Sign up for notifications to the most recent Insight options through the BBC Sport app and discover the latest within the series

College soccer within the US is large enterprise. The sport, which kicked off its new season final weekend, is awash with cash.

The 65 universities within the prime 5 athletic conferences generated a mixed whole of greater than $3.3bn (£2.6bn) in income from their American soccer programmes alone final 12 months.

Starting subsequent season, the 18 universities within the Big Ten Conference – historically one of many strongest and most prestigious faculty gridiron competitions within the nation – will share greater than $1bn a 12 months (£792m) in tv broadcasting cash.

The coaches who run these prime soccer programmes additionally earn extraordinary sums. Nick Saban, coach on the University of Alabama, topped the record at $11.7m (£9.3m) in 2022. Kirby Smart, the University of Georgia head coach who has received the previous two nationwide championships, was simply behind, at $11.25m (£8.9m).

Name a state – Florida? Iowa? California? North Carolina? – and chances are high the very best earner on the federal government payroll is a university soccer coach at one of many state’s public universities.

The significance of the game within the United States goes past greenback figures, nonetheless. It is woven into the cultural cloth of communities throughout the nation – notably within the midwest and south, the place spectators fill stadiums, some with seating capacities of greater than 100,000.

Of the ten largest sports activities venues on the planet, eight are US faculty soccer stadiums. On Saturdays in autumn, the inhabitants of cities like Ann Arbor (University of Michigan), State College (Penn State), Tuscaloosa (Alabama) and Baton Rouge (Louisiana State) come near doubling in dimension as a result of arrival of loyal followers from throughout the area.

Outside the stadium partitions, a nationwide tv viewers numbers within the hundreds of thousands. Last 12 months’s nationwide championship sport between Georgia and Texas Christian University attracted 17 million viewers.

Thirty-five million tuned in to the 2006 nationwide championship sport between two undefeated faculty powers on the time, the University of Southern California and the University of Texas – a sport the Longhorns received with a dramatic last-ditch landing.

Despite being marinated in money, nonetheless, faculty soccer remains to be technically an beginner sport.

The gamers on whose backs the multi-billion-dollar business operates are usually not financially compensated by the schools for which they play.

They obtain scholarships to cowl tuition, housing and meals, in addition to month-to-month stipends for bills. Some scholarships are usually not assured, nonetheless, and so they all could be revoked for non-athletic causes. And whereas healthcare is offered for these enrolled in class, it doesn’t proceed after collegiate careers finish – even when the accidents sustained on the sphere linger.

College athletes who violated guidelines have been topic to extreme punishment.

It is an imbalance that has struck many faculty soccer observers as inherently unfair.

Consider the next reasoning:

“Nowhere else in America can businesses get away with agreeing not to pay their workers a fair market rate on the theory that their product is defined by not paying their workers a fair market rate.

“Enormous sums of cash circulation to seemingly everybody besides the scholar athletes. College presidents, athletic administrators, coaches, convention commissioners, and NCAA executives soak up six- and seven-figure salaries. Colleges construct lavish new amenities. But the scholar athletes who generate the revenues, lots of whom are African American and from lower-income backgrounds, find yourself with little or nothing.”

Those phrases have been written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh in an opinion concurring with a landmark 2021 Supreme Court resolution putting down limits on compensation for scholar athletes.

That decision, along with recent changes in collegiate rules prompted by lawsuits and state legislation, has cracked open the bank vault doors, allowing college athletes to begin to more fully enjoy some of their sport’s largess.

For the past two seasons, college players have able to sign deals to allow third parties to use their “title, picture or likeness” – NIL, for short – and receive money in return.

It could be as little as a few hundred dollars for an autograph-signing session or as much as hundreds of thousands of dollars for a national advertising campaign.

The money is flowing across every college sport. Some women’s basketball players claim to be earning more through endorsement deals in college than they would in the WNBA professional league.

A gymnast at Louisiana State University – Olivia Dunne – posed for the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue and says she earns more than half a million dollars for a single social media post.

But with about half of all NIL money going to college football according to industry estimates, it’s that sport’s star players who rank among the top earners.

Bryce Young, the University of Alabama quarterback chosen first in the NFL draft earlier this year, reportedly earned more than $3.5m (£2.8m) in NIL deals over the course of his collegiate career, with a sponsorship portfolio that included BMW, Beats by Dre and Dr Pepper.

Those Ohio State players who were suspended for free tattoos back in 2010? Now they could sign a sponsorship deal that gives them tattoos – and pays cash, too.

The new NIL rules have also provided a back door through which supporters of college football teams – whether deep-pocketed alumni or groups of casual fans – can step in to fill the void left by universities, funnelling money to players to reward them for performance on the field and, perhaps, lure more gifted athletes to join.

Supporters have pooled resources to form ‘collectives’ with names like Rising Spear (Florida State), Golden Touch (Notre Dame) and the Big Red Collaborative (Nebraska). A University of Texas group, Texas One, provides $50,000 a season to every offensive lineman on the Longhorn team – in exchange for a handful of charity appearances.

The ground on which college football’s business empire has been built is shifting.

Barney Amor began playing college football under the old rules. Born in the Netherlands to British parents, he grew up with European football, only taking up the American version while attending high school in Pennsylvania.

He set numerous school records for his kicking, however, drawing on his earlier experience playing the other kind of football as a youth. Colgate University, a small liberal arts school in central New York, gave him a scholarship to be the team’s punter – the player whose sole job is to kick the ball as far down the field to the opposing team as he can when his side’s offense sputters.

It was small-time college football, more akin to the way the game was played before the big television contracts and luxury stadiums changed the sport forever.

At Colgate, Amor recalls, the football games would only attract around a thousand fans. “And half of them have been mother and father of gamers,” he jokes.

Amor won recognition for his kicking skills, however. And after earning an undergraduate degree at Colgate and sitting idle because Covid caused the cancellation of the team’s 2020 season, he decided to try for the big time. He was admitted to graduate school at Penn State University and given a spot on the Nittany Lions team, where instead of playing in front of a few thousand fans, he was on the field before crowds of a hundred thousand – with millions more watching on television.

During his two years at Penn State – serving as the starting punter on a full-tuition scholarship in year two – Amor watched as NIL changed from a minor curiosity for players into a major undertaking.

“When it began, everybody thought it will be a pair hundred bucks,” he says. “But it is a primary provide and demand factor. How excessive are they keen to go?”

Pretty high, it turns out. He says now the top players on the team are driving fully loaded Teslas and Range Rovers that are provided through car dealership NIL endorsements.

“I feel it will get tough,” Amor says. “A crew is bringing in billion {dollars} by TV offers. But it is form of laborious to justify when the professors are bringing in a distinct realm of money.”

As the team’s punter, Amor was by no means a star. But after realising the potential of NIL income, he set out to turn what fame and attention he did have into a steady income. He says he visited the local business association and copied their membership directory. He then went down the list, pitching his endorsement services to anyone who would hear him out.

“If you make 100 cellphone calls and one in all them comes by, it is all value it,” he says.

Amor signed a deal with a local doughnut store. Because he liked to bring his own pillow to hotels the night before games, he inked an endorsement with a home goods store and carried one of its pillows as he walked into the stadium on game day.

He recorded a viral video for a Pennsylvania healthcare company in which he asked Penn State fans who didn’t recognise him how he could make the punter their favourite player.

“I feel the crazier concepts get much more media consideration,” he says. “You’ve bought to be a bit bit on the market.”

For his efforts, he was nominated as a 2023 NIL innovator of the year at the NIL Summit, a conference of sports professionals and college athletes.

He won university recognition for the highest grade-point average among seniors on the football team. And he had success on the field, finishing the 2022 season with the second-longest average punt distance in Penn State history, earning consideration for the national punter of the year trophy.

Amor says playing football at the highest level while attending classes and managing a growing NIL business took considerable effort, however.

“Whether it should necessary breakfast conferences, going to exercises, going to class, going to review corridor, going to satisfy with advisers, going to do additional work, every thing is scripted,” he says. “You’re speaking six, seven within the morning until generally 10 o’clock at night time.”

Some players, he said, are unable to juggle a loaded academic and athletic schedule while also handling their financial obligations. And others have the kind of financial success while in school that sets them up for trouble after graduation, when a professional football career doesn’t materialise and the money dries up.

“You change into accustomed to a life-style that is not sustainable,” he says. “And if you do not have the monetary intelligence or monetary background to do something about it, how do you alter?”

While the NIL money has been a boon for many athletes, there’s a growing concern among college administrators and other involved parties that the money now flowing to the players is spinning out of control.

As a professor of advertising at the University of Texas, Natalie Tindall says she has watched college athletes struggle to keep a handle on the changing NIL landscape.

“We must keep in mind that these persons are nonetheless of their teenagers and early twenties,” she says. “We’re asking them to be distinctive in athletics, teachers and this different new factor, with out realising how a lot of a time suck it may be.”

What is more, she says, much of the NIL effort is what is called aspirational labour – time, effort and money spent with no guarantee of an adequate financial return on the investment.

“It could be extremely overwhelming,” Tindall says.

The University of Texas tries to help. It has financial counsellors for all its student athletes. It offers classes on NIL, brand marketing, managing social media and sports negotiations. The university has also partnered with Opendorse, an NIL marketplace company, to allow its athletes to easily create a personalised web page where they can solicit and manage endorsements.

For instance, fans can offer at least $36 to get a personalised video greeting from Cedric Baxter, a top-rated Florida high-school running back who will play for the Longhorns this year. For $125, he will attend a local event. Autographs start at $258. There’s also a ‘deal builder’ function for businesses to customise a more lucrative pitch for Baxter’s services.

Last year’s starting Texas running back, Bijan Robinson, had a sponsorship deal with a local Lamborghini dealer – car lease included – and his own line of Dijon mustard in Texas grocery stores.

Robinson was drafted by the NFL and will play for the Atlanta Falcons this coming season. But in his last year of college, his NIL earning potential was estimated by college sports market analyst company On3 to be around $1.8m (£1.4m).

Opendorse’s chief executive Blake Lawrence played football at the University of Nebraska from 2007 to 2009, before quitting the game because of repeated head injuries. He says he would have loved to have been able to hustle for extra money while he was on the team. But even though his business now depends on the rapidly expanding world of NIL finances, he’s clear-eyed about what it means for the sport.

“NIL has opened a Pandora’s field that may’t be closed,” Lawrence says. “It’s going to separate the haves from the have-nots.”

For decades, the University of Alabama has been one of the haves in college football. The Crimson Tide, under head coach Saban, have won six national championships since 2009 and regularly recruit top-ranked classes of incoming high school athletes. The university’s athletic department ranked third in the nation in revenue in 2022, with $214m (£170m).

The school’s athletic director, Greg Byrne, sees storm clouds on the horizon, however.

For the moment, college football is the cash cow that funds a range of other university athletic programmes that don’t generate profits. If the money coming into athletic departments from donors and supporters is redirected to NIL payments to athletes, it could destabilise the whole system.

“We have a really flawed monetary mannequin,” Byrne says. “So the query is, the place does that cash come from, to have the ability to assist broad-based programming? I feel that is actually vital to ensure that’s a part of the dialogue.”

Byrne also bristles at the idea that college athletes are “unpaid labour”, noting that the university spends about $160,000 a year in room, board and tuition for scholarship recipients. He also notes that with off-campus housing allowances and government grants, Alabama athletes receive about $42,000 in tax-free cash to spend as they like.

“I feel these are issues that not less than have to be recognised within the dialog while you speak concerning the mannequin of what takes place in faculty sports activities,” he says.

Byrne says he would like to see guidelines and reforms implemented on a national level, through legislation in Congress, that will standardise what are currently a jumble of rules and regulations that vary from state to state.

There is a case to be made that schools and athletes should disclose their NIL receipts to separate fact from rumours. In one well publicised episode, a California high school quarterback thought he would receive a four-year, $13m endorsement deal from an NIL collective if he signed to play at the University of Florida. After he committed, the agreement fell through.

If athletic directors like Byrne are calling for national reform, some members of Congress are listening. Whether there is the political will to do anything about it, however, is an open question.

Legislators have proposed more than a dozen various laws, but so far none have advanced beyond the drafting stage.

“The essential query earlier than us at the moment is how Congress ought to regulate this new financial frontier to make sure that NIL offers are clear and truthful, and that they don’t compromise the integrity of faculty sports activities,” said Republican Gus Bilirakis, at a March hearing at the House of Representatives.

“The lack of uniformity throughout totally different states and establishments has created confusion and uncertainty, and a federal commonplace is required so all athletes are enjoying by the identical guidelines.”

What those rules could turn out to be, however, remains anybody’s guess, as the discussion among legislators during the hearing occasionally veered toward comedy, with good-natured sparring over college team allegiances.

After Congresswoman Kat Cammack of Florida placed a University of Florida football helmet behind her nameplate on the committee lectern, Congressman Buddy Carter, with the help of his staff, surrounded his with a University of Georgia football, one of his university’s helmets and a small figurine of the team’s bulldog mascot.

“We all love faculty athletics, and that is why we’re so involved about this,” Carter said. “We do not need to see it ruined.”

Jason Stahl, executive director of the College Football Players Association, was one of the panellists at the hearing. He said that although he opposes new federal regulations of college athletics, he didn’t hear anything new or concrete during the day’s proceedings.

“I feel the factor that stunned me probably the most is you’ve got Republican members of Congress who appear comfy utilizing the federal authorities to intervene on this one specific free market,” Stahl said. “Why this one factor? Should now we have the federal authorities coming in with an overbearing piece of laws to manipulate this one free market? I do not get it.”

If Stahl had his way, college athletes would come together in a union-like organisation that could license agents who deal with NIL contracts and could demand revenue-sharing and long-term health benefits directly from the universities.

Now that NIL has put increasing amounts of money in the hands of football players, the power dynamic in college athletics is shifting. Combined with loosened restrictions on transfers between schools, a college version of free agency – the player rights shift that changed US professional sports forever in the 1970s – is crashing through the college ranks.

Every year, thousands of players switch between teams – whether for more playing time, better professional prospects, friendlier coaching or, perhaps, more NIL money.

Stahl, who sees a future where college athletes break the back of an unjust system and are finally the ones calling the shots, believes he is on the winning side.

“I feel universities have to understand that athlete empowerment is right here to remain,” he stated.