She loves Indian meals and in movies shared by her dad and mom seems joyful of their firm.

But Baby M, two-and-a-half-years-old, is now in a centre for kids with particular wants close to the German metropolis of Berlin, her mom says.

The toddler has been on the centre of a diplomatic row between India and Germany after she was taken away from her Indian household on accusations of kid abuse in September 2021 – when she was solely seven months outdated.

In June this yr, a courtroom in Berlin terminated the parental rights of Dia and her husband Amit – we’re not utilizing their actual names for authorized causes – and the child’s custody was handed over to Jugendamt or the Youth Welfare Office of Germany. The courtroom additionally rejected the dad and mom’ demand to repatriate the kid to India. The dad and mom have known as it a “sham trial” and filed an enchantment.

Dia, who’s presently in Delhi to drum up help in her battle to convey the kid again to India, dissolves into tears whereas speaking to the BBC about being separated from her daughter.

The household moved to Berlin in 2018 when Amit bought a job there and Baby M was born on 2 February 2021.

According to courtroom paperwork, on the centre of the household’s row with the authorities is a genital damage Baby M suffered when she was seven months outdated. It has one physician saying that they’d “never seen such a severe genital injury in an infant” and that she wanted surgical procedure to repair it.

The baby safety companies took her away saying they suspected sexual abuse – an accusation the household denied. The hospital the place she was handled cleared them later, with docs certifying that “there was no evidence” to recommend sexual abuse and the police closed the case with out urgent expenses.

The dad and mom say they imagine the damage was unintentional. Two impartial docs from the US and India who noticed the child’s medical information agreed with that evaluation.

“The injury highly likely was caused by an accident. It was impossible that parents intentionally inflicted injuries on her repeatedly and then rushed her to the doctors,” they stated in a report submitted in courtroom. They added that they believed that “her injuries could’ve been worsened because of all the invasive examinations” she was put by means of.

But the kid safety authorities stated they did not suppose that Baby M could be protected at residence – a competition the courtroom agreed with.

So, she has now spent practically two years in foster care, and her dad and mom say they’ve been allowed little contact together with her – regardless of social employees who had been assigned to the household describing them as “loving and caring” dad and mom and describing the kid’s interactions with them as “consistently positive, joyful and curious”. A court-appointed psychologist additionally beneficial that one of many dad and mom dwell with Baby M in a parent-child facility supervised by a caregiver.

But final week, Jugendamt knowledgeable the dad and mom that “all visitations with their daughter have been cancelled as there is no one to pick and drop her”, says Dia, alleging that they haven’t even been allowed to video-call the kid.

“We have no information on who is caring for her since she was moved from foster care to the centre for children with special needs. The secrecy surrounding our baby is totally bizarre.”

Dia accuses the German authorities of “snatching my child because of cultural differences and miscommunication” – she says she will be able to’t communicate German and the translator she was given spoke Hindi however didn’t know Gujarati. The BBC has reached out to Jugendamt and their response is awaited.

Baby M’s case has obtained numerous consideration in India and Germany – protests have been held in a number of Indian cities and by the Indian diaspora in Frankfurt and Darmstadt and help has poured in for the dad and mom.

In Delhi, Dia has met officers from the Indian ministry of exterior affairs (MEA) and lobbied dozens of MPs who’ve despatched a letter to the German Ambassador Phillip Ackerman to repatriate the toddler to India.

An MP urged the government to take the required steps to convey her again. Another politician requested Prime Minister Narendra Modi to take up the matter with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz when he visits Delhi subsequent month for the G-20 summit.

Dia too is now interesting to the prime minister to intervene. “My only hope is Mr Modi now. If he intervenes, my daughter can come back,” she says.

The dispute over Baby M has revived reminiscences of a similar case from 2011 when two Indian youngsters had been taken from their dad and mom in Norway. They had been ultimately returned to India a yr later.

Suranya Aiyar, former lawyer and activist who helped the Indian household in Norway and is now serving to Baby M’s dad and mom, says such instances aren’t unusual.

“It’s a significant problem. The assumption is that it’s a brilliant solution, and needs no further discussion.”

The position of Jugendamt in cross-border household disputes has additionally been criticised by the European Parliament. In a scathing report in 2018, the EP accused the organisation of discrimination, being unfair to youngsters of migrants, and harming the rights of each dad and mom and the youngsters they confiscate.

In a new report released in May, the EP stated its Committee on Petitions nonetheless receives complaints about Jugendamt. “The role and actions of youth welfare offices are often seen as too far-reaching… Foreign parents feel disadvantaged compared to German parents.”

A greater answer in instances like these, Ms Aiyar says, could be for the state to assign social employees to assist households take care of their youngsters.

In Baby M’s case, she says, the one answer is for the federal government to step in.

“The child has done no wrong. Let her return to India. She’s an Indian citizen and she has every right to be here.”

The Indian authorities has stated the case is being given “high priority”. MEA spokesperson Arindam Bagchi stated earlier this month that that they had “summoned the German Ambassador” to convey India’s considerations.

“At a minimum we believe this child’s cultural rights and rights as an Indian are being infringed upon,” Mr Bagchi stated at a media briefing. “We have asked for the early return of the child to India and we will continue to press Germany on this matter,” he added.

A German embassy spokesman in Delhi refused to touch upon the case. But authorities sources in Germany stated the case was in courtroom and out of their arms, including that they had been working with India to discover a decision to the case.

Indian authorities say they’ve recognized a household in Gujarat – the western Indian state to which the household belongs – the place Baby M might be positioned in foster care.

Dr Kiran Aggarwal, retired authorities paediatrician and former member of the kid welfare committee of the Delhi authorities, says the kid ought to be together with her dad and mom.

“India has very robust child protection laws and if the German court repatriates her, she can be looked after in India,” she stated.

As time passes, Dia says every day provides to her fear that she’s shedding her baby little by little.

“She’s not being able to learn her mother tongue Gujarati. She only speaks German, how will I be able to speak to her?” she asks.

The household can also be struggling to pay the 9m rupees ($108,477; £85,554) they’ve been ordered to fork out for foster care and courtroom prices.

“We raised money through crowdfunding and have already paid 5m rupees. We are a middle-class family. They have broken us morally and emotionally, now they are trying to break us financially too,” she says.

BBC News India is now on YouTube. Click here to subscribe and watch our documentaries, explainers and options.