The potential for glitches alone will provide suspense, but so will the honors. With the coronavirus turning so many of us into morose shut-ins, the small screen’s wealth of shows and performances has provided a key distraction.

TV academy voters have a chance to reward the best of the best and to recognize change. The streaming-induced growth of content opened doors to more trophy-worthy projects from those too often ignored, including people of color and women.

Against that backdrop, Associated Press Television Writer Lynn Elber and AP Entertainment Writer Mark Kennedy offer their predictions in the top categories — but accept zero blame for virtual office-pool betting losses.

Nominees: “Better Call Saul”; “The Crown”; “Killing Eve”; “The Handmaid’s Tale”; “The Mandalorian”; “Ozark”; “Stranger Things”; “Succession.”

Should win: “Ozark.” Like the much-honored “Breaking Bad,” this morality play is woven out of family dysfunction and brutal criminality, masterfully written and acted.

Will win: “Succession.” A brassy, sexy power struggle that has the scope Emmy voters expect from a top drama, with bonus points for the au courant media empire setting.

Should win: “The Crown,” There’s simply been no dip in service from this historical drama, with the writing and acting consistently superb. Last season was quirky, ranging from Prince Charles awkwardly learning Welsh to the way it handled the disaster at a coal-mining town. I bow.

Will win: “Succession.” Think of this show as our American version of “The Crown,” except we do our successions noisily and arrogantly and the Brits do it by blood and far more elegantly.

Nominees: “Curb Your Enthusiasm”; “Dead to Me”; “The Good Place”; “Insecure”; “The Kominsky Method”; “The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel”; “Schitt’s Creek”; “What We Do in the Shadows.”

Should win: “Schitt’s Creek.” It’s silly, loving and open-minded. Can’t we all use that good medicine now?

Will win: “Schitt’s Creek.” No way I would have said so before last year’s surprise (and far worthier) “Fleabag” victory, but Emmy voters have a soft spot for idiosyncrasy.

Should win: “Schitt’s Creek,” but not enthusiastically.

Will win: “Schitt’s Creek.” In a weak category this year with lots of one-trick ponies and repetitive skits, this fish-out-of-water show is the only one really beloved by voters. Not necessarily for its content, mind you.

Nominees: Jason Bateman, “Ozark”; Sterling K. Brown, “This is Us”; Billy Porter, “Pose”; Jeremy Strong, “Succession”; Brian Cox, “Succession”; Steve Carell, “The Morning Show.”

Should win: Porter. His victory last year, as the first openly gay man to be honored as best drama actor, was both historic and artistic. He deserves it again.

Will win: Strong. His emotional tapdance as the wannabe heir is worthy, but I’ll use my caveat chit here: He and Cox could split the “Succession” vote, giving gear-shifting Carell an opening.

Should win: Carell and Bateman both showed, again, that in addition to having huge comedy chops, they are also excellent dramatic actors. I give the edge to Carell, who adds a ferociousness to his disgraced character.

Will win: Strong. His hangdog, needy and slightly dim bro role on “Succession” is exactly what we need right now.

Nominees: Jennifer Aniston, “The Morning Show”; Olivia Colman, “The Crown”; Jodie Comer, “Killing Eve”; Laura Linney, “Ozark”; Sandra Oh, “Killing Eve”; Zendaya, “Euphoria.”

Should win: Linney. An actor of impeccable subtlety gets to sink her teeth into a deeply flawed character. Lucky us.

Will win: Linney. She lost out last year to Comer, but this season of “Ozark” was her showcase and she’ll prevail despite an impressive field that includes Aniston in an against-type role.

Should win: Zendaya. Zendaya. Zendaya. In “Euphoria,” she is remarkable.

Will win: Linney. One of the most underappreciated actors working today.

Nominees: Anthony Anderson, “black-ish”; Don Cheadle, “Black Monday”; Ted Danson, “The Good Place”; Michael Douglas, “The Kominsky Method”; Eugene Levy, “Schitt’s Creek”; Ramy Youssef, “Ramy.”

Should win: Danson. Dying is easy, comedy is hard — except to this effortless master of the sitcom, whether based in a bar (“Cheers”) or the afterlife.

Will win: Levy. He’s playing new notes in his longstanding, finely tuned comedic partnership with co-star Catherine O’Hara, and it will pay off.

Should win: Anderson. He has never won an acting Emmy for “black-ish” and that’s not cool. His blustery, stubborn and yet entirely sweet patriarch is at the center of the show.

Will win: Levy. He simply has the most expressive eyebrows on TV.

Nominees: Christina Applegate, “Dead to Me”; Rachel Brosnahan, “The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel”; Linda Cardellini, “Dead to Me”; Catherine O’Hara, “Schitt’s Creek”; Issa Rae, “Insecure”; Tracee Ellis Ross, “black-ish.”

Should win: O’Hara. As I said last year, although no one listened, her “delectably self-absorbed, absurd Moira” stands atop a Mount Rushmore of her inventive portrayals.

Will win: O’Hara. Resistance is futile, Emmy, despite perhaps the strongest of all fields this year. You belong to her.

Should win: Rae. The HBO comedy’s creator and star’s work on “Insecure” needs to be celebrated.

Will win: O’Hara. Like it was said before, resistance is futile.

Nominees: “Little Fires Everywhere”; “Mrs. America”; “Unbelievable”; ”Unorthodox”; “Watchmen.”

Should win: “Watchmen.” An ambitious interpretation of a highly regarded graphic novel, one prescient in its connection with today’s bleak zeitgeist.

Will win: “Watchmen.” While second-wave feminist history “Mrs. America” is worthy competition, the daring and currency of “Watchmen” is insurmountable.

Should win: “Watchmen” — bold, complex storytelling. But it may be a little too enigmatic for a mainstream audience. A warning was that it earned not even a single Golden Globe nod.

Will win: “Watchmen,” though “Little Fires Everywhere,” in a surprise, could pull it out. That show ruthlessly explored class, race, privilege and separated families — how very, very 2020.