[ad_1]
NEW DELHI: In an unprecedented ugly spat between the top of the judiciary and president of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), CJI D Y Chandrachud on Thursday resolutely mentioned he had by no means allowed anybody to “browbeat” him and he would not be “cowed down by the Bar chief’s “threats” for urgent hearing of a case relating to a chamber for lawyers in the capital. “Do not threaten the CJI like this,” Chandrachud said.
The bench, also comprising Justice P S Narasimha, told SCBA president Vikas Singh, “We will cope with the petition when it’s listed earlier than us. There are many extra pressing issues. Tell us a single day when we’ve sat idle and never heard circumstances. Do not arm-twist me to get your petition listed.”
SCBA president Vikas Singh made a grievance that the petition relating to allotment of land for construction of chambers for lawyers, who have been waiting for decades, was mentioned several times for early listing, but was not being listed. “I wouldn’t have any clarification to offer to the attorneys. Their case shouldn’t be being heard,” Singh said.
The CJI said it will be listed for hearing on March 17. Singh repeated his grievance of lawyers’ case not getting a hearing from the court and said, “I’ll must escalate the problem… take dharnas to the judges’ residences.”
This got the CJI’s goat. He said, “Do not threaten the CJI like this. I can’t checklist the case in the event you undertake this tactic. I can’t be cowed down by your threats. Don’t elevate your voice in courtroom. As a senior advocate and president of SCBA, you’re the mentor for therefore many attorneys. Do not behave in a way which does not behove of a senior advocate or a bar chief.”
Singh said, “This shouldn’t be my manner of persuading the courtroom to listen to a case. I by no means elevate my voice. But this pertains to a vital want of attorneys, a chamber for which they’ve been ready for many years. When requests for early listening to are repeatedly not heeded to, what selection do I’ve as a bar chief? What do I inform advocates whose work is affected due to not having a chamber?”
When Singh continued in the same tone and tenor to seek listing of the matter as the first item on March 17, the CJI-led bench said, “It will probably be listed on March 17, however not as the primary merchandise.”
The CJI said, “Mr Vikas Singh, please perceive. I’ve been a choose of the constitutional courtroom for the reason that yr 2000. In the final 23 years, I’ve by no means allowed attorneys, litigants or anybody to browbeat me. I can’t permit that to occur within the final two years of my profession.”
Singh said that just because the bar is cooperating with the Supreme Court , it does not mean it will be taken for a ride. “What clarification do I give to attorneys?” he asked. The CJI then said, “Settle your agenda exterior the courtroom.”
The bench, also comprising Justice P S Narasimha, told SCBA president Vikas Singh, “We will cope with the petition when it’s listed earlier than us. There are many extra pressing issues. Tell us a single day when we’ve sat idle and never heard circumstances. Do not arm-twist me to get your petition listed.”
SCBA president Vikas Singh made a grievance that the petition relating to allotment of land for construction of chambers for lawyers, who have been waiting for decades, was mentioned several times for early listing, but was not being listed. “I wouldn’t have any clarification to offer to the attorneys. Their case shouldn’t be being heard,” Singh said.
The CJI said it will be listed for hearing on March 17. Singh repeated his grievance of lawyers’ case not getting a hearing from the court and said, “I’ll must escalate the problem… take dharnas to the judges’ residences.”
This got the CJI’s goat. He said, “Do not threaten the CJI like this. I can’t checklist the case in the event you undertake this tactic. I can’t be cowed down by your threats. Don’t elevate your voice in courtroom. As a senior advocate and president of SCBA, you’re the mentor for therefore many attorneys. Do not behave in a way which does not behove of a senior advocate or a bar chief.”
Singh said, “This shouldn’t be my manner of persuading the courtroom to listen to a case. I by no means elevate my voice. But this pertains to a vital want of attorneys, a chamber for which they’ve been ready for many years. When requests for early listening to are repeatedly not heeded to, what selection do I’ve as a bar chief? What do I inform advocates whose work is affected due to not having a chamber?”
When Singh continued in the same tone and tenor to seek listing of the matter as the first item on March 17, the CJI-led bench said, “It will probably be listed on March 17, however not as the primary merchandise.”
The CJI said, “Mr Vikas Singh, please perceive. I’ve been a choose of the constitutional courtroom for the reason that yr 2000. In the final 23 years, I’ve by no means allowed attorneys, litigants or anybody to browbeat me. I can’t permit that to occur within the final two years of my profession.”
Singh said that just because the bar is cooperating with the Supreme Court , it does not mean it will be taken for a ride. “What clarification do I give to attorneys?” he asked. The CJI then said, “Settle your agenda exterior the courtroom.”
[adinserter block=”4″]
[ad_2]
Source link