US NATO Ambassador Julianne Smith, whereas talking on NATO and strengthening relationships with South Asia and the Indo-Pacific, nearly mentioned the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation is able to have interaction extra with India whether it is . The Ambassador although pressured that presently there are not any plans by the alliance to increase this to a broader world navy alliance.

Also Read| NATO reacts to Putin’s nuclear threat: ‘Dangerous, irresponsible’

“The NATO alliance is open to more engagement should India seek that. NATO currently has 40 different partners around the World and each individual partnership is different. Various countries come to the door seeking different levels of political engagement, sometimes countries are much more interested in working on inter-operability, and standardization questions. So, they vary. But, the message that has already been sent back to India is that NATO alliance is certainly open to more engagement with India, should that country take interest in pursuing that”, mentioned Julianne Smith in a digital press briefing.

“Membership is not something that we have really considered with anyone in the Indo-Pacific or Asia-Pacific. The alliance remains the Euro-Atlantic military alliance. Its door is open to the region. But there are no plans by the alliance to expand this to a broader global military alliance,” she added.

Further, talking on the assembly of NATO Ministers of Foreign Affairs, which can happen on April 4-5, 2023 on the NATO Headquarters in Brussels, the ambassador mentioned “at this stage, we would not want to invite them (India) to NATO ministerial until we knew more about their interest in engaging the alliance more broadly”.

“Regarding the Ministerial next week, 4 countries that I mentioned (Australia, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea and Japan), are four countries that have already established formal partnerships with the alliance over many years. They worked closely with the NATO alliance on security challenges. These relationships have been ongoing. We have been working to strengthen these relationships. These are four countries that joined us at the summit last year in Madrid,” mentioned Smith.

“In terms of the future with India, I think NATO’s door is open in terms of engagement should India be interested. But we would not want to at this stage invite them to NATO ministerial until we knew more about their interest in engaging the alliance more broadly,” she added.

Appreciating India’s function within the Russia-Ukraine battle, the envoy mentioned she is grateful for the humanitarian help that India has been capable of present to the nation and that she appreciates India’s name for a direct finish to the battle in Ukraine.

“We both at NATO and United States, welcome what India has been able to do for the people of Ukraine. We are very grateful for the humanitarian assistance that India has been able to provide which is critical right now and those needs are only growing. Certainly, appreciate calls coming from India for some sort of immediate end to the war in Ukraine. That’s important. And we have been in constant communication with India about what more we can do together to hold Russia accountable and we have done that and worked with India, spoken with India several times since Russia started this war inside Ukraine,” mentioned Smith.

“The United States and India do not always share exactly the same policy approaches, but we do share a commitment to upholding the rules-based order and ensuring that the key principles particularly as they relate to sovereignty and territorial integrity, those principles are respected. I think that’s the most important part of our relationship,” she added.

Speaking concerning the NATO shift, the envoy highlighted how the alliance has began to say the Asia-Pacific and the Indo-Pacific in a few of its strategic paperwork.

“NATO has really shifted in a pretty noticeable way in terms of how it conducts outreach and engages with its partners in Indo- pacific. If you go back 5-6 or 7 years, you would find an alliance that didn’t necessarily have rich agenda with the countries in the Indo-Pacific. Still, in recent years, what NATO has started to do is to include, mention of the Asia-Pacific and the Indo-Pacific first and foremost in some of its strategic documents,” she mentioned.

“This is the first time that the alliance acknowledges the importance of focusing on the PRC as a challenge for the alliance and why it’s important for NATO allies to enhance and deepen its relationship across with partners in the region and NATO has just done that. We are bringing our friends from the Indo- Pacific in the NATO HQ into ministerial, what we call North Atlantic Council in summits so that we can learn from our partners in terms of what their experiences, challenges to the security,” she added.