Newswise — In 2020, amid the primary pandemic lockdowns, a scientific convention scheduled to happen in India by no means occurred.

But a gaggle of geologists who had been already on web site determined to benefit from their time and visited the Bhimbetka Rock Shelters, a collection of caves with historic cave artwork close to Bhopal, India. There, they noticed the fossil of Dickinsonia¸ a flat, elongated and primitive animal from earlier than complicated animals developed. It marked the first-ever discovery of Dickinsonia in India.

The animal lived 550 million years in the past, and the discover appeared to settle as soon as and for all of the surprisingly controversial age of the rocks making up a lot of the Indian subcontinent. The discover attracted the eye of The New York Times, The Weather Channel and the scientific journal Nature in addition to many Indian newspapers.

Only, it seems, the “fossil” was a case of mistaken identification. The true wrongdoer? Bees.

University of Florida researchers traveled to the positioning final 12 months and found the item had seemingly decayed considerably – fairly uncommon for a fossil. What’s extra, large bee’s nests populate the positioning, and the mark noticed by the scientists in 2020 intently resembled the stays of those giant hives.

“As soon as I looked at it, I thought something’s not right here,” stated Joseph Meert, a UF professor of geology and skilled on the geology of the world. “The fossil was peeling off the rock.”

The erstwhile fossil was additionally mendacity practically vertical alongside the partitions of the caves, which didn’t make sense. Instead, Meert says, fossils on this space ought to solely be seen flat on the ground or ceiling of the cave constructions.

Meert collaborated on the investigation along with his graduate college students Samuel Kwafo and Ananya Singha and University of Rajasthan professor Manoj Pandit. They documented the fast decay of the item and photographed related stays from close by beehives. The group published their findings of the mistaken identification Jan. 19 within the journal Gondwana Research, which beforehand revealed the report of the serendipitous Dickinsonia fossil discover.

Gregory Retallack, professor emeritus on the University of Oregon and lead writer of the original paper, says he and his co-authors agree with Meert’s findings that the item is basically only a beehive. They are submitting a remark in assist of the brand new paper to the journal.

This sort of self-correction is a bedrock precept of the scientific technique. But the truth is that admitting errors is difficult for scientists to do, and it doesn’t occur typically.

“It is rare but essential for scientists to confess mistakes when new evidence is discovered,” Retallack stated in an e-mail.

Correcting the fossil report places the age of the rocks again into competition. Because the rock formation doesn’t have any fossils from a identified time interval, courting it may be tough.

Meert says the proof continues to level to the rocks being nearer to at least one billion years previous. His group has used the radioactive decay of tiny crystals referred to as zircons up to now the rocks to that point interval. And the magnetic signature of the rocks, which captures details about the Earth’s magnetic discipline when the rocks fashioned, intently matches the signatures of formations confidently dated to a billion years in the past.

Other scientists have reported findings supporting a youthful age. The time interval is important to know due to its implications for the evolution of life within the space and the way the Indian subcontinent fashioned.

“You might say, ‘Okay, well what’s the big deal if they are 550 million or a billion years old?’ Well, there are lots of implications,” Meert stated. “One has to do with the paleogeography at the time, what was happening to continents, where the continents were located, how they were assembled. And it was a period when life was going through a major change, from very simple fossils to more complex fossils.”

“So trying to figure out the paleogeography at the time is very, very important. And in order to figure out the paleogeography, we have to know the age of the rocks,” he stated.