One signal of an impending presidential marketing campaign is the looks of a memoir marketed as a tell-all that, the truth is, tells little. On February twenty eighth Ron DeSantis, the Republican governor of Florida, who many donors assume is the social gathering’s best chance to thwart Donald Trump’s re-run for the White House, gave his entry to that literary custom when he printed his ebook, “The Courage to Be Free”. Mr DeSantis owes his standing amongst Republican major voters, who’re torn (early opinion polls counsel) between him and the previous president, to his bare-knuckled prosecution of home tradition wars across the instructing of important race concept, covid-19 lockdowns and censorship of conservatives on social media. But whereas an bold governor might concern himself solely with a battle on wokeness, a president should handle battle.

Already, international diplomats in Washington have been scouring Mr DeSantis’s scant public feedback and previous political document to guess how he would remake America’s international affairs and commerce relations. Some are cosying as much as the Israelis, with whom Mr DeSantis has been shut since his days as a congressman, within the hope that they’ve the inside track. The ebook might need helped fill in some gaps, they thought. Unfortunately for them, the queries should proceed for some time longer. The ebook just isn’t a deep meditation on worldwide affairs however a positioning doc for the bruising major election to return—providing just some clues and few particulars on how a President DeSantis would possibly handle coverage on China, Ukraine and commerce.

Despite the ebook’s title, Mr DeSantis doesn’t but have the braveness to criticise Mr Trump, whom he praises lavishly all through. Whereas the governor takes the time to disparage the “messianic impulse” of the neoconservatives who dominated through the presidency of George W. Bush, the nationalism and protectionism of the Trump period earn heat reward. Mr DeSantis writes that, together with rightly constructing the wall on the Mexican border, Mr Trump “also rightly ripped American failures at home, notably the outsourcing of manufacturing from our heartland to mainland China; and abroad, the endless wars in Iraq and Afghanistan”.

Questionable moments just like the Trump administration’s withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal, or from the Paris local weather accords, or the Doha Agreement in 2020—which set into movement the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan in 2021—will not be mentioned a lot and positively not criticised. He takes some credit score for Mr Trump’s choice to relocate the embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, saying that the warnings concerning the cataclysmic penalties of doing this confirmed “the bankruptcy of our bureaucratic ‘expert’ class”. (The rottenness of the deep state and the “national legacy press [that] is the praetorian guard of the nation’s failed ruling class” are recurring themes.)

Foreign coverage is of so little concern to American voters within the summary that presidential candidates have a tendency to explain their stances in home phrases. Mr Trump wished to return to an period when America was first, which meant slapping tariffs on allies and rivals alike and threatening to depart NATO. President Joe Biden—who mentioned that “there’s no longer a bright line between foreign and domestic policy”—has alternated between describing his concepts as a pedestrian “foreign policy for the middle class” or as a grand, existential contest between democracies and authoritarians. That framing, which annoys China’s president, Xi Jinping, is supposed to evoke the shameful assault on the Capitol by Trump supporters on January sixth 2021. This is true of Mr DeSantis, too, who views America’s international and home blunders as the results of the identical phenomenon: a reliance on a decadent, globalist elite who “embrace policies that ignore the importance of national sovereignty, favouring open borders and a ‘global economy’”.

As a congressman, Mr DeSantis was a famous Russia hawk, who urged the Obama administration to supply deadly assist to the Ukrainians after the unlawful annexation of Crimea in 2014. As he contemplates a presidential run, Mr DeSantis is a critic of Mr Biden’s “blank-cheque” coverage on Ukraine which doesn’t have a “strategic objective”. This just isn’t fairly the identical disengagement as that of Mr Trump, who now appears to need to reduce assist, however is out of line with the views of different mooted Republican contenders—like Mike Pence and Mike Pompeo—who’re extra staunchly supportive of Ukraine.

While in Congress, Mr DeSantis voted to expedite the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a commerce initiative launched by Barack Obama, which floundered. Now, in keeping with his social gathering, Mr DeSantis is quiet about commerce offers. Like virtually all Republicans and most Democrats, he’s hawkish on China and in 2021 signed laws aimed toward cracking-down on theft of company secrets and techniques and mental property in Florida.

Mr DeSantis is a shrewder politician than his pugilistic repute might counsel. He has managed to enchantment to all of the factions of his social gathering—the MAGA diehards, the cosmopolitan donor class and the non secular proper—by hewing to a strict coverage of strategic ambiguity. Abortion is talked about solely in passing in his new ebook, as an example; January sixth, in no way.

Although Mr Trump has been itching for a struggle, trying to find provocations in Mr DeSantis’s public statements, the governor has refused to punch again. The different anticipated contenders for the nomination are additionally refraining from attacking Mr Trump, who stays standard with the bottom. Nikki Haley, a former governor and member of the Trump cupboard who has declared her candidacy, just lately dodged a query on how she differed from her former boss. The Foreign Affairs essays on how the Florida governor’s worldview differs from Trumpism can wait till after the nomination contest, it appears. Until then the placeholder DeSantis doctrine will probably be to say little and alter the topic.

© 2023, The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved. From The Economist, printed underneath licence. The authentic content material might be discovered on www.economist.com