In the early 2000s, a gaggle of foresters walked into the village of Nagesh in Gariaband district, Chhattisgarh, carrying a set of maps. They performed a mini-survey after which proceeded to plant munaras, or posts, all through the village. Some posts have been planted in vacant areas shared by two or extra households of Bhunjiya – a neighborhood categorised as a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group in Chhattisgarh, owing to their declining inhabitants, excessive poverty charges, and fading tradition.

“When we asked the foresters why they were doing the same, they simply told us that they were trying to decipher the real border of the forests,” Arjun Singh Naik, a neighborhood chief and former village head, or sarpanch, instructed me. The households that fell on the ‘wrong’ aspect of the border have been warned of eviction. Time and once more, members of those households have needed to journey to the district headquarters, practically two hours away by foot, to plead their case with forest officers. There, a forester invariably rolled out a map, pointed to a skinny line and justify the existence of the forest in a means that made the Bhunjiya presence really feel like an accident or mistake. The traces on the map have been made to seem as acts of god and never the federal government. Perhaps this is the reason the novel geographer John Brian Harley contended that maps “exert a social influence through their omissions, as much as by the features they depict and emphasise.”

Two a long time later, the identical communities are utilizing digital maps to impose a special which means on the panorama from the one asserted by the federal government. Scholars in fields similar to vital border research and demanding cartography liken this to an train in ‘counter-mapping.’ In the context of Indonesia, the agricultural sociologist Nancy Lee Peluso describes counter-mapping because the appropriation of mapping applied sciences in a means that “increase(s) the power of people living in a mapped area to control representations of themselves and their claims to resources.” In Chhattisgarh, one grassroots organisation, Khoj Avam Jan Jagriti Samiti, has empowered Adivasis to deploy geographic data techniques of their bid to withstand, contest and redefine the borders imposed by the postcolonial Indian state.

The energy of maps

According to the artist and cartographer Denis Wood, maps masquerade as impartial representations. This ‘naturalises’ borders, making it seem as if they’ve existed from time immemorial. In his ebook The Power of Maps, Wood makes an emphatic case for the way this quantities to a devious technique – one which conceals the politics of the fashionable nation-state and its motives for making maps. Activists primarily based in Chhattisgarh’s state capital, Raipur, defined how the extension of forest borders is usually a determined bid by the forest division to get better acreage it has misplaced to mines and dams elsewhere. One activist in Gariaband, Gannu Ram Poya, averred that “it is not always villages that encroach on forests, the opposite can also be true.”

There is cause to consider that such incidents additionally transpire on account of inter-departmental contestations over a class of land known as ‘orange areas,’ regionally described as small forests with sparse tree cowl. The authorities’s income and forest departments are infamous for sparring over such areas. The forest division usually tries to undertake prolonged plantations; the income division, alternatively, seeks to levy taxes on the agricultural makes use of the villagers have of such lands. An Indian Express report from final 12 months relates how this continues so far. Control of near 300 sq. kilometres of orange space in Chhattisgarh’s Bastar area was transferred from the forest to the income division in March 2022. In response, the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change requested the state to cease the switch of land.

Around 2006, foresters started to more and more circle the Udanti-Sitanadi wildlife sanctuary, which coated practically half of Gariaband district’s 5,800 sq. kilometres. They developed a brand new set of maps that, in 2008, elevated the sanctuary to the standing of a tiger reserve. Several Bhunjiya settlements inside the ‘core area’ of the reserve have been now threatened with displacement.

On 15 August 2022, India’s seventy fifth Independence Day, I used to be in Karlajhar village, just a few kilometres from Nagesh. Shortly after a flag-hoisting ceremony to mark the event, Karan Singh Nag, a village elder, stated, “Brother, this core has turned us into chor [thieves].” We have been standing near a top level view map of India drawn on the bottom by college youngsters whilst Karan Singh described how the forest division’s maps had turned the villagers into trespassers in their very own properties. Here was the ability of maps on full show. The ensuing dialogue centred on how the federal government’s mapmaking processes have been non-negotiable, deterministic and never with out their silences. “What of the forests that have been robbed from the Adivasis in the name of development, is there not a map for it?” a Bhunjiya youth, Arjun, requested.

Khatia girdawli and its discontents

The work of Khoj exhibits how new community-led bordering practices contest the hegemony of the state’s mapping processes to create extra democratic areas for conservation.

In my first assembly with Beni Puri Goswami, the founding father of Khoj, he defined how the Scheduled Tribes and Other Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, saved the Adivasis of Nagesh and Karlajhar from being displaced. The Forest Rights Act, as it’s broadly identified, offers forest dwellers ‘tenurial rights’ over land they’ve already been residing on or holding. After 2008, when the principles for implementing the act have been framed, Khoj grew to become more and more concerned within the promulgation of particular person forest rights. Most usually, this meant serving to Adivasi communities with the mandatory paperwork. “Little did we expect that this would bring us back into conflict with the government’s mapping processes,” Beni Puri stated.

The authorities had arrange groups to go to villages and settle particular person forest rights on the bottom. “Everything was fine, only that these teams were accustomed to khatia girdawli,” Beni Puri defined. In Chhattisgarhi, this refers back to the bureaucratic predisposition to conduct surveys from a distance, comfortably seated on a village cot, or khatia. The internet outcome was normally inaccuracy and confusion. Several claimants got lower than their fair proportion of land. If the quantity allotted was right, usually the handle of the family was incorrect. Worst of all, two or extra households have been usually given rights over the identical plot of land, leading to super battle.

The authorities’s mapmaking processes have been non-negotiable, deterministic and never with out their silences.

The solely method to stop these points was to rent retired patwaris, or surveyors, beforehand related to the income division. Local youth have been hooked up to such surveyors, and particular person forest rights claims have been verified on the bottom previous to being filed. This added to the labours of organisations similar to Khoj however prevented future battle and confusion.

However, as one set of issues was being addressed, one other emerged. The Adivasis within the core space of the newly based Udanti-Sitanandi tiger reserve have been discovering it enormously tough to entry forest sources. Arjun, the native youth at Karlajhar, instructed me that patrolling by forest guards had intensified, and his family members have been ordered to until solely on the land they’d gained rights over. Things proved to be extra excessive for the Kamar neighborhood of Kulhadi Ghat village. The Kamars, very like the Bhunjiyas, are categorised as a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group. Kulhadi Ghat in the present day boasts pucca homes, concrete roads, neighborhood faucets and different indicators of presidency patronage, however this doesn’t treatment the village’s sense of lasting powerlessness. “The period following 2008 proved to be highly difficult,” Ban Singh Kamar, the village sarpanch, stated. “Foresters began to think that just because they have given some land to the Adivasis to cultivate it was enough, and we should stop entering the forests.”

What historical past says

Surveying in nineteenth-century India was primarily about governing a topic race and never effecting social justice. The guiding goal was to repair and decide the landed property of particular person ryots, or tenant farmers, if not of zamindars, for functions of tax assortment. In the method, indigenous societies’ extra fluid, seasonal and overlapping techniques of interplay with forest-based sources have been both glossed over or negated. The historian Gunnel Cederlöf’s evaluation of India’s Northeastern frontiers within the early nineteenth century confirms that “counter-arguments concerning the validity of custom or practice were swept aside” in land-settlement processes. The identical processes favoured the propertied over itinerant and conventionally unpropertied tribespeople. In all likelihood, the Bhunjiyas, Kamars and a number of other different Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups, by advantage of historically being hunter-gatherer communities, misplaced out from this discriminatory follow, with lasting repercussions.

Paired with the landed elites, the colonial powers got here to explain such tribes as ‘criminal gangs’ wandering the countryside. The criminalisation of the Bhunjiyas as thieves and poachers in their very own properties echoes this historical past.

Other map historians, similar to Matthew H Edney, lay naked how geographic surveyors have been additionally accompanied by colonial geologists and foresters within the nineteenth century. While geographers transcribed landscapes into maps, geologists pried for proof of ores and minerals, and foresters scouted tracts for timber manufacturing. The extra geologists and foresters consolidated management over land for his or her goals, the tougher life grew to become for nomadic societies that veered away from the norm of settled agriculture. The creator and scholar Henry Schwarz illustrates how the mobility of those communities, which frequently defied cartographic ordering, gave beginning to colonial frustrations and paranoia of various varieties. Paired with the landed elites, the colonial powers got here to explain such tribes as ‘criminal gangs’ wandering the countryside. The criminalisation of the Bhunjiyas as thieves and poachers in their very own properties echoes this historical past.

There are additionally different resonances with the previous. Even as the federal government was settling particular person forest rights, forests have been being marked for timber manufacturing. Tiger reserves began coming into being to advertise tourism at the price of the folks already residing in and close to them. Across Chhattisgarh, an estimated 21,000 hectares of forest land was systematically diverted for mining between 2006 and 2012. The whole non-tax income reaped by the Chhattisgarh authorities from mining greater than doubled over this era to face at INR 38,353 million between 2010-11.

Digitising conventional borders

Khoj’s grassroots employees, or karyakartas, consider that the namesake promotion of tenurial rights was all the time a part of a technique to curtail entry rights to forests. The experiences of the Bhunjiyas and Kamars have been enough to make the organisation flip its focus from particular person forest rights to neighborhood forest useful resource rights. Whereas the previous rights have been restricted to habitation and self-cultivation, the latter supplied the hope of resurrecting a wider gamut of socio-ecological transactions, together with using forests for seasonal useful resource entry, fuelwood, fodder, primary building materials, grazing, bamboo for crafts and forest water our bodies for fishing. This is of significant significance for Adivasi communities who additionally flip to forests for recreation, festive celebrations, and as websites of formality worship.

In Chhattisgarh’s 2018 state election, the Indian National Congress toppled a Bharatiya Janata Party-led authorities below Raman Singh. Ever since, the Congress-led state authorities has been beneficiant in granting neighborhood forest useful resource rights, in step with the Forest Rights Act. Its provisions grant gram sabhas, the bottom tier in India’s Panchayati Raj framework of native self-government, the powers to reap, regenerate and handle forest produce.

The sole situation for granting neighborhood forest useful resource rights to a gram sabha is that the sources below its care ought to fall inside the ‘traditional borders’ of the village it belongs to. But the popularity of such borders usually follows an arduous path involving confrontation with state-defined borders. “In the said circumstance, we went about doing what we knew best,” Manu Singh Netam, one of many native youths who accompanied retired patwaris within the surveys for settling particular person forest rights claims, stated. “We made PRA maps indicating traditional borders on the ground, using locally available material, and then sketched the same onto chart paper,” he defined. Manu was referring to maps made by way of participatory rural appraisal workouts held within the village squares, an method that improvement professionals are keenly conversant in. But when such participatory maps have been hooked up to software kinds and submitted to the federal government, they usually grew to become a topic of ridicule.

In 2021, Nagari grew to become one of many first peri-urban areas to win neighborhood forest useful resource rights, over a internet space of 4,132 hectares of forest land.

As per process, a survey staff is required to go to each village that information for neighborhood forest useful resource rights. Such groups, beforehand famed for khatia girdawli, now discovered alternatives to precise highhandedness differently. The survey staff that visited Nagesh instructed villagers that their conventional borders have been all over, very like ‘spilt water.’ The survey staff that went to Karlajhar requested locals what ‘compartment numbers’ their borders belonged to. As a part of its colonial legacy, the forest division divides forests into compartments that favour the state’s agendas. Such compartments are used to observe the expansion and output of timber. Intervention varies throughout the compartments relying upon the age and high quality of the timber. Traditional borders, which didn’t match this technique, stood de-legitimated. The staff visiting Kulhadi Ghat additionally demanded to know the size and space in hectares, of the native PRA map. In all such circumstances, the villagers had little or no thought of the way to reply.

This might need been the tip of the villagers’ hopes. But, someday, Beni Puri observed the benefit with which some youthful karyakartas dealt with Android smartphones. “It could put some of my city-bred nephews to shame,” Goswami recalled considering. In 2016, he took a big gamble and despatched three karyakartas – Manu, Saraswati, and Nitish – for coaching in using satellite tv for pc imagery, aerial pictures and geographic data techniques – all of which had turn into extra accessible and inexpensive within the final decade.

From there, Khoj rented a handheld GPS machine. Manu, Saraswati and Nitish visited a set of villages and mapped conventional borders, or what are known as sarhad, with the machine. Elders and monks revealed the sarhad to them throughout prolonged walks, typically unfold over days, explaining how plenty of propitiatory rituals have been performed at such thresholds to ask beneficial forces and energies into the forests of a given village. Saraswati and Nitish stated that using fashionable expertise introduced them right into a extra intimate rapport with the prevailing customs and ritual practices that comprise the materiality of borders than PRA maps alone ever might.

The readings secured on this method have been lastly plotted on a ramshackle pc in Khoj’s humble workplace, within the township of Mainpur, just a few hours’ stroll from Nagesh. “Through continual trial and error, and a thousand calls to our trainers, we finally made our first map,” Nitish stated.

Today, a 24-year-old karyakarta, Harish Netam, does a lot of the mapmaking for Khoj. During my temporary keep on the Khoj workplace, Harish associated how conventional borders are laid out on Google Earth maps to present them pictographic actuality. “Our maps are also superimposed on the cadastral maps of the forest department, which makes it possible to submit the compartment numbers covered, and the area to the nearest decimal,” he added. As a results of these maps, villagers have been capable of fend off queries, insults and insinuations from authorities. Khoj and the villagers who’ve benefitted refer to those maps as nazari nakshas, or visible maps, however contemplating the science, expertise and interplay they contain, these nakshas are greater than merely ocular. They are proof of what the geographer Jeremy W Crampton describes as pluralist and user-friendly ‘geographic visualisations,’ in addition to an effort in constructing native perspective of the panorama – what is named nazariya, however with added nuance.

Democratising the map

 By the tip of 2020, the Chhattisgarh authorities had allotted neighborhood forest useful resource rights to no less than 54 villages throughout 10 districts. This course of has continued apace, however not all such allocations are backed by a cartographic nazariya. This, nevertheless, doesn’t dilute the import of what’s taking place in Kulhadi Ghat, Nagesh, Karlajhar and different locations the place digital maps have performed a task.

Indeed, nazari nakshas paved the best way for Kulhadi Ghat to win its neighborhood forest rights, which apply to over 1,321 hectares, whilst foresters remained considerably immune to this. Nagesh and Karlajhar’s claims, overlaying 1,939 and 1,623 hectares respectively, are presently being processed. Khoj has assisted one other 5 villages within the core space of the tiger reserve – Karhi, Baroli, Joratarai, Masulkhoi and Bahigaon – to achieve neighborhood forest rights. It has additionally prolonged its operations past Gariaband and into the neighbouring district of Dhamtari. In whole, Khoj has helped 103 villages map their borders and file claims.

Tractor-loads of each have been being siphoned away from the forests and offered within the Nagari township space. This was depriving households of their share of forest sources and driving them to take up poorly compensated labour to facilitate useful resource extraction.

“But it is not about the numbers, not even about the map – it is about the process,” Beni instructed me. Saraswati stated that “even at the village level, the maps we develop have the potential to create greater controversy than PRA maps.” She defined that, “right from the start, the administration was hesitant to accept CFRR applications from Nagari nagar panchayat, for the reason that it was classified as a peri-urban area.” Indeed, once I visited Nagari city, in Dhamtari district, there have been ample indicators of fast financial improvement, together with new roads, outlets and eateries. But the realm’s constituent ward sabhas, similar to Tumbahra, Churiyara and Nagari, additionally possess massive populations of Adivasis, a lot of whom reside under the poverty line.

Villagers at Tangapani, a small settlement in Nagri, defined how improvement initiatives in Nagari have been accompanied by extreme stress on sources of sand and gas wooden within the surrounding forests. Tractor-loads of each have been being siphoned away from the forests and offered within the Nagari township space. This was depriving households of their share of forest sources and driving them to take up poorly compensated labour to facilitate useful resource extraction.

From the second participatory mapping utilizing geographic data techniques was launched, there was a way of change, and people benefitting from the established order started to get agitated. “As soon as they gathered that these maps would foster a sense of local ownership of resources and further encourage a bottom-up process of planning, an affluent minority began to complain and disrupt the meetings,” Saraswati stated. This lengthened the method and three ward sabhas have been capable of arrive at a consensus solely after a 12 months. In 2021, Nagari grew to become one of many first peri-urban areas to win neighborhood forest useful resource rights, over a internet space of 4,132 hectares of forest land. The story was splashed throughout newspapers and magazines. Reports in Down to Earth stated that the allocation of neighborhood forest rights in Nagari was marked with intense confrontations over borders to the purpose that it had weakened village establishments.

Saraswati and Nitish stated that using fashionable expertise introduced them right into a extra intimate rapport with the prevailing customs and ritual practices that comprise the materiality of borders than PRA maps alone ever might.

From my very own conversations, I gathered that the method had modified the very creativeness of maps in native minds. Maps have been now not static – made as soon as by the state and handed all the way down to the folks to abide by thereafter. Rather, they’ve turn into consultant artefacts that may be debated, mentioned and even modified. Some conventional borders have been additionally altered as a part of Khoj’s strategy of mapmaking, proving that traditions usually are not frozen in time. Through such deliberations and friction, maps acquired a democratic character, gained neighborhood backing and have become receptacles of collective rights. Here, they went from being devices of management to devices of collaboration and collective motion.

This grew to become obvious within the months after the rights have been allotted. Beat guards in Nagari, accustomed to taking part in custodians, have been abruptly disturbed by how the villagers have been taking the legislation into their very own palms to stop the industrial sale of gas wooden and sand on the town areas. Subhas, a youth from Tumbahra, stated that after, when challenged by forest guards, “we flipped out our maps and showed the beat guards the limit of their jurisdiction.”

Reports of such cartographic resistance usually are not restricted to Nagari. Salhebhat village, in Gariaband, received neighborhood rights over 674 hectares of forest at roughly the identical time as Nagari secured its rights. Residents of Salhebhat not too long ago used their nazari naksha to indicate that foresters have been mistakenly burning shrubs inside their allotted space. They additionally knowledgeable the foresters of how the involved shrubs have been a part of the meals chain and behavior for native wildlife, significantly leopards and snakes. At Kulhadi Ghat, the naksha proved helpful in resisting the department-driven plantation of sal timber in choose compartment numbers that fell inside the village’s conventional borders. The native Kamars objected to the plantation on the grounds that it disturbed the present floral composition and, in consequence, honey manufacturing.

The making of nazari nakshas stays a extremely interactive course of the place village-level customers each work as cartographers and revisualise their landscapes as essential first steps in establishing a conservation agenda. Seeing this course of in motion is a reminder that the social historical past and anthropology of maps can do a lot to ‘denaturalise’ borders. It can additional serve to disturb, as Edney suggests, the misleading “shell of objectivity” that surrounds the state’s maps, and maps generally. Nazari nakshas level to how applied sciences developed on the behest of the triumvirate of the state, empire and capital might be claimed by Adivasi communities to claim native autonomy. This assertion could make maps, and mapmaking, extra pluralist, interactive and democratic.

***