The new president of European soccer’s governing physique settled right into a chair in his glass-walled workplace in Switzerland, glanced out on the sweeping views of Lake Geneva and insisted he wouldn’t be there lengthy sufficient to get snug.

It was 2017, soccer was nonetheless rising from its greatest scandal and Aleksander Ceferin, only some months into his presidency, was unequivocal that he was already on the clock. The sport, he mentioned, might now not settle for leaders who grew so snug with the trimmings of energy and luxurious that they labored the system to stay of their jobs. He wouldn’t be like them, he promised.

The three-year time period to which he had been elected, ending out the one vacated by his disgraced predecessor, “is already one term for me,” he mentioned. If he was lucky sufficient to earn the 2 extra full four-year phrases allowed by the foundations, advantageous. But that may be it. Mr. Ceferin had little interest in being a president for all times.

“They said: ‘Why have term limits? You can be here for 20 or 30 years,’” he mentioned on the time. “I do not want to stay for 20 years.”

Less than a decade later, Mr. Ceferin might have had a change of coronary heart. At his urging, the soccer physique that he runs, UEFA, will vote subsequent week on a set of rule modifications that features a measure that may permit Mr. Ceferin to remain within the presidency of one of many world’s richest sports activities organizations for years past the top date he as soon as promised.

He shouldn’t be the one chief ushered in by another person’s scandal now searching for to strengthen his maintain on a robust job. An analogous term-limits extension was already quietly permitted by soccer’s world governing physique, FIFA, guaranteeing that its president, Gianni Infantino, is eligible for an extra four-year term in a job that paid him about $4.5 million in money and bonuses in 2022.

At the International Olympic Committee, supporters of the term-limited president Thomas Bach recently proposed that the group’s constitution be amended in order that he can keep on one other 4 years. Mr. Bach, who didn’t dismiss the concept, is aware of these guidelines in addition to anybody: Like Mr. Infantino, he’s a lawyer who helped draw up his group’s post-scandal reforms — together with the introduction of time period limits — earlier than he was elevated to the highest job.

Sports governance specialists, although, are frightened by the development, for the reason that present leaders have been tasked with guiding their organizations out of a scandal-plagued previous. They say that reforms like time period limits, born out of these scandals, are price defending to forestall a focus of energy into the palms of a small coterie of executives operating fashionable and profitable sports activities loved by thousands and thousands around the globe.

Weakening or eliminating them, the specialists warned, is a transfer straight out of the playbook of world leaders and autocrats so {powerful} that they will select to stay in management for so long as they need. “It says quite simply that once people are in power, they don’t want to leave,” mentioned Alex Phillips, a former head of governance and compliance at UEFA.

Asked about Mr. Ceferin’s intentions of operating once more, UEFA provided no direct reply from the president, and instructed a evaluate of his current public feedback as an alternative. In subsequent interviews with two British outlets, which he used to settle scores with members of his administration and different rivals, Mr. Ceferin was noncommittal about whether or not he would search to remain in workplace, regardless of his earlier definitive guarantees.

But he mentioned that except UEFA’s present guidelines have been revised, “there would be no limit and I could run forever.”

The opposition to that risk is rising. Interviews with UEFA executives, board members and staff over the previous a number of months revealed that a number of the strongest figures inside the group have objected forcefully, arguing that even a perceived weakening of time period limits is unwise. One prime official has already resigned in protest. Another lately warned his colleagues, and Mr. Ceferin, that creating an omnipotent president went towards the spirit of the overhauls enacted to keep away from a repeat of previous scandals.

Yet when the term-limits change is voted on by UEFA’s 55 nationwide associations at its annual assembly in Paris on Thursday — tucked safely inside a broader package deal of extra anodyne modifications — even Mr. Ceferin’s harshest critics anticipate him to get what he desires.

This, they mentioned, is simply how issues work in a world the place even influential critics not often put factors of precept above tens of thousands and thousands of {dollars} in funding, plum committee assignments and beneficial internet hosting rights.

As a outcome, they are saying, chief executives have gotten as laborious to dislodge as their corrupt predecessors. There has not been a contested presidential election in FIFA, UEFA or any of soccer’s different regional governing our bodies — or within the I.O.C. — since their present leaders took workplace almost a decade in the past.

“The longer they stay, the more powerful they become,” Mr. Phillips mentioned, “so the more likely they can change the rules unopposed.”

Many of them, he added, now “genuinely believe that they are irreplaceable.”

Mr. Ceferin, 56, was in some ways an unintended UEFA president. His ascension solely got here after a corruption scandal that exposed years of bribery, vote-buying and secret offers in soccer. The case led to the ouster of a number of the sport’s longest-serving leaders, tearing down empires and creating room for contemporary faces. As the little-known chief of Slovenia’s soccer federation, Mr. Ceferin appeared a clear break from a problematic previous.

A black belt in karate who speaks 5 languages, Mr. Ceferin managed the group by means of the coronavirus pandemic and beat again a proposal for a European super league that posed an existential risk to UEFA’s greatest moneymaker, the Champions League, the annual membership competitors that rakes in billions of {dollars} from sponsorships and broadcast offers. Throughout that point he has, because of the workplace, rubbed shoulders with world leaders and a few of sports activities’ best-known athletes.

It is little surprise then, his critics say, that he would possibly welcome the choice of staying in his $3 million-a-year job for so long as the foundations permit.

Mr. Ceferin has insisted that the proposed change is little greater than a tweak of authorized language, one which retains the 12-year most for the group’s leaders however will now state that phrases “started or served before 1 July 2017 shall not be taken into account.” Mr. Ceferin was elected in September 2016, so the revision successfully wipes away the three years he as soon as labeled his first time period, and opens the door for him to remain till no less than 2031.

“The proposed change was not intended to extend the term limit, but is aimed to rectify an invalid provision,” UEFA mentioned in an announcement on the modification.

That slim clarification was challenged by considered one of UEFA’s most senior officers, David Gill of England, throughout a board assembly final fall in Germany. According to a number of individuals current, Mr. Gill requested for the ground after the top of UEFA’s authorized committee, a longtime ally of Mr. Ceferin, omitted the term-limit proposal from a presentation about an important modifications to the foundations.

As the longest-serving official on the board, Mr. Gill pointedly informed the board, he was the one one current with expertise of the dangerous outdated days at each FIFA and UEFA. Altering the statute on time period limits was not a minor change, as had been instructed, however reasonably “a major change” worthy of debate. Mr. Ceferin responded that the present guidelines have been “unclear,” and needled Mr. Gill that he had by no means spoken about time period limits in board conferences till after Mr. Ceferin grew to become president.

“It’s about the spirit of the rules,” Mr. Gill fired again. “You were elected before the statutes changed. You were president before the statutes changed. And the statutes were very clear at the time that a part term is a full term.”

The tensions exploded into public view in January, when considered one of Mr. Ceferin’s closest aides, the previous Croatia star Zvonimir Boban, resigned as UEFA’s director of soccer. Mr. Boban lamented that it had been Mr. Ceferin himself who had led the reforms he was now set to weaken. He walked in his boss’s workplace and stop, he mentioned, when it grew to become clear that Mr. Ceferin “intends to move forward regardless in pursuit of his personal aspirations.”

Like Mr. Ceferin, Mr. Infantino and Mr. Bach additionally get pleasure from a level of management over their organizations that insulates them from challenges, based on Stephen Weatherill, a sports activities governance skilled and former professor of European legislation on the University of Oxford.

National federations, Professor Weatherill identified, are reliant on relationships with worldwide governing our bodies — and their leaders — for annual price range help, growth support and entry to internet hosting rights for profitable occasions. A robust chief who cultivates these relationships, and that sense of dependence, can use the facility of incumbency to their benefit.

“Term limits ensure that sports leaders do not stay too long in their position,” Mr. Phillips mentioned. “History has shown again and again that, the longer they stay, the more they focus on staying in power, or pursuing personal interests, rather than developing their sport.”