When 17-year-old Manoj – who was recorded feminine intercourse at delivery – instructed his household that he felt like a person and beloved a lady, he nearly bought killed.

He says his mother and father refused to just accept him, tied his arms and toes, beat him up badly and locked him up in a nook of the home. His father threatened to kill him.

“The violence was beyond anything I had imagined,” he says.

“I had thought whatever be my truth, I would be accepted, after all this was my family. But my parents were ready to kill me for their honour.”

For a lady in rural India, wanting to claim the suitable to determine as a trans man might result in sharp retaliation.

Manoj says he was pulled out of the village faculty in one in all India’s poorest states – Bihar in northern India – and forcibly married to a person twice his age.

“I even contemplated taking my own life, but my girlfriend stood by me through it all. That I am alive, and we are together now, is because she didn’t give up on me,” he says.

India decriminalised homosexual intercourse in 2018, however same-sex marriages are nonetheless not recognised. The Supreme Court heard 21 petitions asking for legalisation this 12 months and a ruling is anticipated quickly.

While others have argued for the suitable to marry as a matter of equality, Manoj and Rashmi’s petition, filed collectively with two {couples} and 4 LGBTQ+ feminist activists, asserts that marriage is a approach out of the brutal bodily and psychological violence inflicted on them by their very own households.

“Legal recognition of our relationship is the only way out of this life of fear,” Manoj says.

India has half-a-million transgender individuals, as counted within the final census in 2011, a quantity that activists imagine is a gross underestimation.

In 2014, the Supreme Court had dominated that trans individuals be recognised because the third gender. Five years later, India handed a legislation that prohibits discrimination in training, employment, healthcare and criminalises offences in opposition to them, together with bodily, sexual, emotional and financial abuse.

But violence from households is a fancy problem.

Most legal guidelines and the society understand household by blood, marriage, or adoption because the most secure area for people, says Mumbai-based feminist lawyer Veena Gowda.

“Familial violence is not unknown to any of us, be it against the wife, children, or queer trans people. But it is made consciously invisible, as seeing it and acknowledging it would mean questioning the very institution of ‘family’,” she says.

Ms Gowda was a part of a panel comprising a retired choose, legal professionals, academicians, activists and a authorities social employee that heard detailed testimonies of familial violence confronted by 31 individuals from the LGBTQ+ group in a closed-door public listening to.

Its findings have been revealed in April this 12 months in a report titled, ‘Apno ka bahut lagta hai’ (Our personal damage us essentially the most) that beneficial that LGBTQ+ individuals be given the suitable to decide on their very own household.

“Seeing the nature of violence faced by the testifiers, it would amount to denying them their very right to life and life with dignity if they do not have a right to choose their own family, free from violence,” Ms Gowda says.

“The right to marry would be a way of creating this new family and redefining it.”

A couple of months after his compelled marriage, Manoj tried to get collectively once more with Rashmi, however was tracked down by his “spouse”, who he says threatened to sexually assault each of them.

They escaped to the closest railway station and boarded the primary prepare that was leaving however he says they have been discovered by their household and introduced residence to a contemporary spherical of beatings.

“He was being forced to sign a ‘suicide letter’ that blamed me for his death,” Rashmi recounts.

Manoj’s resistance meant he was locked up once more and his cell phone taken away.

It was solely after Rashmi contacted a LGBTQ+ feminist useful resource group and the ladies cell of the native police that they have been capable of get safety and escape Manoj’s household residence.

They moved right into a authorities shelter for trans individuals however needed to transfer out quickly as Rashmi isn’t a transgender particular person.

Manoj was additionally capable of break up. But assist techniques that assist in escaping violent households and constructing a brand new life are few.

Koyel Ghosh, who makes use of “they” and “them” as private pronouns, is the managing trustee of Sappho for Equality, the primary Lesbian-Bisexual-Transmasculine individuals rights collective in japanese India that began 20 years in the past. They keep in mind clearly the day in 2020 they bought a helpline name a few couple who had run away to a metropolis in japanese India however then needed to sleep on the footpath for seven nights.

“We rented a space and put them there so that they had temporary shelter for three months and they could focus on getting a job as that is the only way they can build a new life,” Koyel says.

Apart from social stigma, the specter of violence at residence, disrupted training and compelled marriages, many trans individuals additionally battle to search out steady employment.

India’s final census confirmed that their literacy fee at 49.76% was a lot decrease than the nation’s 74.04%.

According to a survey of 900 trans individuals in Delhi and Uttar Pradesh by the National Human Rights Commission in 2017, 96% had been denied jobs or compelled into begging and intercourse work.

Saphho has arrange a shelter to assist runaway {couples} rebuild their lives – 35 {couples} have been housed there prior to now two years.

It’s robust work. Koyel will get three to 5 misery calls every day and frequently reaches out to a assist community of legal professionals to search out options.

“I have received death threats, faced mobs in villages, hostility in police stations because I am also open with my queer identity and they just can’t deal with it,” Koyel says.

When Asif, a trans man, and his girlfriend, Samina, reached out to Koyel, they have been at their native police station in a village in japanese India.

Samina alleges that the constables referred to as her a eunuch and stated she ought to have died as an alternative of going public along with her relationship.

Childhood friends-turned-lovers, they’d fled their households twice earlier than however have been introduced again. This was their final likelihood to flee they usually wanted assist.

“It was only when Koyel arrived that the police’s bad behaviour stopped. A senior officer chided their juniors for their prejudice and ignorance of laws as public servants,” Samina says.

Now residing safely in a giant metropolis, the couple are co-petitioners with Manoj and Rashmi within the Supreme Court.

“We are happy now. But we need that piece of paper, a marriage certificate, to deter our families and community with fear of penalties or police action,” Asif says.

“If the Supreme Court doesn’t help us, we may have to die. We will never be accepted as we are, will remain on the run, always afraid of being separated,” he says.

Names of petitioners have been modified to guard their identities.

BBC News India is now on YouTube. Click here to subscribe and watch our documentaries, explainers and options.