The assertion launched by Ministry of Finance
on 8^th June, 2020 has proposed to
decriminalize quite a few financial offences and certainly one of such
offences is the offence underneath Sec 138 of Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonor of cheque. The Ministry
has invited feedback of stakeholders newest by June 23, 2020 on the
decriminalization of 19 legislations as proposed.

ESSENCE OF THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED

The uncertainty and tedious decision of authorized proceedings has
disturbed the benefit of doing enterprise within the nation. In order to
resolve this challenge of ambiguity and pendency of fits in all
courts, the federal government is inclined in the direction of having a balanced
laws. In the brand new laws, the offences that are much less
severe in nature shall be compounded collectively and the criminals
having a mala fide intention shall be punished as nicely.

Criminal penalties for minor offences inclusive of punishment of
imprisonment seems to be foremost motive why each home and
international traders chorus from investing in India. Thus, authorities
has continuously been longing on having an apposite measure to
reinstate the belief in doing enterprise.

Moving ahead with the target of ‘Sabka Saath, Sabka
Vikas and Sabka Vishwas’, the federal government has taken the
vital step of decriminalization of minor offences and has
anticipated the identical to offer ease in doing enterprise within the lengthy
run. It can also be anticipated to improvise the tedious system of authorized
proceedings.

LAWS PROPOSED TO BE DECRIMINALIZED

Various sections of various legal guidelines have been introduced underneath the
ambit of this notification as a way to encourage companies swiftly
drift over the disaster attributable to the pandemic outbreak. These
legislations are as follows:

• Insurance Act 1938 (Section 12)




• SARFAESI Act 2002 (Section 29)




• PFRDA Act, 2013 ( Section 16(7) and
  32(1)




• RBI Act, 1934 (Section 58B)




• Payment and Settlement Systems Act,
  2007 (Section 26(1) and 26(4)




• NABARD Act, 1981 (Section 56(1)




• NHB Act, 1987 (Section 49)




• State Financial Corporations Act,
  1951 (Section 42)




• Credit Information Companies
  (Regulation) Act, 2005 (Section 23)




• Factoring Regulation Act, 2011
  (Section 23)




• Actuaries Act, 2006 (Section 37)




• Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (Section
  36AD(2),and 46)




• General Insurance Business
  (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 (Section 30)




• LIC Act, 1956 (Section 40)




• Banning of Unregulated Deposit
  Schemes Act, 2019 (Section 21),




• Chit funds Act, 1982 ( Section
  76)




• DICGC Act, 1961 (Section 47)




• Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
  (Section 138)




• Prize Chits and Money Circulation
  Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 (Section 4 and 5).

ACTION SUGGESTED BY THE NOTIFICATION

Based on the suggestions obtained by feedback from State
Governments, Union Territory Administrations, civil societies,
academicians, private and non-private sector organizations and members
of the general public, the Ministry shall determine which particular sections
ought to stay as a felony offence attracting penalty and which
one needs to be altered to be decriminalized as a way to enhance the
ease of doing enterprise in India.

The Ministry prompt that on account of improve in burden on
companies due to non-compliances and minor lapses in felony
proceedings, sure rules needs to be saved in thoughts whereas
re-looking on the provisions and reclassifying them as compoundable
offences that are merely procedural in nature and haven’t any impact
on nationwide safety or public curiosity in any respect. These rules
are as follows:

1. Mens rea (malafide/
   felony intent) performs an vital position in imposition of felony
   legal responsibility, due to this fact, it’s vital to judge nature of
   non-compliance, i.e. fraud as in comparison with negligence or inadvertent
   omission;




2. The ordinary nature
   of non-compliance;




3. Decrease the burden on
   companies and encourage confidence amongst traders;
   and




4. Focus on financial development,
   public curiosity and nationwide safety ought to stay
   paramount.

CONCLUSION

Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 governs cheque
bounce issues on account of insufficiency of funds within the checking account.
The provision offers that any one that has dedicated an offence
underneath Section 138 the offence shall be imprisoned for a time period which
might prolong as much as 2 years or with nice which can prolong to twice the
quantity of the cheque quantity, or with each. The part is certainly one of
the commonest provisions invoked by lender within the occasion of
default on account of dishonor of cheque. 

However, on one hand the federal government has tried inserting Section
143, 148 to call just a few within the NI Act to make it extra operative for
offering redressal and however, the federal government is making an attempt
to dilute the act by decriminalizing the availability.

Co-Chairman of Bar Council of Delhi, Mr. Sanjay Rathi, issued a
letter not too long ago to Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman, Union Minister of
Finance, Government of India stating that the Bar Council of Delhi
strongly opposes the decriminalization of provisions of the
legislations as put ahead by the notification.

The statutory physique representing legal professionals, referred the
213^th Law Commission Report together with Sec 138 of
NI Act and some current databases and talked about {that a} sure
stipulated proportion of litigation pending within the courts comprise
of cheque dishonor instances. The notification relating to
decriminalization would definitely assist in brining down the chart
relating to variety of instances however would by no means serve the primary object of
Section 138 of the NI Act.

Adding to this, Bar Council of India’s Member Mr. Ved
Prakash Sharma has stated in his assertion through his Social media
deal with that the Bar Council of India will oppose the motion of
authorities relating to decriminalizing the actual sections
by a General Council assembly to be held on 14^th
June, 2020.

The motion put ahead by the federal government is self-contradictory.
Even although this step will certainly entice quite a few
traders, present reduction to those that thought of this felony
legal responsibility as an enormous concern and can assist in reviving the financial
development put up COVID 19 however this might additionally result in a scenario the place
there could be worry of felony litigation and imprisonment within the
minds of the perpetrators committing such offences.

The content material of this text is meant to offer a normal
information to the subject material. Specialist recommendation needs to be sought
about your particular circumstances.

This content material is only a tutorial evaluation underneath
“Legal intelligence series”.

© Copyright AMLEGALS.

Disclaimer: The info contained on this doc is
supposed for informational functions solely and doesn’t represent
authorized opinion, recommendation or any commercial. This doc isn’t
supposed to deal with the circumstances of any explicit particular person
or company physique. Readers shouldn’t act on the knowledge
supplied herein with out acceptable skilled recommendation after a
thorough examination of the details and circumstances of a specific
scenario. There may be no assurance that the
judicial/quasi-judicial authorities might not take a place
opposite to the views talked about herein.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Criminal Law from India