It’s a tough fact, however AMD’s Radeon graphics playing cards have by no means been significantly superb in content material creation or reside streaming workflows. CUDA runs the world for video modifying, and the AMF/VCE video encoder on AMD playing cards historically doesn’t hold up to the competition. But RDNA 3 and the Radeon RX 7900 series would possibly change all that.

I solely had restricted (distant) entry to one among AMD’s next-gen GPUs for testing, however I couldn’t resist testing the encoder capabilities on this new era and seeing how the updates fare. Spoiler alert: There’s loads to love now.

Welcome to the AV1 period

Resulting from AMD’s acquisition of Xilinix, RDNA 3 GPUs now have Xilinix {hardware} onboard for the “New dual media engine.” AMD’s press conference didn’t present a lot data to go together with on this. The wording implies the “dual” nature is simply the “simultaneous encode and decode” capability, which just about each fashionable GPU can do—it’s simply worded to sound like it’s a comparable enchancment to the twin AV1 encoders in Nvidia’s content creator-friendly RTX 40-series graphics cards.

AMD

The {hardware} change brings us AV1 encoding functionality on AMD’s new Radeon playing cards, too! Currently solely supported within the OBS 29 beta, the up to date encoder implementation nonetheless wants a piece, however it’s very promising.

Adam Taylor/IDG

Quality-wise, it’s actually onerous to see any main variations between low-bitrate AV1 encoded on AMD, Nvidia, or Intel {hardware}—which is nice information! For recording and archival utilization, AMD’s new AV1 encoder undoubtedly retains up with the competitors and brings that (anticipated however unsure) characteristic parity to next-gen AMD customers.

Adam Taylor/IDG

When pixel-peeping to essentially see who’s AV1 encoder performs finest for the upcoming AV1 streaming future at low bitrates (3.5mbps and 6mbps examined right here), AMD’s AV1 high quality appears to fall squarely between Intel and Nvidia, the place it steadily appears noticeably extra blocky or blurry than Nvidia’s encoding, however doesn’t get as blurry as Intel typically does.

Adam Taylor/IDG

Streaming immediately?

In extra excellent news: H264 and HEVC encoding on RDNA 3 GPUs additionally runs on a brand new {hardware} setup, with noticeable high quality enhancements over final era AMD encoding.

Adam Taylor/IDG

The dangerous information? Quality nonetheless lags considerably behind Nvidia and Intel.

Adam Taylor/IDG

Intel and Nvidia nonetheless commerce blows for who has the highest quality in these situations, however AMD nonetheless can’t sustain.

Adam Taylor/IDG

This issues much less at greater bitrates, however high quality will damage at decrease bitrates. Though it’s value noting that the standard bounce between RDNA 2 and RDNA 3 is most vital at decrease bitrates!

Adam Taylor/IDG

Obviously the extra fast-paced the sport or content material you’re making an attempt to stream is, the extra this high quality distinction issues. For slower video games, the standard distinction is much less vital.

Adam Taylor/IDG

It’s good to see that there’s some high quality enchancment right here , particularly since Nvidia is completed updating H264 high quality and I might be stunned if future Intel generations noticed enchancment on the legacy codec, both—however I used to be, admittedly, hoping for extra.

Adam Taylor/IDG

It’s unclear if this high quality bump is because of higher {hardware} benefiting from extra intense software program config right here (reminiscent of AMD’s claimed “AI” or machine studying technique of enhancing video high quality), or if these encoders are working on new {hardware}. I’m inclined to consider H264 and HEVC are nonetheless encoding on older AMD {hardware}, as in Task Manager the older codecs are proven to be encoding on totally different {hardware} than AV1.

Adam Taylor/IDG

For recording, archival, and an AV1-streaming future, AMD’s new graphics playing cards will do what creators need. AMD fails to be aggressive for a H264-streaming right here and now, nonetheless, which is disappointing to nonetheless see.

AMD’s encoding tremendous energy

In the reviewer’s information, AMD states that the H264 encoder can encode 4K video as much as 180FPS in H264 and H265, as much as 240FPS in AV1, and 8K at 48FPS in HEVC and 60FPS in AV1. While not as spectacular as I found RTX 4000’s encoding capabilities are, this may nonetheless be nice—however it’s extra sophisticated than that.

The superior information is that this era appears to have no driver lock on encode classes. That means you’ll be able to encode as many concurrent streams or movies as you need till the {hardware} begins to lag. I queued as much as 6 encodes directly earlier than the Ryzen 9 7950X CPU within the machine obtained too slowed down decoding the supply footage again and again. That’s nice. Nvidia at the moment has a driver limitation of three encode classes at a time, regardless of the {hardware} being able to way more.

Encoding greater than two classes at a time is hard, nonetheless, as the brand new “High Quality” preset for AV1 pegs the video encoder {hardware} at one hundred pc utilization with only one 4K 60FPS encode, and I discovered it extremely straightforward to journey into encoder lag territory with each OBS Studio and AMD ReLive. This means you’ll find yourself with a stuttery or slideshow-like video for those who’re not cautious. Above 1440p, I discovered it most dependable to make use of the “Speed” preset (not obtainable in ReLive) which suggests you’ll want to make use of greater bitrates to keep up the identical degree of high quality.

On the brilliant facet, this card could be an exquisite selection for Plex server customers wanting a variety of simultaneous encodes—as soon as Plex provides assist for this {hardware}, not less than.

AMD ReLive lives once more

Adam Taylor/IDG

AMD ships their very own recording and streaming software program with their GPUs, akin to Nvidia Shadowplay. Except, it’s far far higher than Shadowplay in nearly each approach. More settings, extra capabilities, extra options. Nvidia actually must replace Shadowplay ASAP.

Video modifying?

I’ll have to research full creator workflow testing sooner or later as soon as I really get hands-on with AMD’s new playing cards, however I did run a fast DaVinci Resolve benchmark utilizing Puget System’s PugetBench, working on the Radeon RX 7900 XT somewhat than the flagship XTX. It is essential to notice that my take a look at bench for this run used an AMD Ryzen 7950X CPU as an alternative of my typical 12900k take a look at bench (since I solely had distant entry) however the outcomes are promising.

Adam Taylor/IDG

The Radeon 7900 XT appears to beat out last-gen’s RTX 3080 and 3090, which is spectacular. It nonetheless has an extended strategy to go to match the brand new RTX 4080 and 4090—however hopefully the beefier Radeon RX 7900 XTX could make up that distinction. The 24GB reminiscence capability on the cardboard is definitely welcome for video modifying.

Adam Taylor/IDG

Is AMD again?

Based on their communication selections, I nonetheless can’t assist however really feel that media and streaming is an afterthought for AMD’s restricted sources (in comparison with Nvidia) however they’re lastly beginning to claw again efficiency in these classes. For individuals doing AI upscaling, video modifying, or AV1 encoding, I lastly really feel assured recommending AMD playing cards to creators, particularly given how low cost they’re in comparison with Nvidia’s costly GeForce choices this era.