IT WAS THE most momentous speech he ever gave, and it was underwhelming. On November third Hassan Nasrallah, the chief of Hizbullah, made his first remarks for the reason that begin of the battle in Gaza virtually a month in the past. His militant group has been concerned virtually for the reason that begin, launching scores of rockets and, extra just lately, explosive-laden drones at northern Israel. It warned that it might escalate the combating if Israel went forward with a floor invasion of Gaza, which Israel did per week earlier than Mr Nasrallah spoke.

PREMIUM

Read all our coverage of the war between Israel and Hamas

The days main as much as his speech have been tense in Lebanon. Supporters launched a collection of slick movies of Mr Nasrallah, which have been meant to look ominous—though the aesthetic was not a lot a declaration of battle as a trailer for a brand new Marvel movie. Some Lebanese stocked up on meals and gasoline; others packed luggage in case they wanted to hurry to the airport. One man would resolve whether or not Lebanon went to battle, and it was a person with no formal place in authorities. Najib Mikati, the prime minister, admits the choice is out of his palms.

In the tip, although, the speech urged Hizbullah nonetheless needs to keep away from all-out battle. A tired-looking Mr Nasrallah spoke for nearly 90 minutes. He aimed quite a lot of bombastic rhetoric at Israel and at America, its ally, however didn’t say something that hinted a significant escalation was coming. “This speech could have been an email,” joked one Lebanese viewer.

Instead Mr Nasrallah had three clear messages. The first was that he had had no prior information of the bloodbath on October seventh by Hamas, the militant group that controls Gaza, whose homicide of greater than 1,400 Israelis began the battle. Mr Nasrallah known as the assault “100% Palestinian” and stated it was stored secret from Hizbullah, different Palestinian factions and their widespread patron Iran. Officials in America, Iran and Israel all share that evaluation.

The second was to name for a ceasefire in Gaza—and urge different folks to make it occur. He instructed Arab and Muslim states, for instance, to impose an oil-and-gas embargo on Israel, echoing a name from Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme chief, a number of days earlier. Such rhetoric was little question meant to embarrass Arab leaders for his or her inaction. It was additionally meant to go the buck: Hizbullah isn’t accountable for ending the battle.

The third was to pat himself on the again. Mr Nasrallah stated that Israel was now taking fireplace from all sides—from Hamas in Gaza, Hizbullah in Lebanon and different Iranian-backed militias elsewhere—a scenario he known as unprecedented since Israel’s founding in 1948. Then he rattled off an inventory of Israeli military models that had been deployed to the Lebanese border. The implication was that Hizbullah’s restricted fireplace on Israel had already made a major contribution to the battle effort by tying down a part of the Israeli military.

He went on to say that “our efforts today will not be the end, and they will not be sufficient”. But he left his choices open for what may set off additional escalation. Israel has already killed greater than 9,000 Palestinians, displaced 1.5m extra and encircled northern Gaza with floor troops with out drawing a significant response.

All in all, his speech means that for now he’ll protect the established order. He has a number of causes to do this. One is America, which has despatched two aircraft-carrier teams to the japanese Mediterranean and explicitly warned Hizbullah to not escalate. Another is Iran, which views Hizbullah as a type of doomsday gadget—a robust weapon with which to discourage Israel from putting Iran instantly. It appears reluctant to threat that weapon to save lots of Hamas.

The group can also be beneath strain at residence. Lebanon is 4 years right into a grinding financial disaster. Annual inflation has been above 100% for 3 years, and the forex has misplaced 98% of its worth. A battle would trigger catastrophic harm that the nation can not afford to repair. Gulf states pledged greater than $1bn for reconstruction after the battle in 2006 however have uninterested in Lebanon’s persistent dysfunction and corruption and Hizbullah’s stranglehold over politics. They wouldn’t be inclined towards generosity this time.

A ballot printed by al-Akhbar, a newspaper sympathetic to Hizbullah, discovered that 68% of Lebanese didn’t help full-fledged battle with Israel. Even amongst Lebanese Shias, the primary base of Hizbullah’s help, opinions have been combined: 51% have been in favour of battle whereas 49% opposed it.

Hizbullah could hope to parlay its army restraint into political advantages. Lebanon has not had a president since October 2022, when Michel Aoun ended his six-year time period. Parliament has failed a dozen instances to decide on a alternative. Hizbullah want to set up an ally, Suleiman Frangieh, a politician who additionally has shut hyperlinks to Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian dictator. The group might imagine that refraining from battle will enable it to assert the presidency, and maybe different posts as nicely, corresponding to that of intelligence chief, which has been vacant since March.

There was a surreal split-screen whereas Mr Nasrallah spoke: Antony Blinken, the American secretary of state, was in Israel to satisfy with Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, and his battle cupboard. He wished to press Israel once more on its post-war plans for Gaza, which stay obscure. But his extra quick concern was the terrible humanitarian situations within the strip.

Joe Biden continues to reject speak of a ceasefire, however the American president has begun to push for transient lulls to permit extra humanitarian help to enter Gaza. “I think we need a pause,” he stated on November 1st. Some Israeli officers are prepared to think about the concept—though such pauses would most likely final for only some hours at a time.

Pauses is not going to cease Hizbullah’s day by day bombardment. Israel is unwilling to ponder a ceasefire. The battle will drag on, and this is not going to be the final time nervous viewers in Lebanon await Mr Nasrallah to announce their nation’s destiny.

© 2023, The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved. From The Economist, printed beneath licence. The authentic content material will be discovered on www.economist.com