is, is a cooldown attainable? Yes. But on what and whose phrases? And so, I believe you could possibly see that.

Now, what I believe this sort of effort for a thaw would require partially is, for instance, on the Chinese aspect, maybe a recalculation of the scenario it faces. One is you could possibly see a China that feels below stress from the U.S., an evaluation that issues may worsen below President Trump, or not less than it could be way more unsure. But additionally, a China that’s going through extra financial headwinds that you just talked about earlier, that that China says, okay, I wish to ease this entrance a bit, not less than for the short- to medium-term. A thaw would require some kind of recalculation from China.

From India’s perspective, I believe you could possibly see an argument in India to say sure to that type of dialogue that China may suggest stemming from a need for extra space and time to do the issues it needs to do to have the ability to develop in energy, for instance, and be capable of steadiness China in different methods.

I believe Indian policymakers additionally don’t need a disaster. It’s unpredictable. You don’t know the way it may pan out. So, I believe efforts to forestall such a disaster by way of dialogue may be palatable and even engaging to India.

I believe the opposite factor is you could possibly see some in India involved about different international locations, whether or not the U.S., Japan, Australia, even Europe really having these dialogues with China, and changing into involved about defection, so to talk. That others are going to depart India holding the bag. And so, you may see some requires that motive.

And then lastly, I believe India would even be eager about the prospect of a second Trump presidency and the uncertainty that might deliver. And similar to within the fall of 2017, the place you noticed India agreeing to Chinese efforts to achieve out, to stabilize ties, you could possibly see that. Though I believe 2020 has modified issues.

So, what I believe you may see, in the event you see these circumstances, however notably after the Indian election, as a result of I believe for any such settlement, even in India, to have this dialogue past a sure level, it must be a authorities that’s extra politically snug. So, post-election, the place authorities has a mandate, and a China that’s really making an effort, in order that that’s one thing for the Indian management to point out to the Indian public. I believe then you could possibly see some kind of dialogue stabilization effort.

But I discover it exhausting to imagine that you just’re going to see some main structural shift or grand discount between India and China. Their variations aren’t simply in regards to the border. That isn’t going to be resolved anytime quickly. It’s not even clear that each side may disengage on the border standoff factors. It’s unlikely that they may de-escalate in a big vogue, or not less than to pre-2020 ranges.

And even in the event you resolve the border tomorrow, there are all the opposite points, together with competitors within the Global South, within the Indian Ocean area, to not point out China strengthening India’s rival, Pakistan, as an illustration, or the financial variations that the 2 sides have.

So, stabilization possibly, however not a structural change within the elementary competitors between the 2 Asian giants.

58:04 Lightning Round: What is the most important delusion you hear in Europe about India-China ties?

With that, Tara, I wish to ask you a query, a lightning spherical query, that we finish all our episodes with, which is, what’s the largest delusion or misunderstanding you hear about India-China ties in Europe?

VARMA: I believe the most important misunderstanding is usually as a result of ignorance, to be trustworthy. I believe there may be little sense in Europe, even in main European capitals which have particular ties with India, of what India’s overseas coverage priorities are. And so, I believe individuals actually underestimate or simply don’t learn about how China is central to India’s strategic considering and the way the 1962 defeat is central to it and the way it’s actually constructed the way forward for its overseas coverage.

But I believe individuals additionally actually don’t know, not less than didn’t know till Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, of the closeness of India-Russia ties, and the way now the India, Russia, China triangle is making India’s life very sophisticated, not simply with itself, but additionally with its companions. And so, I believe that’s principally possibly India not speaking it sufficient and possibly us not understanding it sufficient.

[music]

MADAN: With zero humility, I might recommend that in the event that they do need extra data, they need to take heed to the whole lot of season one in every of our Global India podcast, which we at the moment are concluding with this episode. I wish to thank our workforce right here at Brookings that has helped put this collectively. But additionally, I wish to thank our viewers that has listened alongside for the entire season. If you do have questions in regards to the season, please do e-mail us at Global India at Brookings dot edu. But with that, let me log off. And because of all our listeners.

Thank you for tuning in to the Global India podcast. I’m Tanvi Madan, senior fellow within the Foreign Policy program on the Brookings Institution. You can discover analysis about India and extra episodes of this present on our web site, Brookings dot edu slash Global India.

My because of the manufacturing workforce, together with Kuwilileni Hauwanga, supervising producer; Fred Dews and Raman Preet Kaur, producers; Gastón Reboredo, audio engineer; and Daniel Morales, video editor. My thanks additionally to Alexandra Dimsdale and Hanna Foreman for his or her assist, and to Shavanthi Mendis, who designed the present artwork.

Additional assist for the podcast comes from my colleagues within the Foreign Policy program and the Office of Communications at Brookings.