The authorities sought to maintain the cash frozen, arguing that it is going to be wanted to pay restitution that it’ll in the end search. But it hasn’t carried out so but, in keeping with the Chicago Business.

“While the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act allows the government to enforce an existing restitution order, it says nothing about a future one,” US District Judge Thomas Durkin wrote.

“The court declines to take that leap.”

During the trial, Shah, who owned about 80 per cent of the corporate’s belongings, sought to have $10 million of the frozen belongings returned to him, which he and Agarwal might use to rent legal professionals, however the request was denied.

According to the information report, Shah’s attorneys have questioned how the federal government traced his belongings and hinted on the worth of improperly frozen belongings, which can now be value extra.

“To the extent that Shah believes that the amount of untainted property presently restrained exceeds $4,856,482.41, the court will require further briefing and proceedings on that issue,” choose Durkin wrote in his ruling.