DAVE DAVIES, HOST:

This is FRESH AIR. I’m Dave Davies. Try as chances are you’ll, you will not discover many distinguished Republicans within the U.S. uttering a harsh phrase about Donald Trump – until, that’s, you learn the brand new biography of Utah Senator Mitt Romney by my visitor, Atlantic employees author McKay Coppins. In it, for instance, Romney reviews that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell instructed him across the time of the primary Trump impeachment trial that the president is, quote, “an idiot” who does not assume when he says issues.

McKay’s e-book is stuffed with anecdotes which have generated buzz among the many Washington press corps, nevertheless it’s greater than that. It’s a outstanding account of Romney’s reflecting on his many a long time in politics, together with his time period as governor of Massachusetts, his two unsuccessful runs for president, his entry to the Senate in his 70s, and his many efforts to thwart Donald Trump’s drives for the White House, which proceed at the moment. Romney, presently a senator from Utah, has introduced he will not search reelection in 2024.

Romney gave McKay lengthy interviews in addition to tons of of pages of personal journals, private correspondence and delicate emails for his analysis. In the e-book, Romney considers how his social gathering has turn out to be one through which, as he put it, lots of its members do not consider within the Constitution, and he displays on his position in enabling modifications he finds so troubling.

McKay Coppins covers nationwide politics, faith and the media for The Atlantic. He’s the writer of “The Wilderness,” a earlier e-book in regards to the battle for the way forward for the Republican Party. His new e-book is “Romney: A Reckoning.” Well, McKay Coppins, welcome again to FRESH AIR.

MCKAY COPPINS: Thank you for having me.

DAVIES: You know, I’d such as you to start with an anecdote that is gotten a whole lot of consideration in Washington from this expertise, and that is when the Mueller report on Russian interference within the election was full however wasn’t public. We simply had that abstract from Attorney General Bill Barr, which Trump thought to be exoneration, in fact. Mitt Romney is within the Senate Caucus Room with the opposite Republican members of the Senate, and President Trump stops in. Tell us what occurred.

COPPINS: He’s instantly greeted with a standing ovation. The senators – they’re type of treating him like a conquering hero, proper? And Trump, as is his wont, launched into some type of rambling stream-of-consciousness remarks. He talks in regards to the Russia hoax and relitigating the midterm elections. And, you realize, he is hitting all of his favourite coverage factors about China tariffs and border safety and, you realize, simply type of rambling. And at one level, Trump even mentioned that the GOP would quickly turn out to be the social gathering of well being care.

And Romney type of appeared across the room, noticed all of the senators nodding dutifully in settlement together with every little thing that Trump was saying, after which as quickly because the president left, all the Republican caucus burst into laughter.

DAVIES: You know, what’s fascinating about that’s that, you realize, members of the Senate, notably with members of their very own social gathering, regard issues that occur in a convention room and in personal conversations as, you realize, confidential and that that can be revered. In this e-book, Romney tells you all types of stuff that individuals mentioned to him that are embarrassing. You, in fact, went to verify this with, you realize, these concerned. How did they react to all this info attending to you?

COPPINS: It was a variety of reactions. I imply, I ought to say, to start with, that, you realize, Romney himself was considerably conflicted about sharing all this personal, behind-the-scenes info as a result of, as you say, there may be an understanding, an assumption of issues taking place inside these caucus rooms as being type of, you realize, confidential – like, that everyone goes to respect one another’s privateness and never share them publicly, proper?

The reactions from the individuals who have been contained in the room ranged from, you realize, blithe dismissal to outrage to some outright anger. But I believe greater than something, lots of people have been simply shocked. They have been shocked that one in every of their very own was keen to type of pull the curtain again and reveal what was happening in these caucus rooms. And Romney himself, you realize – in some instances, I needed to pull it out of him. In different instances, he type of would vent to me.

But he – I believe what finally led him to share all this was simply the hypocrisy. I believe he had a tough time with seeing so lots of his Senate colleagues act a technique in public and act a special means in personal, and I believe that is what finally brought about him to share this all with me.

DAVIES: You know, I discussed within the introduction Mitch McConnell’s remark to Romney that Trump was, quote, “an idiot” wasn’t the one unflattering factor that comes out in there about McConnell. I assume you tried to achieve him. What did he say about this stuff?

COPPINS: His workplace mentioned that he did not recall the conversations or did not recall them the way in which that Mitt Romney recalled them however then did not provide any particulars to dispute them straight. So, you realize, it was an fascinating mission as a result of all through this complete course of, Mitt Romney was sharing this stuff with me type of in secret.

DAVIES: Yeah. You know, it is fascinating that, you realize, Mitt Romney went to the Senate in 2018, and this was at a time after Trump had been in workplace for 2 years. The Republican Party was totally below Trump’s sway. Mitt Romney was a freshman senator at age 71 – not the standard newcomer to this physique. Give us a way of his mindset when he got here to the Senate at this age, at this second.

COPPINS: Well, Mitt Romney had, in fact, been the Republican presidential nominee in 2012. He was a distinguished determine within the social gathering with connections with a whole lot of high Republicans, Republican donors. He had a relationship with Mitch McConnell earlier than he entered the Senate.

And it was fascinating. You know, he nonetheless thought in 2018 that he might come into the Senate and supply an alternate voice for his social gathering. He was nonetheless below the phantasm that Donald Trump may be remembered as a type of one-off fluke – proper? – and that the Republican Party, with the correct management and with someone like him talking out on behalf of what he thought of conventional Republican values, might steer the social gathering again towards a extra regular, classically conservative route.

And looking back, that clearly seems fairly naive, however on the time, Mitt Romney was optimistic. He believed that there have been nonetheless a whole lot of good folks within the social gathering. They have been simply scared. They have been nervous about Donald Trump. They did not perceive his recognition. They have been afraid of talking out towards him whereas, in the meantime, the worst folks in his social gathering – the – you realize, the white supremacists and, you realize, right-wing nationalists and the entire type of MAGA folks – have been emboldened.

And Romney believed that if he might get into the Senate, he might encourage and empower the most effective in his social gathering whereas pushing again towards the worst. What he discovered when he acquired to the Senate is that that was a lot more durable than he anticipated.

DAVIES: Right. He did are available in with some stature, having been the social gathering’s nominee solely six years earlier than. You’d assume it could rely for one thing. You know, we consider a senator’s way of life in Washington as each night, you are out attending occasions, networking. It’s fascinating that you just describe his was fairly totally different.

COPPINS: That was one of the crucial shocking issues once I started this course of. Once I started assembly with him for interviews, I started to go to his home. He has a townhouse a couple of mile from the Capitol, and I used to be struck by simply how remoted and even lonely he appeared. He had purchased this townhouse in hopes that his spouse and sons would come and go to him in Washington. But that did not occur fairly often. He had comparatively few mates in Washington. In his personal social gathering, he was turning into more and more a pariah, however he additionally did not really feel like he slot in with the Democratic Party. So, you realize, it was humorous. The first assembly I had at his townhouse, he confirmed me his freezer, which was filled with frozen salmon filets that he had gotten from Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski. And he instructed me, you realize, I do not actually like salmon, however I discover that if I cook dinner these after which put them on a hamburger bun and canopy them in ketchup, they make for OK dinners.

(LAUGHTER)

COPPINS: And, you realize, I’m sitting there. I’m like, this can be a man value tons of of hundreds of thousands of {dollars}. He’s a United States senator. Surely he might do higher than, you realize, salmon burgers in his personal home. But it seems, most evenings he would sit on a recliner in entrance of an enormous TV watching, you realize, Netflix exhibits and leafing by means of briefing supplies and consuming alone. And that was actually his life as a senator when he first acquired there.

DAVIES: We must take a break right here. Let me reintroduce you. We’re talking with McKay Coppins. He’s a employees author for The Atlantic, protecting politics, faith and the media. His new e-book is “Romney: A Reckoning.” We’ll proceed our dialog in only a second. This is FRESH AIR.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

DAVIES: This is FRESH AIR, and we’re talking with Atlantic employees author McKay Coppins, whose new e-book is an examination of Mitt Romney’s profession – his runs for president, his service within the Senate and his efforts to battle Donald Trump and the expansion of extremism inside the Republican Party. Coppins’ new e-book is named “Romney: A Reckoning.”

It’s fascinating, you realize, that Romney and Trump have a reasonably lengthy historical past. You write that type of within the early a part of that relationship, he by no means considered Trump as a critical man, however type of preferred him, proper?

COPPINS: Yeah. I used to be shocked by how far again that relationship went. It seems that Romney first met Trump in January of 1995, when he was invited to Mar-a-Lago to spend a while with Trump. This was when Romney was nonetheless in finance, and there was some enterprise cause for them to satisfy. And the way in which Romney type of tells the story of that first assembly is that he principally noticed Trump as not an actual enterprise man – he – extra of type of a cartoonish superstar. But, you realize, Romney additionally says that he isn’t above gawking at well-known folks, and he thought it could be type of a kick to hang around with him for a weekend at Mar-a-Lago. And you realize, every little thing in regards to the expertise on the time type of confirmed his instincts about Trump.

He mentioned that once they first pulled as much as Mar-a-Lago, there was a line of servants in white linen, you realize, ready to greet him as if they have been – he was, like, a king or a lord or one thing. And Romney remembered saying – simply pondering like, the place on earth are we? You know, he mentioned he’d by no means seen something like that in America. Later, when Trump gave him a tour of Mar-a-Lago, he type of was exhibiting off numerous issues on this home, this advanced that he had simply purchased, truly. And he confirmed him a set of gold coloured silverware. And Trump mentioned they did not know this was right here once they bought me the place. And it is value greater than I paid for the home. I’m going to make a fortune. And it is simply – it was humorous as a result of Romney principally got here away from the expertise saying, that was every little thing I wished out of this. You know, it was bizarre and memorable and an incredible story that I’ll inform folks, and I’ll most likely by no means see this man once more.

DAVIES: Right. Or not like he’ll have any influence on my life or the nation, which turned out to be fairly fallacious. You know, he ran for – Romney, that’s to say – Romney ran for president in 2008, did not get the Republican nomination, made one other profitable strive in 2012. And by then, he was a very sensible, skilled candidate with consultants who knew the way you had them handle relationships and picture. And by this time, Trump was a much more distinguished political determine. You know, he was speaking about birtherism and simply had rather a lot to say and had some affect inside the social gathering. He was type of an issue for Mitt Romney – wasn’t he? – throughout that marketing campaign?

COPPINS: He was. And, you realize – so on the time – that is in 2011, early 2012 – Trump had turn out to be this type of conservative political superstar as a result of he was floating these conspiracy theories about Barack Obama. He was getting on Fox News rather a lot. And there was a degree through the main marketing campaign that someone got here to Romney and mentioned, I do know you are going to hate this, however it’s worthwhile to let Donald Trump endorse you.

(LAUGHTER)

COPPINS: And Romney’s first response was, no means. This man is a buffoon. He will not assist me in any respect. I’ll look ridiculous standing subsequent to him. But principally, the case that was made to him was, you realize, Romney was already held in suspicion by a whole lot of voters within the Republican base. He was seen as too average. He got here from Massachusetts. His faith was type of alien to a whole lot of evangelical voters. And so he could not actually afford to show up his nostril at an endorsement from this, you realize, Fox News loudmouth, proper? And so, you realize, principally, Romney was satisfied that if he did not settle for Trump’s endorsement, Trump would go and endorse one in every of his main opponents, and it could harm him.

And so Romney finally relented. And there was this actually surreal occasion in Las Vegas on the Trump Hotel on the Strip there the place Donald Trump stood on stage with Mitt Romney and endorsed him. And Romney was embarrassed within the second. He was embarrassed looking back. If you watch the clip of Trump endorsing him, Romney is type of angling away from the digicam, and he instructed me he wished to be wherever aside from there, principally. In the second, he mentioned, there are some belongings you simply cannot think about taking place. This is one in every of them.

DAVIES: Right.

COPPINS: And in order that was how Romney considered Trump on the time. But he additionally acknowledged that to win the Republican nomination in that local weather, he was going to need to do some issues that he did not need to do. And I’ll let you know, a whole lot of our conversations concerned me type of urgent him to grapple with how a lot remorse he had over these selections and whether or not he needs he might do it otherwise.

DAVIES: Well, how a lot remorse did he have?

COPPINS: Well, you realize, what he instructed me is that within the case of this endorsement particularly, he is clearly embarrassed by it looking back, and he needs that he hadn’t executed it. He – however he additionally rejects the notion that some folks have prompt that his choice to embrace Trump through the 2012 primaries in some way set Trump as much as run for president 4 years later. Romney principally argues that Trump rode a type of wild, unpredictable populist wave into the White House, and that will have occurred with or with out Romney. But, you realize, there is a – and I believe that is a – you realize, he has a good case to make there.

But I believe this additionally will get at a number of the rationalizations that he is employed over the course of his profession. And that is type of a operating theme of the e-book, that at numerous factors in his life and profession, he has discovered methods to persuade himself that essentially the most politically handy factor can be the correct factor. And he admits to that and now says that at this stage of his political profession, he is making an attempt actually onerous to be on guard towards that intuition for rationalization ‘trigger he is aware of he has it in him.

DAVIES: Right. Well, that is a malaise not unusual amongst bold politicians, for positive. You know, he needed to handle Trump’s ego throughout that 2012 marketing campaign. And then election night time was type of fascinating. Romney truly thought he was going to win, after which he needed to make a fast concession speech. Trump’s habits that night time was an fascinating little portent, wasn’t it?

COPPINS: Indeed. Donald Trump had deliberate to be at what he thought was going to be a victory social gathering for Mitt Romney in Boston on election night time. Once he realized that Romney had misplaced, Trump determined to not go to the social gathering, acquired on his airplane and, from his airplane, started tweeting in regards to the election being stolen. He mentioned, we won’t let this occur. We ought to march on Washington and cease this travesty. Our nation is completely divided. Let’s battle like hell and cease this nice and disgusting injustice. This election is a complete sham and a travesty. We should not a democracy. Revolution. And for the time being, comparatively few folks even paid consideration. But clearly, looking back, a type of horrifying foreshadowing of issues to return.

DAVIES: You know, the opposite factor I’ve to ask you about is his reflection on that marketing campaign towards Barack Obama. This was 2012. Obama was up for reelection. And, you realize, Romney got here to treat him as somebody who was, you realize, dishonorable, who couldn’t be trusted, whose reelection can be a catastrophe for the nation. Does he nonetheless assume that?

COPPINS: One factor he instructed me upon rereading a number of the journals that he gave me – as a result of he’d stored intensive, detailed journals all through his 2012 presidential marketing campaign. And in these journals, he would usually write about, you realize, simply how calamitous it could be if Barack Obama received reelection and the way dishonorable his marketing campaign was and the way dishonest he was. And what was fascinating is that when Romney gave me these journals, he went again and reread a few of them. And he mentioned, you realize, these now, you may actually inform, to start with, that I used to be within the warmth of a presidential marketing campaign and feelings have been operating excessive. But additionally, I simply had no concept how a lot worse it might get, proper?

You know, he mentioned, in hindsight, Barack Obama was a, you realize, completely advantageous president that I disagreed with. And he even mentioned he – his – he had – you realize, his character was robust, and he was a very good man, a very good household man, and I respect him. We simply disagreed on basic points. But he did not notice that there can be a second within the not-too-distant future when folks – the individual occupying the White House, you realize, did not simply disagree on primary coverage points, however disagreed on the elemental character of the nation. And so he has type of walked again a few of his harshest criticism of Obama.

DAVIES: Need to take one other break right here. We are talking with McKay Coppins. He’s a employees author for The Atlantic, protecting politics, faith and the media. His new e-book is “Romney: A Reckoning.” He’ll be again to speak extra after this brief break. I’m Dave Davies, and that is FRESH AIR.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

DAVIES: This is FRESH AIR. I’m Dave Davies. We’re talking with Atlantic employees author McKay Coppins, whose new e-book is a mirrored image on the political journey of Mitt Romney, who was the Republican Party’s nominee for president in 2012 and is now ending his profession as senator from Utah with a time period that ends subsequent 12 months. Romney gave Coppins intensive interviews, in addition to private journals and different data to discover why he believes extremism has taken such a powerful maintain amongst Republicans. Coppins’s e-book is “Romney: A Reckoning.”

So as 2016 approached, Romney considered making one other run for president and did not. And then he sees Donald Trump announce and immediately choose up momentum. What shocked him about Trump’s success?

COPPINS: Well, there have been a whole lot of issues about Trump’s rise that shocked him, however his first shock got here in simply how simply Trump was capable of climate the backlash over numerous outrageous issues he mentioned. You know, Mitt Romney, as a presidential candidate, had been so cautious and so disciplined. And then Donald Trump – you realize, he instructed me it appeared like he mentioned one thing day by day that if Romney had mentioned on the marketing campaign path, it could have been the top of his profession, proper? But there was one thing about Trump’s audaciousness, his – the quantity of scandals and controversial feedback that principally made him type of Teflon, proper? And in order that was the very first thing that shocked Romney.

Romney may even admit that it took him too lengthy to take Trump critically as a candidate. For the primary, you realize, 5, six months of Trump’s marketing campaign, Romney simply assumed he would flame out. Romney himself, when he had run for president, had confronted a collection of much less critical challengers who would spike within the polls after which type of fade away – folks like Herman Cain or Newt Gingrich or Rick Santorum. And Romney assumed Trump was going to be a type of. By the time Trump was on the verge of clinching the nomination, it was virtually too late to do something about it, however that did not cease him from making an attempt.

DAVIES: Right. It’s fascinating that this was a time when he himself was neither in elected workplace nor in search of it, however he actually made stopping Trump his precedence. And I do not keep in mind – or possibly I by no means knew – simply how onerous he had labored to marshal different candidates into methods to attempt to cease him – Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, John Kasich. I imply, there’s a whole lot of fascinating moments in these efforts. You need to share one or two with us?

COPPINS: Yeah. I did not learn about this, both. I imply, frankly, I realized about this stuff from his emails when he printed off, I believe, you realize, hundreds of emails that he had written to and acquired from numerous high-profile Republican politicians over time. And in that trove of emails, there was this type of outstanding story of – you realize, from principally February to May of 2016, Mitt Romney labored fairly onerous behind the scenes to do something he might to cease Trump from successful the Republican nomination. He started by making an attempt to dealer a unity ticket between Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.

And what he discovered was that each of the candidates, once they talked to him, would say, oh, yeah, yeah. That’s an incredible concept. Let’s do this. But then days would go by, and nothing would occur, and he could not get the campaigns to coordinate, and he could not get them on the identical web page. And Romney grew to become pissed off by simply how a lot the type of short-term pondering and ego and ambition and, frankly, in his phrases, delusion made it inconceivable for the remainder of the Republican Party to coordinate towards Trump.

DAVIES: You know, one of many issues that Mitt Romney did throughout that marketing campaign was early on in March, he held a information convention through which he referred to as Donald Trump a phony and a fraud. And, you realize, that is the previous nominee of the social gathering. It made some information, and it definitely set Trump off into, you realize, a spasm of condemnation however, ultimately, did not make that a lot distinction. But it type of put him on document as seeing Trump as a menace. Trump, in fact, wins the election. And then after that, I believe you mentioned Romney was on a golf course when he will get a name from Mike Pence, who desires what?

COPPINS: He says that Donald Trump desires to satisfy with him about Romney probably serving as his secretary of state. As you may think about, Romney is bowled over by this provide and initially suspects that it is some type of lure – proper? – as a result of he had been such an outspoken critic of Trump’s. He’s assured that the provide is real. They need to discuss, see if it could work out. And so Romney decides to take the assembly.

And that is one other a type of moments the place, you realize, I pressed Romney to consider why he agreed to do that. And, you realize, he instructed me there are type of two elements in his choice to entertain the concept of serving in a Trump administration. One was, you realize, he felt like he might do some good there. He was nervous in regards to the state of the nation, the state of the world in a Trump administration. He thought that this could possibly be an actual emergency and that it could be vital to have an grownup within the room.

He was additionally receiving calls from former secretaries of state and former presidents, each events, telling him that if he will get the provide that he has to take it for the nice of the nation. So that is the noble reasoning. But then, you realize, Romney admitted to me there was one other rationale right here which is that he simply wished the job. He wished the ability. But ultimately, it grew to become very clear to each him and Trump that it simply wasn’t going to work out.

DAVIES: You know, the outline of the conferences are fascinating as a result of what Romney says is, look. I’ve some situations for this. They are issues like, you do not get to choose the ambassadors. I’m going to choose my very own workforce. I desire a weekly assembly with the president. Other issues to make – you realize, make it an expert overseas service. And they’ve a gathering after which a second assembly. And it appears as if the crucial factor was Trump wanted Mitt Romney to face up and say publicly, I used to be fallacious. Donald Trump is terrific.

COPPINS: That’s proper. None of these situations you talked about have been sticking factors for Trump. At least, he did not specific any concern about them within the assembly. What was way more vital to him was that Romney retract his criticism of Trump and simply type of totally publicly repent of it. And, you realize, Romney repeatedly needed to inform Trump and his workforce, like, I can not do this. I’ll look ridiculous. And there was one night after he had a dinner at a restaurant in New York City with Trump that Romney went out and took questions from reporters and principally determined, OK, I’ll go so far as I can. And he mentioned, you realize, I appreciated the speech that Trump gave on election night time. I believed it was very, you realize, gracious and presidential. I’m inspired by a number of the folks he is including to his administration, and I’m hopeful that he might put our nation heading in the right direction. That was so far as he felt he might go in type of auditioning for this job. But he instantly acquired a name from Trump saying, that is not sufficient, it’s a must to go additional. And Romney wasn’t keen to, and so finally the job was by no means given to him.

DAVIES: And then Trump and his allies jumped throughout it, saying, that is Mitt Romney, the man who begged for my endorsement in 2012 and did not work out so nicely. Let’s take one other break right here after which we’ll discuss some extra. Let me reintroduce you. We’re talking with McKay Coppins. He’s a employees author for The Atlantic protecting politics, faith and the media. His new e-book is “Romney: A Reckoning.” We’ll proceed our dialog after this brief break. This is FRESH AIR.

(SOUNDBITE OF SLOWBERN’S “WHEN WAR WAS KING”)

DAVIES: This is FRESH AIR. And we’re talking with Atlantic employees author McKay Coppins, whose new e-book is an exploration of Mitt Romney’s profession, his runs for president, his service within the Senate, and his efforts to battle Donald Trump and the expansion of extremism inside the Republican Party. Coppins’ new e-book Is “Romney: A Reckoning.”

So Mitt Romney, I assume, is within the final chapter of his political profession, serving as a senator from Utah, which, you realize – I do not know. He hadn’t actually lived there a lot. He had served on the Olympic Committee there. But Orrin Hatch, who had held the seat for thus lengthy, had reached out to him. And so he received that seat. It’s fascinating. It’s a seat with a whole lot of Mormons in a state that Trump had by no means executed so nicely in. But he goes to the Senate. And among the many issues he says he desires to do is definitely work on actual points, and he gave you an actual checklist of them. It’s huge issues like – what? – local weather change and smaller issues like compensation for faculty athletes. And so he, you realize, begins introducing himself to senators saying let’s work collectively. What are these encounters like?

COPPINS: Early on, he is instructed by one in every of his Senate colleagues, look, 20 senators do all of the work right here and 80 of them simply go alongside for the trip (laughter). And so Romney determined early on that he wished to be a workhorse. He wished to be seen as someone who is able to roll up his sleeves and work on coverage with members of both social gathering. But what he discovered was that even amongst those that have been actually – you realize, noticed themselves as legislators, there was not a whole lot of long-term pondering within the Senate. Climate change was an instance.

You know, he assumed that – and I believe this speaks to type of Romney’s institutionalism – that someplace in some room within the United States authorities, there have been serious-minded, considerate individuals who had a grasp plan for tackle these type of generational points that America was going through. And with local weather change, for instance, you realize, he had an inventory of very detailed questions. He mentioned, OK, if we’ll switch to renewable power, we have to have, you realize, sustainable sources of lithium and all these different supplies that can assist, you realize, create batteries, for instance. And then we won’t be depending on China as a result of they’re aggressive with us. So what is the plan?

And when he would carry up these type of detailed points together with his Senate colleagues, he would type of get clean stares. And that discouraged him as a result of, you realize, he had a lot religion within the Senate as the nice deliberative physique with, you realize, critical folks engaged on critical points. And what he discovered was that lots of people weren’t keen on engaged on points in any respect, and even those who weren’t fairly as within the weeds as he would love them to be.

DAVIES: Right, he says the hearings have been by no means actually about getting info, they have been an opportunity to, you realize, preen for cable tv. You know, I’ve to say, I imply, this type of made me cease in my tracks. You’ve coated Washington for a very long time. I’m wondering what your response is to the notion that 20 senators do the work, 80 of them are simply there for the trip or to get on tv. You know, each one in every of these senators has press places of work that generates details about, you realize, the nice tasks they’re bringing dwelling and the brave positions they’ve taken on points. Is that actually true, that 80 of them simply aren’t doing a lot?

COPPINS: It’s a very good query. I imply, look, you realize, possibly the precise quantity is 75 or 70 or no matter.

DAVIES: (Laughter).

COPPINS: But, I imply, I’ll say that as a reporter protecting Washington, I’m usually shocked by, you realize, how few elected leaders appear to truly be engaged every day in actual legislating. I imply, a part of it’s simply structural, the way in which that our system is about up. A number of these guys need to spend an inordinate period of time elevating cash, you realize, calling fundraisers, donors, determining come up with the money for to run for reelection. Even within the Senate, the place they’ve longer phrases, it nonetheless looks like they’re always fascinated with their manufacturers. And they see their seats as platforms to share factors of view, however not essentially to, you realize, get within the weeds on laws and get legal guidelines handed.

I do not assume it at all times was this manner. You know, if you discuss to people who find themselves older than me and have extra expertise in Washington, they are going to say that, you realize, 30, 40 years in the past, it possibly would have been flipped. There can be 20 senators who have been, you realize, present horses, however the different 80 actually wished to get stuff executed. I believe that due to how polarized our nation has gotten, how dysfunctional our establishments are, we have begun to draw individuals who do not have as a lot curiosity in truly doing the work. And Mitt Romney definitely was a witness to that.

DAVIES: You write that Romney referred to as the Senate a membership for previous males, that means what?

COPPINS: (Laughter) Well, this was a very fascinating perception. He principally mentioned, on some superficial stage, you realize, it is a whole lot of previous folks. We have on-site barbers and medical doctors, and everyone wears orthopedic footwear. But, you realize, on a extra critical stage, he instructed me he had not realized simply how a lot psychic foreign money his Senate colleagues connected to their jobs. It virtually was as if, you realize, dropping reelection was akin to dying for them, proper? There have been – a whole lot of his colleagues have been of their 60s, 70s, even some of their 80s. And to them, the relevance and energy and significance related to their place was important to their lives. It was central to their identities. And what it meant was that each choice they made got here again to, will this assist me get reelected? In truth, he had a Senate colleague inform him explicitly, if you’re mulling a vote, the primary query it’s best to ask your self is, will this assist me get reelected? And then secondary, he mentioned, was, will this assist my state and my constituents? I imply, that one, to me, was type of the surprising one as a result of that’s outstanding – proper? – to assume that his Senate colleagues are simply saying out loud that reelection is an important factor to think about. And it looks like that is a reasonably widespread sentiment in Washington within the Senate, even when they’d by no means say it publicly.

DAVIES: Yeah, that may be a fairly dispiriting thought. And you write that Romney – his response, which he did not at all times say, was, you realize, dropping an election shouldn’t be the worst factor that may occur. Trust me. I’ve executed it.

COPPINS: That’s what he mentioned. He mentioned, take it from somebody who is aware of, proper? I’ve misplaced loads of elections. You know, he usually says dropping a presidential election is possibly essentially the most devastating factor that may occur to a politician. And, you realize, as soon as you’ve got executed it, it provides you slightly little bit of perspective. And so he would usually attempt to assist his Senate colleagues perceive that, you realize, there are worse issues than dropping reelection within the Senate.

DAVIES: We must take a break right here. Let me reintroduce you. We’re talking with McKay Coppins. He’s a employees author for The Atlantic protecting politics, faith and the media. His new e-book is “Romney: A Reckoning.” We’ll proceed our dialog in only a second. This is FRESH AIR.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

DAVIES: This is FRESH AIR, and we’re talking with Atlantic employees author McKay Coppins, whose new e-book is an examination of Mitt Romney’s profession – his runs for president, his service within the Senate and his efforts to battle Donald Trump and the expansion of extremism inside the Republican Party. Coppins’ new e-book is named “Romney: A Reckoning.”

One of the extra fascinating episodes that you just describe is Romney through the impeachment trial involving Trump and his actions in Ukraine. And it was fascinating the posture that the Republican majority chief, Mitch McConnell, took on the problems there. One of them was whether or not the Senate ought to name extra witnesses to get extra info. What was McConnell’s strategy in advising his caucus?

COPPINS: What struck Romney was that McConnell did not hassle defending Trump’s actions. He basically instructed his caucus, look. This is a political course of. You should not neutral jurors. You ought to act like politicians on this course of. And even in personal with Mitt Romney, he type of pulled Romney apart at one level and principally mentioned, look. We do not need to drag this out. It’s going to harm a few of our extra susceptible Republican senators in reelection. And so I need you to affix us in voting to shortly finish this Senate trial so we are able to transfer on.

And what was fascinating to Romney is that he did not make any type of case for why Trump should not be held accountable. Instead, McConnell principally argued that defending the GOP Senate majority was important. He mentioned if Trump misplaced reelection and Republicans misplaced management of the Senate, this apocalyptic state of affairs would play out the place Democrats would, you realize, cross the Green New Deal and Medicare for All and switch Puerto Rico and D.C. into states in order that they may engineer a everlasting Senate majority. And it was principally a explicitly partisan argument that had nothing to do with Trump or the issues he was accused of and completely about defending Republican energy.

DAVIES: Right. So by no means thoughts the necessity for getting actual info as a result of, you keep in mind, there have been administration witnesses who hadn’t instructed their a part of the story. Never thoughts that. Never thoughts the constitutional obligation to take it critically. The the patriotic factor to do is to make certain Republicans maintain the Senate. Yeah. You know, because the 2020 election approached, what position did Mitt Romney see for himself, if any, in heading off one other Trump win?

COPPINS: By 2020, Romney had voted to convict Trump, as the one Republican to take action, and had basically turn out to be a pariah in his social gathering. He was a villain within the conservative media. Fox News would, you realize, routinely beat up on him within the – in primetime exhibits. He truly, you realize, usually could not exit into public with out conservatives coming as much as berate him. You know, folks would yell, traitor, at him from automobile home windows and confront him at airports. And he knew that, at this level, he had comparatively little sway within the Republican Party. You know, 4 years earlier, he thought that he might possibly nonetheless steer the social gathering in the correct route. Even two years earlier, when he had first entered the Senate, he had hope that he might, you realize, forge a brand new path for Republicans. By 2020, he was fairly satisfied that this was Donald Trump’s social gathering now, he was not going to have a whole lot of affect. And so he determined to put low. You know, as you will recall, that is the start of the pandemic. He spent a whole lot of time alone in his home and in his workplace making an attempt to work on laws, to little avail. And, you realize, he felt politically homeless at that time. He did not really feel like he might vote for a Democrat, however he definitely knew he wasn’t going to assist Donald Trump’s reelection.

DAVIES: You know, you bought all this info from Mitt Romney, all these interviews and private journals and emails and such, however you did not simply depend on that. You’re a reporter, you went and checked with others to confirm their accuracy or get extra context and perspective. One of the agreements that you just made with him within the mission was that he would get to learn the manuscript earlier than it was revealed, however you’ll resolve what goes in. I assume he learn it. What did he assume?

COPPINS: He did. And, you realize, he – (laughter) I’ll provide you with my view. I believe he, at first when he learn it, was shocked and possibly slightly nervous by how a lot he had instructed me over the course of the 2 years.

DAVIES: I can think about that.

COPPINS: There have been just a few moments after he had learn it the place he expressed some concern about, you realize, whether or not sure relationships would survive or how he can be a pariah within the Senate. But I’ll give him credit score for this – on the finish of the day, he actually did not demand that I take something out that was, you realize, vital. There have been a few issues that, you realize, he made the case weren’t fairly in the correct context. And upon my, you realize, additional reporting alone half, I agreed with him. But when it comes to the core story, he type of determined to let it communicate for itself. And I believe that he deserves credit score for that.

DAVIES: You know, the entire, you realize, mass dysfunction that we see and bitter partisanship in all places, you realize, like within the battle over who’s going to be speaker of the House, what do you assume you will be writing about sooner or later?

COPPINS: I imply, I can solely hope that I’m not writing the identical story over and over. But I’ll say, one of many discouraging issues about being a political journalist proper now could be that it feels on some stage prefer it’s the identical story simply replaying over and over. I imply, I first began protecting politics through the summer time of 2010, the rise of the Tea Party, and I keep in mind pondering this was one thing new and novel. And all these type of right-wing populist figures with no political expertise have been coming to Congress, and what would that appear to be?

And over the following couple of years, we noticed a whole lot of dysfunction. We noticed a whole lot of, you realize, supposedly unprecedented moments in American politics. And it looks like that dysfunction has simply replayed over and over and over. And I do not know the way the cycle of partisanship breaks, this type of harmful cycle of polarization and, you realize, damaging partisanship. But it does really feel like, if I’m being type of pessimistic, that is what I’m going to be writing about indefinitely, so long as I’m protecting politics, as a result of I do not – I have never seen the way in which out but. The fever has not damaged.

DAVIES: Well, McKay Coppins, thanks a lot for talking with us once more.

COPPINS: Thank you for having me, I respect it.

DAVIES: McKay Coppins is a employees author for The Atlantic protecting politics, faith and the media. His new e-book is “Romney: A Reckoning.” On tomorrow’s present, author Scott Eyman talks about an American film star who was the topic of a 1,900-page FBI file, prevented from returning to the nation, scandalized for his affairs with younger girls, and was applauded and criticized for his satire of Adolf Hitler. Eyman’s new e-book is “Charlie Chaplin Vs. America: When Art, Sex, And Politics Collided.” I hope you may be part of us.

To sustain with what’s on the present and get highlights of our interviews, comply with us on Instagram at @nprfreshair.

(SOUNDBITE OF CARLA BLEY’S “REACTIONARY TANGO”)

DAVIES: We’re closing with music by jazz composer, arranger and pianist Carla Bley, who died final week as a result of problems of mind most cancers. She was 87. In a narrative commemorating Bley’s eightieth birthday, NPR’s Joel Rose wrote that Bley was one of many few girls to have exerted a constant affect on the male-dominated world of contemporary jazz for half a century.

(SOUNDBITE OF CARLA BLEY’S “REACTIONARY TANGO”)

DAVIES: FRESH AIR’s government producer is Danny Miller. Our technical director and engineer is Audrey Bentham. Our interviews and evaluations are produced and edited by Amy Salit, Phyllis Myers, Roberta Shorrock, Sam Briger, Lauren Krenzel, Heidi Saman, Ann Marie Baldonado, Seth Kelley, Thea Chaloner and Susan Nyakundi. Our digital media producer is Molly Seavy-Nesper. Therese Madden directed at the moment’s present. For Terry Gross and Tonya Mosley, I’m Dave Davies.

(SOUNDBITE OF CARLA BLEY’S “REACTIONARY TANGO”)

Copyright © 2023 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our web site terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional info.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This textual content will not be in its last type and could also be up to date or revised sooner or later. Accuracy and availability could fluctuate. The authoritative document of NPR’s programming is the audio document.