These diamonds most likely formed by rapid shock transformation from graphite during one or more major impacts into the ureilite parent asteroid in the early solar system.

Previously, researchers have proposed that diamonds in ureilites formed like those on Earth — deep in the mantle of the planet, where the high pressures needed to form a diamond, are created by the weight of the overlying rock.

If diamonds in ureilites formed this way, then the original parent body on which they formed must have been a large protoplanet — at least the size of Mars or Mercury.

However, new research conducted by Prof. Fabrizio Nestola (University of Padova, Italy), Dr. Cyrena Goodrich (Universities Space Research Association at the Lunar and Planetary Institute), and their colleagues show there is no evidence requiring formation under the high static pressures and long growth time conditions of a planet’s deep interior.

The team investigated diamonds in three ureilite samples using electron microscopy, micro X-ray diffraction, and Raman laser spectroscopy. Their investigations revealed both large and small grains of diamond, along with metallic iron and graphite, in the carbon-rich regions located among the silicate mineral grains in these samples.

“We discovered the largest single-crystal diamond ever observed in a ureilite. Importantly, the ureilites that we investigated have all been highly shocked, based on the evidence from their silicate minerals, which strongly suggests that both large and small diamonds in these rocks formed from original graphite via shock processes,” said Dr Cyrena Goodrich.

The origin of diamonds in ureilites has important implications for models of planetary formation in the early solar system. Present day asteroids, from which most meteorites originate, are very small compared to the planets. However, planetary formation models predict that planets formed as a result of the accumulation of Moon- to Mars-sized planetary embryos (protoplanets).

Advocates of the high static pressure hypothesis for the origin of ureilite diamonds argue that the ureilite parent body was one of these embryos. However, Nestola and co-authors demonstrate that the presence of diamonds in ureilites does not require a Mars-sized parent body.

Previously it was thought that micrometer-sized diamonds were too large to have formed in the short time periods during which peak pressures are maintained in impact events. However, Nestola et al. calculated that peak shock pressures could last for 4-5 seconds during a major impact such as that inferred for the ureilite parent body.

This is sufficient for the formation of 100 micrometer-sized diamonds when catalyzed by the presence of metal, a process commonly used in the production of diamonds in the industry. Since metal is ubiquitously associated with the carbon phases in ureilites, catalyzed formation of large diamonds from original graphite under shock compression is very likely.

“Our findings are important because they not only indicate a shock origin for the diamonds in ureilites, as discussed by many previous researchers, they also refute arguments that have been made for the large parent body hypothesis,” Dr. Goodrich said.

“This type of scientific debate and testing of hypotheses is an essential part of making progress in science,” added Dr. Goodrich.