This week, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy issued a long-overdue message warning Americans what they already know: Social media is harming youngsters. But wanting by way of the 19-page advisory, the surgeon normal’s options seem probably extra harmful than these pariah platforms themselves. He is pushing for a critically misguided coverage that many state legislatures and regulators have already enacted, a mistake that threatens to undo what little web privateness we’ve left. To defend youngsters from social media, he argues, platforms and lawmakers should implement age minimums. This is tantamount to requiring ID to go surfing.

Thirty years in the past this July, an iconic New Yorker cartoon quipped that “On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog.” It was a wry commentary on the then novel anonymity that appeared to outline digital areas. Online, you might create a assemble, somebody who navigated the web as you wished to be seen, not as you really had been. Of course, trendy social media typically offers a fraction of the invisibility that customers as soon as discovered on early text-based bulletin board providers, however there are numerous on-line communities the place anonymity not solely persists however is indispensable.

Anonymity is what has allowed so many people, together with teenagers, to construct connections and discover neighborhood, particularly when dwelling in locations the place in-person assist is tough to seek out. It’s a lifeline for LQBTQ youngsters dealing with homophobia, who concern homelessness or violence if their dad and mom study who they’re. It can create a protected method for undocumented people and people previously incarcerated to have a social life whilst they concern retribution from regulation enforcement. And digital platforms are more and more the one methods for pregnant folks in antiabortion states to determine get the care they want, whether or not by way of the mail or by touring throughout state traces. For increasingly Americans, safe, nameless web platforms are the one solution to disguise from those that would persecute and even arrest them merely for being who they’re.

Of course, the surgeon normal and state lawmakers aren’t deliberately making an attempt to sabotage these features of on-line life, however that is the inevitable consequence of how they’re approaching the specter of social media. The surgeon normal’s advisory calls on platforms to strengthen and implement age minimums, and on policymakers to develop specialised necessities for teenagers on social media, together with the whole lot from limits on dangerous content material to stronger age-enforcement applied sciences. But the surgeon normal by no means says what magical know-how might presumably show a person’s age with out destroying all of our privateness. 

Looking on the states that already require proof of age to entry a given web site or make a web-based account, the scenario is grim. One of the simplest methods to confirm age is to require customers to submit a government ID with a purpose to entry a specific service. This must be regarding to everybody who claims that they wish to defend youthful customers. Requiring authorities ID to entry The New York Times or to create a Wikipedia account, for instance, will forestall thousands and thousands of Americans with out IDs from reaping the advantages of those websites. And even worse, those that do have IDs can have their authorized names linked to the whole lot they do on-line. And this isn’t only for teenagers. The solely solution to establish teen customers is to card each person of any age each time they log in. This paper path will make it simpler than ever earlier than for police and different regulation enforcement businesses to go looking our on-line histories.

Alternatively, some states could permit websites to have customers enter their credit card information to confirm their age. But that can be simple to avoid (as each child who has used a mum or dad’s card is aware of). Worse, it’s going to exclude unbanked adults from on-line providers. In an excellent creepier improvement, some platforms have proposed using AI to guess a person’s age primarily based on a photograph of their face or an evaluation of their looking historical past. But these error-prone methods are prone to get web sites sued once they inevitably guess customers’ ages improper.

It’s easy: The surgeon normal and lawmakers can focus their work on defending the privateness and psychological well being of all customers, together with youngsters, or they’ll proceed to push misguided legal guidelines that put youngsters in danger. But irrespective of which path they choose, the reality is that magic know-how to substantiate everybody’s age will stay a fantasy, and the worth of curbing digital anonymity is an all-too-potent risk.

WIRED Opinion publishes articles by outdoors contributors representing a variety of viewpoints. Read extra opinions here. Submit an op-ed at ideas@wired.com.