Does the New Delhi authorities comply with the insurance policies advocated in “Arthashastra,” an historical Indian treatise, in its overseas coverage? This is a debate that has been occurring for fairly some time. My reply to that is “no.”

I summarized my views on the topic in a 2020 article for The Diplomat. I additionally just lately spoke about this to the Vaad podcast (in Hindi). In a nutshell, my declare is that whereas the creator of “Arthashastra” was certainly extraordinarily pragmatic in his understanding of governance, this certainly not proves that New Delhi’s present overseas coverage pragmatism has been influenced by that historical Sanskrit treatise. (For reservations just like mine, see the conversation with Partha Chatterjee on web page 7-8 within the linked paper.) 

Yet, no matter my views on the subject, there’s a rising physique of literature that states the other. It could be truthful of me, due to this fact, to confer with a few of these new texts and briefly summarize in what methods they have an effect on my understanding of the topic.

Some of the authors which have been writing in regards to the modern relevance of “Arthashastra” are Medha Bisht, Pradeep Kumar Gautam, Kajari Kamal, Michael Liebig, Subrata Mitra, and Deepshikha Shahi. At least three of those authors have just lately argued that the philosophical tenets of “Arthashastra” stay related right now: for instance, this 2019 article by Pradeep Kumar Gautam, this 2021 commentary by Kamal, and this 2022 text by Medha Bisht. Two years in the past, Bisht revealed a ebook titled “Kautilya’s Arthashastra. Philosophy of Strategy,” however it’s a publication I’m admittedly not in possession of. A 2021 brief for ORF by Kajari Kamal and Gokul Sahni searches for traces of inspiration from “Arthashastra” in India’s coverage towards China and Pakistan, whereas a 2022 brief by the identical authors makes an attempt to do the identical for New Delhi’s Indo-Pacific technique. Kajari Kamal has additionally just lately revealed an entire ebook on the subject, “Kautilya’s Arthashastra: Strategic Cultural Roots of India’s Contemporary Statecraft.” Last yr additionally noticed the publication of one other ebook, “Kautilyanomics for Modern Times,” by Sriram Balasubramanian, this time in regards to the relevance of “Arthashastra” for financial thought, however this isn’t a subject I focus on. 

Yet, after studying part of these texts I nonetheless stay skeptical about making use of the options from an historical treatise to a up to date nation’s overseas coverage. First, I assume that decisionmakers principally act based mostly on widespread sense and pursuits (nationwide or their very own), relatively than theories and philosophies. Their pragmatism could also be self-taught and instinct-driven. While the identical sort of pragmatism could be seen within the pages of “Arthashastra,” this proves that the creator of the treatise was a shrewd observer of actuality – however not essentially that he influenced the policymakers of right now. 

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

Second, I discover almost each case of such a seek for relevance a reverse journey. Such texts look like extra descriptions of India’s overseas coverage, or its points, that are then being in comparison with options advocated in “Arthashastra” to level out a similarity. This manner, the dissimilarities are often omitted – and the dissimilarities abound, provided that “Arthashastra” described the truth of two millennia in the past. In my earlier commentary about this, I identified that the actor of the treatise suggested kings to, as an example, to handle elephant forests as elephants have been a very powerful software of warfare. Now, when a similarity is discovered, is it there as a result of a bunch of politicians learn the “Arthashastra” or as a result of that is merely how states act in worldwide relations?

Take this 2022 commentary by Kajari Kamal and Gokul Sahni about India’s Indo-Pacific technique:

[A]s all states search to outmanoeuvre (atisamdhana) their enemies and allies, power and reliability are necessary parameters in deciding companions. The Kautilyan dictum [note: Kautilya is believed to be the author of “Arthashastra”] that claims pacts and partnerships between a stronger and weaker energy inevitably contain the latter ceding management to the previous, serves as a warning in selecting allies. It can also be a reminder of the traditional roots of up to date India’s emphasis on strategic autonomy.

According to this argument, India’s makes an attempt at reaching strategic autonomy – a state of not being strategically depending on some other energy – would have their ultimate roots in treatises just like the “Arthashastra.” In different phrases, such readings might assist perceive why India doesn’t select to ally with the United States, because the latter stays a stronger energy. 

However, is that this not a dilemma confronted by almost each nation – together with these the place “Arthashastra” stays just about unknown? Are not the governments of weaker nations often conscious (to numerous levels) that alliances include situations, and {that a} stronger ally could dominate the weaker one? Don’t nations often resolve about forging an alliance relying on their studying (appropriate or not) of the threats they face? One authorities could assume that it might face a menace alone (as India does with China and Pakistan) and that allying with a stronger nation (the U.S.) is perhaps not vitally obligatory. Another authorities could assume that because it can not face its threats alone, that it’s nonetheless higher to ally with an incredible energy, regardless of the necessities that include it. And so certainly worldwide relations are a relentless recreation of outmaneuvering – all over the place, not simply close to Indian overseas coverage.

As for these factors of a few of the newer publications on “Arthashastra” that I discovered convincing and helpful for myself, I might to date listing not less than two:

First: The incontrovertible fact that sure main Indian policymakers certainly knew the contents of “Arthashastra” and typically praised it. Kamal’s current ebook factors out, as an example, that India’s first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, spoke extremely of “Arthashastra” as “a pioneering text of intelligence studies.” This, by the best way, is ironic not less than on two counts: Nehru is often seen as extra idealistic and normative in his method to overseas coverage (particularly in comparison with the realist creator of “Arthashastra”), and intelligence gathering on China’s actions turned out to be one of many greatest shortcomings of Nehru’s rule. Irony apart, this nonetheless signifies that the contents of “Arthashastra” are recognized to Indian leaders (or not less than a few of them).

Second: Proving that the complexity of worldwide relations could be described via phrases borrowed from “Arthashastra” (not simply via Western languages, as it’s often carried out). Kajari Kamal and Gokul Sahni’s 2021 commentary, which I preferred greater than the above-quoted 2022 one, is an efficient instance of this. Both India’s relations with China, in addition to these with Pakistan, have been aptly coated right here utilizing the Sanskrit phrases taken from “Arthashastra.” This just isn’t a imply feat, as we often appear to be below an impression that the realm of worldwide relations can’t be described with out the utilization of phrases from Western languages (akin to realpolitik, raison d’état, or exterior balancing) which in flip leads many to assume that the Western world is someway higher at understanding political processes.

Thus, “Arthashastra” reveals how governance could be described via non-Western notions, that non-Western commentators of the previous have been as expert in analyzing politics as their Western counterparts, and that sure guidelines of politics, together with overseas coverage, are everlasting and common. This is already so much. However, I nonetheless fail to spot proof that the traditional treatise serves as a playbook for conducting India’s overseas coverage right now.