[ad_1]
“We are not going to issue any injunction ever against the media,” Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, heading a three-judge bench, advised Advocate M L Sharma, who filed the plea contending that the media was sensationalising the difficulty.
THE SUPREME Court on Friday rejected a plea in search of to cease the media from reporting on the Adani-Hindenburg matter until the courtroom takes a call on the petitions pending earlier than it.
You have exhausted your
month-to-month restrict of free tales.
To proceed studying,
merely register or register
Continue studying with an Indian Express Premium membership beginning Rs 91 per 30 days.
This premium article is free for now.
Register to proceed studying this story.
This content material is unique for our subscribers.
Subscribe to get limitless entry to The Indian Express unique and premium tales.
This content material is unique for our subscribers.
Subscribe now to get limitless entry to The Indian Express unique and premium tales.
“We are not going to issue any injunction ever against the media,” Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, heading a three-judge bench, advised Advocate M L Sharma, who filed the plea contending that the media was sensationalising the difficulty.
The bench, additionally comprising Justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwala, advised Sharma to “make a reasonable argument… not for injunction against the media”.
The counsel reminded the courtroom that it was but to pronounce its choice on a batch of petitions on the matter. The bench stated it will pronounce its order quickly. Earlier this month, the courtroom had reserved its choice on the petitions which sought a probe into the Hindenburg Research report accusing the Adani Group of “brazen stock manipulation and accounting fraud”.
© The Indian Express (P) Ltd
[adinserter block=”4″]
[ad_2]
Source link