In this courtroom sketch, Elon Musk, left, with shareholder lawyer Nicholas Porritt, seems in federal court docket in San Francisco on Friday.

Vicki Behringer/AP

conceal caption

toggle caption

Vicki Behringer/AP

In this courtroom sketch, Elon Musk, left, with shareholder lawyer Nicholas Porritt, seems in federal court docket in San Francisco on Friday.

Vicki Behringer/AP

SAN FRANCISCO — Elon Musk took the witness stand Friday to defend a 2018 tweet claiming he had lined up the financing to take Tesla personal in a deal that by no means got here near taking place.

The tweet resulted in a $40 million settlement with securities regulators. It additionally led to a class-action lawsuit alleging he misled buyers, pulling him into court docket for a few half hour Friday to ship sworn testimony in entrance of a nine-person jury and a full room of media and different spectators.

The trial was then adjourned for the weekend and Musk was advised to return Monday to reply extra questions.

In his preliminary look on the stand, Musk defended his prolific tweeting as “the most democratic way” to distribute info even whereas acknowledging constraints of Twitter’s 280-character restrict could make it troublesome to make every thing as clear as doable.

“I think you can absolutely be truthful (on Twitter),” Musk asserted on the stand. “But can you be comprehensive? Of course not.”

Musk’s newest headache stems from the inherent brevity on Twitter, a service that he has been working since finishing his $44 billion buy of it in October.

The trial hinges on the query of whether or not a pair of tweets that Musk posted on Aug. 7, 2018, broken Tesla shareholders throughout a 10-day interval main as much as a Musk admission that the buyout he had envisioned wasn’t going to occur.

In the primary of these these two 2018 tweets, Musk stated “funding secured” for a what would have been a $72 billion buyout of Tesla at a time when the electrical automaker was nonetheless grappling with manufacturing issues and was price far lower than it’s now. Musk adopted up just a few hours later with another tweet suggesting a deal was imminent.

After it turned obvious that the cash wasn’t in place to take Tesla personal, Musk stepped down as Tesla’s chairman whereas remaining CEO as a part of the Securities and Exchange Commission settlement, with out acknowledging any wrongdoing.

The impulsive billionaire got here into court docket sporting a darkish swimsuit and tie on the third day of the civil trial in San Francisco that his lawyer unsuccessfully tried to maneuver to Texas, the place Tesla is now headquartered, on the premise that media protection of his tumultuous takeover of Twitter had tainted the jury pool.

The jury that was assembled earlier this week centered intently on Musk whereas he answered questions posed by Nicholas Porritt, a lawyer representing Tesla shareholders. At one level, Musk requested Porritt if he would converse nearer to the microphone so he might hear him higher. At different occasions, Musk craned his neck as he gazed across the courtroom.

Musk, 51, mentioned he cares “a great deal” about buyers and likewise railed towards quick sellers who make investments that reward them when an organization’s inventory value falls. He referred to as quick promoting an “evil” follow that needs to be outlawed, denigrating those that revenue from it as “a bunch of sharks.”

When proven communications from Tesla buyers urging him to curtail or fully cease his Twitter behavior earlier than the 2018 buyout tweet, Musk mentioned he could not keep in mind all these interactions from years in the past, particularly since he will get a “Niagara Falls” of emails.

Even earlier than Musk took the stand, U.S. District Judge Edward Chen had declared that the jurors can think about these two tweets to be false, leaving them to resolve whether or not Musk intentionally deceived buyers and whether or not his statements saddled them with losses.

Musk has beforehand contended he entered into the SEC settlement below duress and maintained he believed he had locked up monetary backing for a Tesla buyout throughout conferences with representatives from Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund.

An skilled on company buyouts employed by shareholder attorneys to review the occasions surrounding Musk’s proposal to take Tesla personal spent the majority of his three hours on the stand Friday deriding the plan as an ill-conceived idea.

“This proposal was an extreme outlier,” mentioned Guhan Subramanian, a Harvard University enterprise and regulation professor for greater than 20 years. “It was incoherent. It was illusory.”

In a prolonged cross examination that delayed Musk’s look, a lawyer for Tesla’s board of administrators tried to undermine Subramanian’s testimony by mentioning that it relied on graduate scholar help to overview a number of the materials associated to the August 2018 tweets. The lawyer, William Price, additionally famous Subramanian’s $1,900-per-hour charge for compiling his report for the case.

The trial over his Tesla tweets come at a time when Musk has been specializing in Twitter whereas additionally serving because the automaker’s CEO and likewise remaining deeply concerned in SpaceX, the rocket ship firm he based.

Musk’s management of Twitter — the place he has gutted the workers and alienated customers and advertisers — has confirmed unpopular amongst Tesla’s present stockholders, who’re apprehensive he has been devoting much less time steering the automaker at a time of intensifying competitors. Those issues contributed to a 65% decline in Tesla’s inventory final yr that worn out greater than $700 billion in shareholder wealth — excess of the $14 billion swing in fortune that occurred between the corporate’s excessive and low inventory costs throughout the Aug. 7-17, 2018 interval coated within the class-action lawsuit.

Tesla’s inventory has cut up twice since then, making the $420 buyout value cited in his 2018 tweet price $28 on adjusted foundation now. The firm’s shares have been buying and selling round $133.42 Friday, down from the corporate’s November 2021 split-adjusted peak of $414.50.

After Musk dropped the thought of a Tesla buyout, the corporate overcame its manufacturing issues, leading to a fast upturn in automobile gross sales that precipitated its inventory to soar and minted Musk because the world’s richest individual till he purchased Twitter. Musk dropped from the highest spot on the wealth listing after the inventory market’s backlash to his dealing with of Twitter.

When requested Friday in regards to the challenges that Tesla confronted in 2018, he recalled spending many nights sleeping on the automaker’s California manufacturing facility as he tried to maintain the corporate afloat.

“The sheer level of pain to make Tesla successful during that 2017, 2018 period was excruciating,” he recalled.