[ad_1]
Selection of RT-RAA amplification primers and HIV-1 RNA nucleic acid goal, improvement of ERASE detection technique for HIV-1 RNA
In this examine, a fast nucleic acid detection assay for HIV-1 RNA was developed primarily based on the ERASE technique for COVID-19 detection established by our collaborator (Fig. 1A). First, HIV-1 RNA extracted from plasma samples was amplified by the RT-RAA expertise for 30 min, the amplified merchandise had been then added to the CRISPR-Cas13a system. Second, within the CIRSPR/Cas13a system, Cas13a-crRNA advanced acknowledged the goal RNA sequence particularly and activated the cleavage exercise of Cas13a. Third, Cas13a sliced the encircling reporter RNA nonspecifically, the outcomes will be measured by a following fluorescence assay or side-flow strips instantly.
To develop the RT-RAA-CRISPR-Cas13a assay for detecting HIV-1 RNA, 5086 full genomic sequences of HIV-1 had been downloaded from the HIV community database (http://www.hiv.lanl.gov, launched in 2018) after which in comparison with the genomic sequences in MEGA7.0 and Jalview1.83, 9 pairs of RT-RAA primers and 4 crRNA had been designed (Fig. 1B, Table S1). A extremely conserved sequence (4620-4922 bp) had been screened within the HIV pol area (Table S2) and the plasmid of a HIV-1 customary pressure Psmart-LC (KanR) (GenBank ID: k03455.1) was constructed.
For screening the RT-RAA primers, a serial of diluted HIV-1 RNA templates (1 × 106–1 × 100 copies/μL) had been used for RT-RAA amplification, the amplified merchandise had been then analyzed by electrophoresis. The outcomes confirmed that each one the 9 pairs of RT-RAA primers had been capable of amplify HIV-1 RNA by RT-RAA with the RNA template focus at 1 × 106 copies/μL, solely F3&R2 primers amplified a weaker HIV-1 RNA band (179 bp) with the RNA template focus was 1 × 102 copies/μL, the opposite 8 pairs of RT-RAA primers didn’t amplify any goal RNA by RT-RAA (Fig. 2A). Therefore, F3&R2 primer had been chosen as one of the best RT-RAA primers for this examine. Next, HIV-1 RNA templates with focus of 105 copies/μL and 1 copy/μL had been used for RT-RAA amplification respectively and the amplified merchandise had been then detected by CRISPR-based fluorescence assay for screening crRNA.
The outcomes confirmed that when the template RNA focus was 105 copies/μL, after 1 h, the typical fluoresence depth of the 4 crRNA reactions, which had been 103.00 ± 80.42 (a.u.), 8296.00 ± 131.10 (a.u.), 15701.00 ± 478.90 (a.u.) and 14145.00 ± 356.80 (a.u.) respectively had been vital increased than the unfavorable management 259.33 (a.u.) (Fig. 2B). When the template RNA focus was 1 copy/μL, after 1 h, the typical fluoresence depth of the 4 crRNA reactions had been 64.00 ± 5.90 (a.u.), 306.30 ± 7.81 (a.u.), 7496.00 ± 37.68 (a.u.) and 801.30 ± 33.52 (a.u.), whereas the unfavorable management was 246 ± 7.93 (a.u.) (Fig. 2B). Therefore, the crRNA-3 which had the best fluorescence depth was chosen because the nucleic acid detection goal for subsequent experiments.
Sensitivity of the CRISPR-based lateral-flow strip assay for detecting HIV-1 RNA
To consider the sensitivity of the our developed CRISPR-based lateral-flow strip assay for detecting HIV-1 RNA (Fig. 3), a serially diluted HIV-1 RNA templates (1 × 103–1 × 10–1 copies/μL) had been measured by CRISPR-based fluorescence assay, CRISPR-based lateral-flow strip assay, RT-qPCR, RT-PCR and RT-RAA amplification. The outcomes confirmed that the sensitivity of the CRISPR-based fluorescence assay reached 1 copy/μL in 10 min (Supplementary Figure S2) and the restrict of detection (LOD) was 1 × 10–1 copies/μL at 1 h (detected twice in 3 impartial repeated trials) (Fig. 4A and B). CRISPR-based lateral-flow strip assay outcomes indicated that when the template RNA focus was 1 copy/μL, solely the C line will be captured however the T line pale away in 2 min, this was acknowledged as a optimistic consequence. When the template RNA focus was 1 × 10–1 copies/μL, each C line and T line will be visualized, this was acknowledged as a unfavorable consequence. So, the sensitivity of CRISPR-based lateral-flow strip assay for detecting HIV-1 RNA was 1 copy/μL (Fig. 4C and D). Similar outcomes had been discovered utilizing RT-qPCR and RT-PCR, each of them had been capable of steadily detect the template RNA at focus of 1 copy/μL (Fig. 4E-G). The LOD of the RT-RAA technique was 1 × 102copies /μL for HIV-1 RNA detection (Fig. 4H).
The outcomes of evaluating the sensitivity of CRISPR-based lateral-flow strip and CRISPR-based fluorescence assay had been proven in Fig. 4A-D. The fluorescence depth of the HIV-1 RNA with focus of 1 × 103, 1 × 102, 1 × 101, 1 × 100 and 1 × 10–1 copies/μL all elevated because the response time lapsed, after 40 min, the typical fluorescence depth of all of the HIV-1 RNA reactions with completely different focus talked about above, which had been 26921 ± 827.3 (a.u.), 17107 ± 1111 (a.u.), 7031 ± 744.1 (a.u.), 4115 ± 250.0 (a.u.) and 1780 ± 913.3 (a.u.), had been vital increased than the unfavorable management which was 450.00 ± 1.00 (a.u.), no apparent fluorescence indicators had been detected within the group with the goal RNA focus of 1 × 10–1 copies/μL and the unfavorable management group. It indicated that the CRISPR-based lateral-flow strip assay and CRISPR-based fluorescence assay shared the identical sensitivity when detecting HIV-1 RNA.
The serially diluted HIV-1 RNA templates (1 × 103–1 × 10–1 copies/μL) had been used to judge the sensitivity of RT-qPCR, RT-PCR and RT-RAA amplification for detecting HIV RNA (Fig. 4E-H), the sensitivity of the RT-qPCR was 1 × 100 copies/μL and the LOD of the RT-RAA amplification assay was 1 × 102 copies/μL. The outcomes confirmed that the sensitivity of CRISPR-based lateral-flow strip assay was in keeping with the RT-PCR and RT-qPCR, however increased than the RT-RAA amplification assay.
The specificity analysis of CRISPR-based lateral-flow strip assay for detecting HIV-1 RNA
In order to detect the foremost HIV-1 strains worldwide by the CRISPR-Cas13a system, degenerate primers of RT-RAA and crRNA was launched into the HIV-1 pol area (Fig. 5A) to enhance the specificity of the tactic. Then 4 pathogens together with Coxiella burnetiid (Cb), Hepatitis B virus (HBV), Ebola virus (EBOV) and Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) had been in contrast with HIV-1 by CRISPR-based fluorescence assay and CRISPR-based lateral-flow strip assay on this examine, the outcomes of CRISPR-based fluorescence assay confirmed that the fluorescence depth of HIV-1 reached 3773.00 ± 62.02 (a.u.) after 10 min, it was considerably increased than the fluorescence depth of the nucleic acids of different 4 pathogens (P˂0.05) (Fig. 5B). The fluorescence depth of HIV-1 detection was enhanced quantitatively and stabilized after 1 h, and no vital cross-reaction with different pathogens was noticed (Fig. 5C). The CRISPR-based lateral-flow strip assay confirmed that solely the HIV-1 RNA detection was optimistic (T line pale away and C line appeared), the opposite 4 pathogens had been all unfavorable (Both C line and T line will be noticed) (Fig. 5D and E).
Evaluation of the CRISPR-based lateral-flow strip assay by scientific samples
The HIV check kits, RT-qPCR HIV-1 response equipment, used for scientific samples had been bought from the DaAn Gene Co., Ltd. of Sun Yat-sen University. 158 scientific samples from 110 HIV-1-positive sufferers (Ct values assorted from 20 to 40) and 48 HIV-1-negative people had been used to judge the effectiveness of the CRISPR-based lateral-flow strip assay developed on this examine (Fig. 6 and Table 1). All the scientific samples had been detected by the CRISPR-based fluorescence assay and lateral-flow strip CRISPR assay respectively (Supplementary Figure S4).
Compared with RT-qPCR, the optimistic fee of CRISPR-based lateral-flow strip assay for detecting HIV-1 RNA was 91.81% (101/110) and the unfavorable fee was 100% (48/48), the general scientific compliance fee was 94.3% with the Kappa worth of 0.872 (P < 0.001), in order the detection outcomes of the CRISPR-based fluorescence assay (Fig. 6, Supplementary Figure S4 and Table 2). The Ct worth of HIV-1 RNA from scientific samples reached 37.32 (112 copies/mL) detected by the CRISPR-based lateral-flow strip assay (Fig. 6, Supplementary S5). For samples with Ct worth much less the 37.32 (viral load extra the 112 copies/mL), the optimistic fee was 100% (100/100) and unfavorable fee was 100% (100/100), and for samples with Ct worth increased than 37.32 (viral load extra the 112 copies/mL), the optimistic fee was 10% (1/10) and unfavorable fee was 100% (48/48) (Fig. 6 and Supplementary S5). Briefly, the outcomes confirmed that the LOD for HIV-1 RNA by the CRISPR-based lateral-flow strip assay was 112 copies/mL, which was extremely in keeping with the scientific analysis.
In order to judge the impact of the CRISPR-based lateral-flow strip assay for detecting completely different HIV-1 subtypes, 60 scientific samples masking three main HIV-1 subtypes in China: subtype 01_AE, 07_BC and subtype B had been collected (20 samples of every subtype) and particular crRNAs had been designed for every subtype (Supplementary Table S3). The HIV-1 RNA was detected by CRISPR-based lateral-flow strip assay and in contrast with RT-qPCR and CRISPR-based fluorescence assay, the outcomes confirmed all of the 60 HIV-1 optimistic samples had been examined optimistic by CRISPR-based lateral-flow strip assay, in addition to by the CRISPR-based fluorescence assay and RT-qPCR (Table 3, Supplementary Figure S5).
[adinserter block=”4″]
[ad_2]
Source link