Peter Watts is the creator of a few of the darkest and most completely researched science fiction novels ever written. One of his early followers was horror creator Theresa DeLucci, who learn his debut novel Starfish whereas working at Tor Books within the early 2000s.

“I had never really read a lot of hard science fiction, but his concepts really intrigued me, and the editor at the time told me that it was really, really dark, and he thought that I would like it, and he was absolutely correct,” DeLucci says in Episode 551 of the Geek’s Guide to the Galaxy podcast.

Watts is greatest identified for his 2006 novel Blindsight, a couple of crew of augmented people who’re despatched to intercept an alien vessel. Science fiction creator Sam J. Miller says that Blindsight options a few of the best-written aliens in all of science fiction. “One of the things that this book—and Peter Watts in general—does really well is imagining the alien in a way that feels real and true,” he says. “I feel like I can count on less than two hands how many times—in all the science fiction that I’ve consumed—how many times something really feels alien, as opposed to the Star Trek model of ‘a green-skinned person.’”

Fantasy creator Seth Dickinson says that a lot of the ability of Blindsight comes from its insights into the workings of the human thoughts. After publicity to alien expertise, the characters within the e book develop into bothered with circumstances comparable to Cotard’s syndrome, which makes an individual consider they’re already lifeless. “There’s a meter in your head that says, ‘This thing I’m looking at is part of me,’ and if that meter glitches out and tells you when you look at your arm, ‘This thing isn’t mine,’ you’ll believe that,” Dickinson says. “This is not to say I wholeheartedly agree with everything Blindsight argues about human cognition, but it does a really, really good job of using the weirdness of the human mind gone awry as a source of horror and thrills.”

And whereas Blindsight is an undeniably good e book, it’s something however mild studying. Geek’s Guide to the Galaxy host David Barr Kirtley warns that some readers could also be postpone by the e book’s dense scientific jargon. “If you’re a hard science fiction fan, this is going to be your favorite book—or one of your favorite books—of all time,” he says. “But this is not, in my opinion, a book to give to someone who is not a science fiction reader to convince them to read science fiction.”

Listen to the whole interview with Theresa DeLucci, Sam J. Miller, and Seth Dickinson in Episode 551 of Geek’s Guide to the Galaxy (above). And try some highlights from the dialogue under.

Sam J. Miller on “The Things”:

I had a extremely formative expertise with the [Peter Watts] quick story “The Things.” The Thing is one in every of my favourite films, and apart from the truth that “The Things” is a superb story, it’s such a badass transfer to simply be like, “I’m going to totally write fanfic about this IP, and I’m going to publish it, and it’s going to be amazing.” That was a giant inspiration for me, as a result of I even have a number of robust emotions about The Thing, and I wrote a narrative referred to as “Things with Beards,” which was additionally revealed in Clarkesworld, the place “The Things” was revealed. It obtained a Nebula nomination, and it’s one of many issues that I’m extra pleased with of mine. So yeah, Peter Watts gave me permission to put in writing The Thing fanfic.

Seth Dickinson on thriller:

There is a lot recommendation in any artwork in regards to the uncanny or the bizarre or the creepy that the much less you reveal the higher. There’s even this mystery box ideology—like J.J. Abrams—that the field is all the time extra attention-grabbing when it’s closed. You give hints of the monster however you don’t present it. And one factor I actually admire about this e book, although I feel it has its structural issues, is he opens the field up all the best way, and his reply to “the reader’s imagination about what is in the box is always going to be scarier than what you show them” is “No! I imagined something even scarier. Here it is. Take a look. Here’s my footnotes.” I actually admire that.

Theresa DeLucci on characterization:

What I really like about Peter Watts novels is that he all the time does have these troublesome characters. He has a number of empathy for abuse and trauma survivors, and all the characters on the ship actually have that of their background. It was one thing that was very specific within the Rifters sequence. … On the floor Peter Watts all the time has this sort of misanthropic approach of speaking about people sooner or later, and it appears not a number of hope. But it’s there, in how the characters react to one another, how they play off of one another. It’s human, and it feels lifelike and well-drawn. There is an underlying empathy there, if there’s not all the time hope.

Seth Dickinson on originality:

So usually with horror, you get a beautiful opening after which all of it falls aside after they reveal the monster or the killer or no matter. And it’s even tougher to do in science fiction as a result of there’s such a—for a literature of concepts—such a small set of solutions that normally will get given to the query, “What are the aliens like?” “Oh, they’re a hive mind.” “They’re nanites.” There’s not so much actually new. And so although Blindsight is properly greater than a decade previous at this level, it’s simply a type of books I learn the place I used to be like, “Damn, I have never read anything like this before.” And I crave that. If anyone else finds extra stuff like that, ship it to me.

Get More From WIRED

Go Back to Top. Skip To: Start of Article.