The U.S. Supreme Court refused to dam enforcement of an Alabama voting rights resolution.

Al Drago/Getty Images

disguise caption

toggle caption

Al Drago/Getty Images

The U.S. Supreme Court refused to dam enforcement of an Alabama voting rights resolution.

Al Drago/Getty Images

The U.S. Supreme Court refused on Tuesday to dam enforcement of an Alabama voting rights resolution that the high court issued just months ago.

In June, the court docket dominated that Alabama’s Republican-drawn congressional map violated the Voting Rights Act as a result of, in a state with seven congressional districts and a 27% Black inhabitants, the GOP-dominated legislature had created only one congressional district through which Black voters are both a majority or near it.

The court docket’s 5-to-4 resolution upheld a unanimous resolution by a three-judge decrease court docket panel that included two Trump appointees; the decrease court docket had required the creation of a second majority Black congressional district, and the Supreme Court agreed. But when the case was returned to the state legislature with orders to create a second majority black district, the GOP lawmakers did not do this. Instead they upped the variety of Black voters from 30% to 40% in one of many districts.

That prompted a pointy rebuke from the decrease court docket. Faced with what it seen as delaying ways and deliberate defiance of a Supreme Court resolution, the decrease court docket appointed a particular grasp to attract a brand new congressional map with two majority Black districts. To emphasize its displeasure with the state, the three-judge panel refused to place its order on maintain, noting that Alabama had already performed one congressional election in 2022 with an “unlawful map.”

The state, nevertheless, appealed to the Supreme Court a second time in an effort to postpone the creation of a brand new map. The state argued that it ought to be allowed time for a brand new authorized line of assault.

On Tuesday, nevertheless, the justices refused to delay the decrease court docket’s drawing of a brand new map with two majority, or near-majority black districts. In an unsigned order, the court docket stated: “The application for stay presented to Justice Thomas and by him referred to the Court is denied.”

No rationale was introduced and there have been no famous dissents.

The Supreme Court’s motion was an extra repudiation of Alabama’s ways, and served as a reminder that the Voting Rights Act, as soon as seen by the court docket’s conservatives as now not crucial, continues to offer a restricted however essential guardrail in opposition to deliberate dilution of black voting power.

Indeed, Tuesday’s Supreme Court motion may effectively bolster challenges to maps drawn by Republican-dominated legislatures in different Southern states the place civil rights teams and Democrats have introduced fits arguing that Republicans are illegally diluting the facility of Black voters.