The U.N. Security Council on Wednesday overwhelmingly rejected Russia’s try to ascertain a fee to research its unfounded claims that Ukraine and the United States are finishing up “military biological” actions that violate the conference prohibiting using organic weapons.

Russia solely acquired assist from China within the vote on its decision, with the U.S., Britain and France voting “no” and the 10 other council nations abstaining. The resolution was not approved because it failed to get the minimum nine “yes” votes required for adoption.

The 2-3-10 vote reflected the council’s continuing opposition and skepticism about Russia’s actions since its Feb. 24 invasion of Ukraine. The council has been paralyzed from taking any action against Russia’s military offensive because of Russia’s veto power.

Also read: Russia says immediate task is to avoid nuclear war, slams West for ‘provocations’

Russia circulated the draft resolution and a 310-page document to council members last week alleging that military biological activity is taking place at biological laboratories in Ukraine with support from the U.S. Defense Department.

Russia’s deputy ambassador Dmitry Polyansky said after the vote that his government was “extremely disappointed” that the council did not respond positively to its request to establish a commission comprising the Security Council’s 15 members to carry out an investigation of its complaint as allowed under Article VI of the biological weapons convention.

He claimed “Western countries demonstrated in every way that the law does not apply to them” and “are ready to trample any norm, to flout any rule,” accusing them of a “colonial mentality.”

U.S. Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield countered that the United States voted in opposition to the decision “as a result of it’s based mostly on disinformation, dishonesty, dangerous religion, and a complete lack of respect for this physique.”

Before the vote, Russia’s Polyansky referred to as the decision “a considerable milestone” that will present whether or not the Security Council was ready to behave according to worldwide regulation giving state events to the organic weapons conference the correct to hunt an investigation on the Security Council.

“It is a milestone for Russia’s deception and lies,” Thomas-Greenfield shot again. “And the world sees it.”

At a gathering in September of the 197 state events to the organic weapons conference, she stated, “Russia failed to provide any credible evidence to support these false allegations” and an amazing variety of nations that spoke “considered that the issues raised by Russia were unsubstantiated and had been conclusively addressed.”

But Thomas-Greenfield stated that wasn’t sufficient and “it inappropriately raised the same false claims here, abusing its position and abusing us.”

Russia’s preliminary allegation of secret American organic warfare labs in Ukraine in March has been disputed by impartial scientists, Ukrainian leaders and officers on the White House and Pentagon. An Associated Press investigation in March discovered the declare was taking root on-line, uniting COVID-19 conspiracy theorists, QAnon adherents and a few supporters of former President Donald Trump.

Ukraine does have a community of organic labs which have gotten funding and analysis assist from the U.S. They are owned and operated by Ukraine and are a part of an initiative referred to as the Biological Threat Reduction Program that goals to cut back the chance of lethal outbreaks, whether or not pure or artifical. The U.S. efforts date again to work within the Nineties to dismantle the previous Soviet Union’s program for weapons of mass destruction.

Russia referred to as a Security Council assembly on its claims final Thursday, which the United States and its Western allies vehemently dismissed.

Thomas-Greenfield, the U.S. ambassador, referred to as the assembly “a colossal waste of time” and stated the claims are a part of a Moscow “disinformation campaign” that’s making an attempt “to distract from the atrocities Russian forces are carrying out in Ukraine and a desperate tactic to justify an unjustifiable war.”

Also learn: US welcomes restoration of grain deal, urges Russia to renew it

“Ukraine does not have a biological weapons program,” she stated. “The United States does not have a biological weapons program. There are no Ukrainian biological weapons laboratories supported by the United States.”

Russia’s U.N. Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia accused the U.S. of conducting work in Ukraine with lethal pathogens — together with cholera, plague, anthrax and influenza — that couldn’t be justified below the guise of public well being. He stated paperwork and proof recovered by Russian authorities recommended a navy utility.

Nebenzia instructed the Security Council that the Russian navy throughout its time in Ukraine had recovered drones able to spraying bioagents in addition to paperwork that he stated associated to analysis on the potential for spreading pathogens via bats and migrating birds.

Thomas-Greenfield countered that Russia’s claims are “absurd for many reasons, including because such species, even if they could be weaponized, would pose as much a threat to the European continent and to Ukraine itself as they would to any other country.”