Audio of this conversation is available via your favorite podcast service.

Last week, the U.S Secretaries of State and Commerce and commerce representatives from President Joe Biden’s administration met with high European Union officers within the coronary heart of the Swedish Lapland for the fourth Ministerial assembly of the U.S.-EU Trade and Technology Council, or “TTC”.

Pressing wants have been tackled, new initiatives have been launched, commitments have been made, and cooperation was deepened on a spread of tech coverage points, not less than in response to the press releases.

To hear an unvarnished view from somebody who was on the assembly about what would possibly really come of all of it, I invited on a journalist who’s, for my part, one one of the best tech coverage reporters on the earth: Mark Scott, Chief Technology Correspondent for Politico. With his colleagues, Mark filed a number of items from Luleå, Sweden, the place the occasion was held, together with on the diploma to which the specter of China loomed over the meeting; on tough talk from European Union inner market commissioner Thierry Breton; and on the dialogue around artificial intelligence.

What follows is a evenly edited transcript of the dialogue.

Justin Hendrix:

Mark, you may have simply returned from a really attention-grabbing assembly that I really feel like is kind of much less effectively lined, a bit of bit off the crushed path. Can you inform of us simply what went on in Sweden and what you noticed there?

Mark Scott:

Sure. I imply it wasn’t simply Sweden, it was northern Sweden. We have been simply within the south of the Arctic Circle in a spot known as Luleå, which is a city of about 75,000 individuals, and forgive my terrible pronunciation. It’s the biannual EU-US Trade and Tech Council Summit.

What does that imply? It has been occurring for about two years and it includes Anthony Blinken, Gina Raimondo, the Commerce Secretary, and Katherine Tai, the US Trade Representative getting along with their European counterparts, Margrethe Vestager, who’s the… She has a protracted title, however principally she’s the European Commission’s digital chief and her commerce counterpart, Valdis Dombrovskis.

They get collectively, they hash out hopefully thorny points on commerce and tech to create some kind of transatlantic unity. The thought principally is to kind of bridge a number of the divides that got here up in the course of the Trump administration.

Justin Hendrix:

I believe from the US aspect, it’s maybe proper to see this as a part of the form of typically pro-democratic effort that the Biden administration has been on. It’s kind of a form with the Summit for Democracy, the Declaration for the Future of the Internet, a few of these forms of actions.

Mark Scott:

Yeah. Reading from my notes, “America’s back,” proper. This is all about selling to European allies that DC is taking this stuff significantly.

Justin Hendrix:

I appreciated a few of your protection. You included some nice particulars. You talked a bit of bit about the truth that the AI dialog specifically happened over a lunch of cod loin and chocolate praline. AI appeared to have been the subject du jour. What was all of it about? What was the objective between the US and EU counterparts there?

Mark Scott:

Sure. To caveat, I didn’t get the chocolate praline, in order that’s a disgrace from my finish. The AI dialogue has been occurring inside the Trade and Tech Council because the starting, since kind of early final yr. But it’s been very technical. The thought being that what will we do with this so-called reliable AI?

They’ve been hashing out by way of very wonky working teams that meet kind of quasi commonly about metrics and measurements and bringing in one of the best of either side. That’s nice and that’s form of what {industry} desires. They wish to make it possible for, sure, the Europeans are going a compulsory authorized route, the Americans not a lot, however the place is the frequent floor? That all modified when ChatGPT got here round. We are seeing this in DC, in Brussels, in Brasilia, in New Delhi, wherever you go. It’s kind of, “What do we do about generative AI?”

About two, three months in the past, the dialogue that was very technocratic modified to, “Okay, let’s do something, or to be seen to be doing something on generative AI.” You had Blinken and Vestager and all of the others on the closing press convention making a concerted effort to debate one thing that they’re calling a voluntary code of conduct. We don’t know what which means, however principally it’s an renewed effort to kind of take an enormous swing at a macro degree at generative AI specifically to say, “Look, we know you guys are… The public’s freaking out. We’re on this. We’re going to do our best to come up with some solutions.”

Justin Hendrix:

These codes of conduct or codes of follow are I consider as kind of very European. All about getting {industry} to comply with sure ideas, sure goals, after which maybe seeing if that may result in, I suppose, a framework for regulation.

Mark Scott:

I don’t wish to name-drop as a result of I’m not an important particular person, however I acquired to spend a while with Margrethe Vestager on the finish of the convention, and he or she was principally saying that it is a two-page briefing word that the Commission wrote out themselves, and he or she personally handed it over to Raimondo over the cod loin and praline lunch. This is a really a lot at present a European-centric method to codes of conduct. It’s a query of will the Commerce Department and possibly the National Security Council within the White House will they comply with it? We have to determine that out.

We now have a few so-called Sherpas on either side to take the hundreds on really what will probably be concerned on this code of conduct. But the thought is to create some kind of transatlantic voluntary code to current on the G7 assembly that’s going to be held someday within the fall.

Justin Hendrix:

We’ve acquired this separate course of, this G7 AI course of, and we’ve acquired three devoted knowledgeable teams which can be popping out of this that’ll give attention to, it appears like, AI terminology and taxonomy, cooperation on AI requirements and instruments for reliable AI and danger administration and monitoring and measuring present and rising AI dangers.

This is all from the readout from the White House. I see an inventory of 65 key AI phrases important to understanding risk-based approaches to AI, which the US and EU are working to harmonize. This all sounds nice, proper, two of the world’s largest economies engaged on AI collectively. But the US and the EU actually don’t see eye to eye on how one can go about this in any respect.

Mark Scott:

I imply, that’s placing it very mildly, proper. I believe it is advisable to see this as two tracks. The metrics and the measures you talked about have been present AI work inside the Trade and Tech Council that was occurring for the final two years. It was very technocratic, and albeit nobody cared as a result of it’s kind of issues that solely the boffins of the boffins care about, to make use of a British time period.

Then there’s this code of conduct which is like, “Oh crap, we need to be doing something on generative AI now and therefore we’re going to bring in the Secretary of State, we’re going to bring in Europe’s digital chief to give a broader macro view,” which they inserted it on the final minute, actually the two-page doc mentioned on the final day. That is the factor the place we have to focus.

But that doesn’t get away from the truth that Europe has its AI Act, which they’re making an attempt to get achieved by December. It’s supposed to make sure that firms can’t use the sure applied sciences in so-called dangerous use circumstances.

As we’ve seen within the final kind of month or so, with a number of govt orders and conferences on the White House and even Sam Altman from OpenAI testifying to the Senate, the US is taking an curiosity, however no laws goes to get handed this time period earlier than 2024. The White House itself is taking, from my opinion, a really industry-led method to what to do about this.

Justin Hendrix:

Yeah. You had senators form of speaking to Sam Altman, effectively, by his first title, calling him Sam. They’d all simply come off a dinner with him apparently the night time earlier than the listening to. So you do get a way of this closeness. When Biden hosted his summit on AI, it was in fact company executives that have been within the room fairly than critics or advocates for reform.

Mark Scott:

I imply that is sensible, although, proper? I imply you take a look at, okay, let’s take OpenAI and Microsoft, Google, Meta as possibly 4 who’ve arguably essentially the most invested in AI, they usually’re all American firms. There was a industrial curiosity to do that, and that’s a logical approach to go about this.

You then take a look at what goes on in Europe, and I’m not saying that as sitting right here in London, however they’ve a really totally different method to this as a result of there are fewer firms in Europe doing this, and due to this fact it’s seen as a possible, one other space the place the Americans can dominate. Rightly so, they’ve invested essentially the most, however it’s undoubtedly there’s a industrial curiosity underlying how either side are this.

Justin Hendrix:

Is there a way within the conversations you’ve had both I suppose with a number of the leaders or maybe within the hallway that the US is simply going to go this laissez-faire route once more, and the identical kind of scenario that we’ve got with social media is about to repeat itself the place American, company, dominance, energy, basically these merchandise form of propagate themselves, and Europe is kind of left to attempt to determine how one can reign of their practices and possibly attempt to shield their very own residents inside their very own ideas and frameworks?

Mark Scott:

I imply, I believe there are lots of people within the administration who additionally wish to shield Americans, proper. This will not be about letting {industry} do what {industry} does. But I do suppose simply wanting on the political dynamics within the US proper now when it comes to Congress and even a number of the states, it’s very troublesome to move any laws, not to mention digital laws.

I believe in relation to AI, we’re having plenty of rhetoric and plenty of govt orders and even DOJ and the FTC saying, “We’ll use our powers to do what we can,” however there’s no federal privateness regulation, proper. There are points with how this works within the US that makes it harder. And as a lot as I’ve points with the European method on how they go about regulation, they’ve been engaged on an AI act for greater than two years. The indisputable fact that till very just lately it didn’t even take a look at generative AI is an issue, however they’re making an attempt to repair that.

It is only a query of simply how each machines work that it’s very totally different and getting them to each agree on some kind of voluntary code past platitudes goes to be troublesome.

Justin Hendrix:

AI was not the one topic on the desk at this assembly. And I wish to form of simply throw out a number of others and get your tackle what was mentioned. Maybe I’ll simply provide you with one or two phrase prompts and see what comes out.

One factor that stood out to me: digital identification.

Mark Scott:

Oh, yeah. This is one in all these wonky matters that the Trade and Tech Council is meant to repair. This is about serving to propagate kind of requirements and guidelines throughout each jurisdictions to allow them to frankly tackle China. I imply, nobody desires to say China on the European aspect, however it’s about China. The thought of making an attempt to share finest practices on digital rule and digital ID is essential to this as a result of it each performs into the commerce facet, however it additionally permits to kind of digitize tax techniques and all the opposite form of technocratic issues that nobody cares about however could be fairly efficient if you’re trying to lower prices and make issues extra environment friendly.

Justin Hendrix:

Semiconductors.

Mark Scott:

Ah, the chips to difficulty. As you already know higher than anybody, either side have invested or will probably be trying to make investments billions of {dollars} to subsidize home semiconductor manufacturing. The difficulty with that’s you’ve acquired the Intels and the TSMCs on the earth going round and saying, “Hey DC, Brussels has offered me 10 billion. Can you offer me more?” What they’re making an attempt to keep away from is a so-called subsidy race.

The semiconductor dialog is principally, “Let’s be very transparent about where we’re going to spend our money.” If Intel involves me, and different firms can do it too, if Intel involves say, the US state says, “Can you offer me this much money? Because the Europeans have done it too,” they’ll verify to verify the businesses aren’t mendacity. Therefore, you’re not ending up saying horse-trading between two jurisdictions who’ve equally legitimate causes to deliver semiconductor manufacturing house, however there’s a opacity on what the negotiations appear to be. The thought is to kind of share that info on the frontline so that cash could be finest spent is the follow.

Justin Hendrix:

We’ve acquired a quick little point out of quantum.

Mark Scott:

This is about R&D. Arguably, as you mentioned, the US and Europe are two of the, not less than the Western world’s, largest democracies and market economies. Quantum, should you’re trying to tackle China, is an enormous difficulty. How do you then maximize that so individuals in Toulouse and Tallahassee can share no matter they’re doing to most impact.

This is about, once more, issues that… I get why the general public don’t care that a lot about, however in case you are working in quantum and swiftly you’ll be able to entry European Horizon 2020 funding, which is billions of {dollars}, then that might be fairly helpful to you and vice versa. If you’re a European trying to entry kind of, I don’t know, commerce cash as effectively.

Justin Hendrix:

You talked about China, and a few of your reporting has been on the specter of China. There’s additionally a phase in right here actually on the geopolitical context, and one of many issues that stands out is coordination round disinformation and what the group calls Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference, FIMI, which is a brand new acronym that I’ll need to begin to undertake.

Mark Scott:

That nobody will use, to be frank. This is an attention-grabbing one. There is an clearly a politicized dialog round misinformation and disinformation proper now occurring within the US, notably within the House of Representatives. Part of the dialogue has been about let’s get into a number of the misinformation, international interference query, however let’s not contact something home as a result of that has home political implications for notably the US aspect.

What they’re doing, after which title checking Russia and China specifically saying you might be interfering in Latin America and Africa, so we’re going to coordinate our response when it comes to pre-bunking, as they name it, getting forward of Russian disinformation ways in say Colombia to indicate like, “No, you’re doing this.”

The downside with that’s if you speak to the people who find themselves doing this work on the bottom and say, “Hey look, you get to now work with the DHS and then you get to work with the G7 rapid reaction unit, all these other kind of groups that are working on disinfo,” they aren’t actually concerned on this new coordination regard by the Trade and Tech Council. I nonetheless stay considerably skeptical. This isn’t just, once more, platitudes, like what is definitely the meat to the bone that we’re going to see from this?

Justin Hendrix:

One of the issues that basically stood out to me was that a number of the language round baby security and on-line concern round psychological well being and a few of these issues additionally made it into the readout. Were you current for any of the dialogue about these points?

Mark Scott:

Biden talked about in his State of the Union handle and in addition there may be explicit baby security laws coming in Europe. Without being massively cynical, and this is a vital difficulty, you don’t lose votes by saying, “I want to protect children online,” after which it’s a huge psychological well being difficulty.

There is a priority occurring round what platforms are doing and what you’ve seen with a wide range of age acceptable design codes popping out of the US states. This is an enormous difficulty coming by way of, not less than at a neighborhood degree within the US too. I believe that may be a query of we’re recognizing collectively that we have to do a greater job of defending youngsters and what they see on-line.

Justin Hendrix:

Let’s speak in regards to the piece that comes immediately after that, which is that this concern round enabling unbiased analysis. I believe you have been the primary to report that this was a form of focus of the conversations. I suppose the promise was that maybe there’d be a possibility to one way or the other harmonize the unbiased analysis entry provisions of the Digital Services Act in a manner that might make it doable for US researchers to have comparable entry or maybe for there’d be another codification of such entry within the United States. Is that one thing that acquired mentioned? Is {that a} risk?

Mark Scott:

I believe it’s. Let’s take a fast step again and say why that is necessary. We have the US, European, UK and Indian elections subsequent yr, and we nonetheless have a really restricted data base about what’s occurring on social media. Data entry is essential to this. It supplies transparency, accountability. It lets everybody else, journalists included know what’s occurring. It’s actually necessary and corporations like Reddit and Twitter are reducing again on this entry. It’s fairly essential for this to occur. The Digital Services Act in Europe supplies necessary necessities for the platforms to do that, and we’re going to see that roll out within the subsequent, say, 6 or 12 months.

The query then turns into should you’re providing it to Europe forward of subsequent yr’s election, the White House and different elements of the administration have a reliable query to say, “Well, why don’t you offer that to us too?” There’s a monitor report for this again in 2018 when Europe handed its GDPR knowledge safety overhaul, a few of these provisions and protections about consent and knowledge utilization acquired transferred over to the US in kind of a, what I name, a GDPR gentle that allowed the Europe… the US citizenry to profit from a number of the stuff that was occurring in Europe. It wasn’t excellent, however it was one thing comparable.

What I believe what we’re going to see hopefully by December, not less than that’s what the timeframe I used to be provided that some kind of… Again, these are my phrases, DSA gentle regime coming, not less than introduced by the White House or the administration in December that might enable US researchers to have similar-ish voluntary knowledge entry from the platforms akin to what’s being made necessary in Europe.

Justin Hendrix:

Do you already know something in regards to the kind of US aspect of that, and that might basically be achieved below some form of govt order or in any other case, I don’t know, administered by a federal company?

Mark Scott:

I imply that’s the $64 million query, and there’s been a little bit of a churn within the White House in these matters within the final couple of months. Ask me in a month once I hopefully get to talk to some individuals to know what’s occurring. But I do suppose, once more, it’s very tentative proper now, however the language within the Trad and Tech Council communique that got here out, which you’re studying from, was principally lifted phrase for phrase from the Digital Services Act.

And so if we’re going to take that at their phrase, and there’s a acutely aware effort inside the White House to do one thing on this, and the truth that Congress is just about shut down for political causes, these are my finest supposition, you’re looking at some kind of govt order, or not less than arm twisting of the platforms to say, “Can you do this?”

Because what occurred with GDPR is the platforms principally did that themselves based mostly on some robust phrases from the administration. Will we see an govt order or will or not it’s kind of quiet phrases in a backroom someplace? It’s to be decided?

Justin Hendrix:

If there are any US officers listening to this by any likelihood that may shed any gentle, I’m certain I’d like to listen to from you, and I’m certain Mark would as effectively. Let me ask you… Grab bag time. Anything that we’ve not mentioned that you just suppose was necessary? There was quite a bit round connectivity, 6G, which some listeners could also be stunned to be taught is now on the agenda. It appears like we’ve barely choked down 5G. Lots of connectivity points, a number of particular points to do with explicit nations and different forms of bilateral conversations which can be necessary each to the US and to the EU. What else ought to we take note of popping out of this?

Mark Scott:

It’s an attention-grabbing one. I believe we are able to’t neglect the geopolitics of this. Again, that’s form of my jam. I form of take a look at the tech from a geopolitical lens, however I believe the truth that you may have these two shut allies regardless of their kind of so-called frenemy relationship coming collectively to speak about 6G and telecommunications and semiconductors and all these points, you’ll be able to’t escape the truth that China is within the room however not, proper.

You take a look at what the US administration, each Biden and Trump, did round Huawei and now they’re trying to do round TikTookay when it comes to each… and semiconductors to a level of making an attempt to restrict China’s encroachment into this kind of tech and digital house, that’s underlying a number of the purpose why not less than from the US aspect, you’re seeing, let’s work collectively on 60 requirements so we are able to have a Western consensus to push out China. Let’s do stuff on semiconductors to push out China. Let’s take a look at a number of the different points from the US aspect to deliver the Europeans on to our mind-set.

From a European perspective, it’s a bit extra difficult as a result of typically the US doesn’t get this, however Europe is in a monolith. There are a number of totally different jurisdictions and nations with totally different pursuits. From the US… European perspective, it’s about coaxing the US to tackle a extra European fashion regulatory method to tech. That goes from all the things from the platform stuff we mentioned even to 60, which frankly the Europeans in comparison with the US is main on with Nokia and Ericsson versus possibly Intel on the US aspect there.

There’s kind of a push and pull between the US form of hoping and prepared the Europeans to tackle the anti-China hawkish view after which from Brussels, the concept we’re profitable this entire Brussels impact by kind of nudging the Americans in the direction of a European fashion kind of regulatory regime. It’s someplace in between. Neither aspect is getting all the things they need, however the truth that you’ve acquired Anthony Blinken, Gina Raimondo, Katherine Tai, and the Europeans coming to a city in the midst of nowhere… It actually is the center of nowhere… for 2 days, I believe, is emblematic of not less than that transatlantic ties being fostered once more.

Justin Hendrix:

When you have been there within the room, is there a way of a pecking order? Is there a way of US throwing its weight round and its kind of progressive muscle or European officers having to, I suppose, advocate for his or her perspective on this regard? Do you get a way of that as an observer?

Mark Scott:

I believe it’s very mutual. I imply, I do know that it’d be good if one was kind of bullying the opposite as a result of that’s the higher story, however I do suppose there’s plenty of mutual respect between kind of the mid-career officers who’ve to sit down in countless Zoom calls to hash these things out. I believe there’s a relationship there, and once more, it’s not about tech points, however the Trade and Tech Council additionally checked out export controls on Russia after the warfare, after which it was very profitable to hash out that in a short time as a result of the officers knew one another.

I do suppose there’s a query about what occurs subsequent yr if there was a change in administration within the US. Does it stick round? Is this simply one other glorified 4 yr pet tasks for Photoshop, for photograph alternatives after which it disappears? That is an enormous unknown, proper. That is a query.

But I do suppose at present, and that is partly due to a scarcity of muscle reminiscence within the US aspect in relation to digital policymaking, the truth that the Europeans, prefer it or not, have the Digital Markets Act, the Digital Services Act, the Digital Governance Act, the Data Act, the AI Act and GDPR… Sorry, that’s plenty of acronyms. They simply have an even bigger pool of assets to deliver to the desk in comparison with what does the US supply? Don’t play good with China is just about the message.

The US has plenty of the nice technical abilities in NIST and NTIA to assist with a number of the standardization, however when it comes to here’s a prescribed rule ebook, which you are able to do now, it’s a unlucky indisputable fact that the Europeans simply have extra of that than the US does in the meanwhile.

Justin Hendrix:

You’ve talked about this concept, this dialog could be very a lot taking place below the specter of China, and that to some extent that is about harmonizing US and EU views. But do you suppose there’s a shared sense of the longer term between these two delegations of the longer term that we wish, of Silicon Valley’s position sooner or later that we wish? Or is it nonetheless coming from a really totally different place?

Mark Scott:

It’s nonetheless coming from a really totally different place, and I say that with somebody who has a foot in each camps that there’s nonetheless a regulate first, ask questions later mentality in Europe that doesn’t actually have any industrial crucial, principally as a result of there aren’t any firms actually right here… Sorry, Spotify and SAP… and on the US aspect as a result of there was a scarcity of motion in Congress after which within the beltway and since the businesses are based within the US, there’s a kind of reliable industrial purpose why, once more, that we’ve moved on from this phrase, however kind of transfer quick and break issues mentality nonetheless exists to a level.

I nonetheless suppose there’s a wariness from the US to suppose that all the things out of Europe is protectionist and the Europeans nonetheless have a false impression that every one American policymakers suppose they’re within the pockets of Meta and Amazon. Neither is true, however I nonetheless suppose regardless of two years of a number of discussions, common conferences, there may be nonetheless a query of, ‘we have a different approach to this. We don’t actually have an answer. But if we hold assembly in the midst of nowhere in Sweden each six months, or Pennsylvania or Philadelphia with…’ No, excuse me, Pittsburgh, it was certainly, within the US, ‘we can figure something out.’

What we see with the voluntary code of conduct on AI and generative AI is a transparent instance of that’s a beautiful headline, however it’s a two-page doc that has no element to it, and you’ve got lower than six months to formulate that to current to the G7. What occurs with it, and if something occurs from it’s a clear litmus check each for the Trade and Tech Council but in addition for the transatlantic relationship.

Justin Hendrix:

Well, maybe we’ll have you ever again if you’ve had an opportunity to go to Hiroshima, and possibly in the event that they didn’t provide you with any cod and pralines, possibly you’ll have some good meals at that assembly.

Mark Scott:

I hope so.

Justin Hendrix:

Mark, thanks very a lot for becoming a member of me and hope to speak to you quickly.

Mark Scott:

Thank you.

Justin Hendrix is CEO and Editor of Tech Policy Press, a brand new nonprofit media enterprise involved with the intersection of expertise and democracy. Previously, he was Executive Director of NYC Media Lab. He spent over a decade at The Economist in roles together with Vice President, Business Development & Innovation. He is an affiliate analysis scientist and adjunct professor at NYU Tandon School of Engineering. Opinions expressed listed below are his personal.

Related