Some current stories point out that Nvidia is finally, truly done making GTX graphics cards, with the final GTX 16-series playing cards leaving the fab. Seven years after the corporate adopted up its extremely profitable GTX 10-series with the rebooted RTX branding, how has the PC gaming panorama modified? Did ray tracing make the splash that Nvidia hoped for? PCWorld’s Keith May is right here to reply these questions in his newest video essay on our YouTube channel.

The change to the RTX 20-series and its follow-ups are well-known (or notorious, for those who favor) for 2 issues. One, Nvidia’s push for making real-time ray tracing and different superior lighting a part of the usual for gaming. And two, being really, really expensive — in some methods, the value of graphics playing cards is barely now beginning to recuperate from the massive leap of the preliminary RTX playing cards and the crypto-fueled scarcity that adopted thereafter.

But Keith argues that it’s a extra delicate expertise that made an even bigger affect. Nvidia’s Deep Learning Super Sampling, a extra superior model of software-powered upscaling, wasn’t successful at first. In its debut model DLSS was a little bit of a blurry mess, and avid gamers weren’t onboard with this try to allow ray tracing with out the large efficiency affect. But DLSS 2.0 and three.0 have made large enhancements, to the purpose that ray tracing is attainable on a a lot wider array of {hardware}.

Competitors AMD and Intel had been pressured to create their very own variations of high-powered upscaling (FSR and XeSS, respectively), and are nonetheless lagging behind by most measures. Considering the uproar when Bethesda’s Starfield launched without immediate support for DLSS, I believe Keith’s place that superior upscaling has been the actual game-changer is straightforward to defend.

For extra insights on PC {hardware} and gaming, make sure to subscribe to PCWorld on YouTube.