[ad_1]
Former leisure journalist turned YouTuber Lee Jin Ho has voiced sharp criticism in opposition to the manufacturing workforce of SBS‘ ‘Unanswered Questions,’ accusing them of mishandling essential content material.
In his assertion in his newest YouTube video, Lee Jin Ho highlighted the central situation of whether or not ‘Unanswered Question’ correctly delved into the difficulty of whether or not a third social gathering actually tried to poach FIFTY FIFTY and the difficulty on the trademark rights.
He identified that little or no knowledge relating to exterior third-party involvement was revealed on ‘Unanswered Questions.’
Lee Jin Ho started by saying, “The Givers held an internal meeting on June 9. If you look at the meeting content transcript, there are many things that induce goosebumps.”
He added, “These were crucial information but ‘Unanswered Questions’ only covered the content for 3 seconds. If you look at the meeting transcript on June 9, The Givers state they (FIFTY FIFTY) need a new social media account to manage and operate. However, the service contract between The Givers and ATTRAKT was terminated as of May 31.”
Lee Jin Ho identified that the service contract between The Givers and ATTRAKT had already been terminated when the group went on a hiatus as a consequence of Aran’s surgical procedure. But the Givers had been planning to open a brand new social media web page for FIFTY FIFTY, which already has one that’s owned by ATTRAKT.
Not solely that the assembly content material revealed that The Givers had been in dialogue concerning the OST for the ‘Barbie’ film, regardless of the service contract already being terminated, and director Baek of The Givers mentioned they need to not talk with CEO Jun Hong Joon anymore.
Lee Jin Ho defined, “ATTRAKT sent this data to ‘Unanswered Questions’ hoping that they would handle this crucial piece of information well. However, ‘Unanswered Questions’ covered it for only 3 seconds.”
The YouTuber additionally identified that the nameless informant who appeared on ‘Unanswered Questions’ claimed that “the girls are not at fault and CEO Jun Hong Joon didn’t even attend any of the monthly assessments.” Lee Jin Ho defined he checked with ATTRAKT in regard to the informant however ATTRAKT claimed they have no idea that individual.
Additionally, Lee Jin Ho discovered that CEO Jun had attended each single month-to-month analysis because it was an essential strategy of selecting the members. ATTRAKT defined, “If CEO Jun wasn’t able to attend the monthly evaluation, we didn’t hold the evaluation as well.” Lee Jin Ho additionally identified that there was proof that CEO Jun attended the month-to-month analysis as a result of he personally recorded the analysis on his cellphone.
The YouTuber criticized, “To be honest, ‘Unanswered Questions’ could sufficiently check the identity of this informant and the information he shared. However, they didn’t check the facts and released the episode.”
Lee Jin Ho additionally claimed that ‘Unanswered Questions’ additionally had an interview with a person in regard to the trademark situation. However, the present fully edited this half out. Lee Jin Ho alleged that the interview was edited out as a result of it additionally had key info proving whether or not a 3rd social gathering was truly concerned or not.
Meanwhile, ‘Unanswered Questions’ launched an episode on August 19 protecting the FIFTY FIFTY controversy.
After the episode’s premiere, many Korean viewers criticized that the show focused too much on emotional aspects and didn’t deal with the data in an unbiased method.
They criticize the present saying, “The show only reported the story of one side and didn’t really bring out solid evidence to support their claims,” “They didn’t release CEO Jun Hong Joon’s side,” and “Didn’t mention anything about their trademark issue.”
[adinserter block=”4″]
[ad_2]
Source link