Google has agreed to pay $700 million and make a number of different concessions to settle allegations that it had been stifling competitors in opposition to its Android app retailer — the identical challenge that went to trial in one other case that would lead to even greater modifications.

Although Google struck the deal with state attorneys basic in September, the settlement’s phrases weren’t revealed till late Monday in paperwork filed in San Francisco federal courtroom. The disclosure got here per week after a federal court jury rebuked Google for deploying anticompetitive techniques in its Play Store for Android apps.

The settlement with the states consists of $630 million to compensate U.S. customers funneled right into a cost processing system that state attorneys basic alleged drove up the costs for digital transactions inside apps downloaded from the Play Store. That retailer caters to the Android software program that powers a lot of the world’s smartphones.

Like Apple does in its iPhone app retailer, Google collects commissions starting from 15% to 30% on in-app purchases — charges that state attorneys basic contended drove costs larger than they might have been had there been an open marketplace for cost processing. Those commissions generated billions of {dollars} in revenue yearly for Google, in line with proof offered within the latest trial targeted on its Play Store.

Eligible customers will obtain at the least $2, in line with the settlement, and will get extra funds primarily based on their spending on the Play retailer between Aug. 16, 2016 and Sept. 30, 2023. The estimated 102 million U.S. customers who made in-app purchases throughout that timeframe are imagined to be robotically notified about varied choices for the way they’ll obtain their lower of the cash.

Another $70 million of the pre-trial settlement will cowl the penalties and different prices that Google is being compelled to pay to the states.

Although Google is forking over a sizeable sum, it is a fraction of the $10.5 billion in damages that the attorneys basic estimated the corporate might be compelled to pay if that they had taken the case to trial as an alternative of settling.

Google additionally agreed to make different modifications designed to make it even simpler for customers to obtain and set up Android apps from different shops in addition to its Play Store for the following 5 years. It will chorus from issuing as many safety warnings, or “scare screens,” when alternative choices are being used.

The makers of Android apps will also gain more flexibility to offer alternative payment choices to consumers instead of having transactions automatically processed through the Play Store and its commission system. Apps will also be able to promote lower prices available to consumers who choose an alternate to the Play Store’s payment processing.

Investors seemed unfazed by the settlement as shares in Google’s corporate parent, Alphabet Inc., rose slightly in Tuesday’s midday trading.

The settlement represents a “loud and clear message to Big Tech — attorneys general across the country are unified, and we are prepared to use the full weight of our collective authority to ensure free and fair access to the digital marketplace,” mentioned Connecticut Attorney General William Tong.

Wilson White, Google’s vice chairman of presidency affairs and public coverage, framed the deal as a optimistic for the corporate, regardless of the cash and concessions it entails. The settlement “builds on Android’s choice and flexibility, maintains strong security protections, and retains Google’s ability to compete with other (software) makers, and invest in the Android ecosystem for users and developers,” White wrote in a blog post.

Although the state attorneys general hailed the settlement as a huge win for consumers, it didn’t go far enough for Epic Games, which spearheaded the attack on Google’s app store practices with an antitrust lawsuit filed in August 2020.

Epic, the maker of the popular Fortnite video game, rebuffed the settlement in September and instead chose to take its case to trial, even though it had already lost on most of its key claims in an analogous trial concentrating on Apple and its iPhone app retailer in 2021.

The Apple trial, although, was determined by a federal decide as an alternative of the jury that vindicated Epic with a unanimous verdict that Google had constructed anticompetitive boundaries across the Play Store. Google has vowed to attraction the decision.

Corie Wright, Epic’s vice chairman of public coverage, derided the states’ settlement as little greater than a one-time payout that gives “no true relief for consumers or developers,” in a blog post.

In court documents, the attorneys general said they decided to settle because of significant risks posed by a trial, including the possibility that a jury may have thought their plan to seek $10.5 billion in damages was exorbitant. The attorneys general also cited for the potential of jurors becoming confused had their case been presented alongside Epic’s claims in the trial, as had been the original plan.

But now the Epic trial’s outcome nevertheless raises the specter of Google potentially being ordered to pay even more money as punishment for its past practices and making even more dramatic changes to its lucrative Android app ecosystem.

Those changes will be determined next year by U.S. District Judge James Donato, who presided over the Epic Games trial. Donato also still must approve Google’s Play Store settlement with the states.

“In the next phase of the case, Epic will seek meaningful remedies to truly open up the Android ecosystem so consumers and developers will genuinely benefit from the competition that U.S. antitrust laws were designed to promote,” Wright pledged.

Google faces a good greater authorized risk in one other antitrust case concentrating on its dominant search engine that serves because the centerpiece of a digital advert empire that generates greater than $200 billion in gross sales yearly. Closing arguments in a trial pitting Google in opposition to the Justice Department are scheduled for early May earlier than a federal decide in Washington D.C.