Pork barrelling has an extended and inglorious historical past in Australian politics. Directing taxpayer cash to initiatives that events hope will win them votes – versus sharing it pretty the place it’s most wanted – has spawned scandals on either side of the parliamentary divide.

So when, within the lead-up to the 2019 federal election, a Liberal candidate introduced a $127,373 grant within the type of giant novelty cheque to a South Australian bowling membership, the blowback was swift. Photos posted to Georgina Downer’s Facebook web page confirmed the political eager for Mayo elevating a glass of champagne with members of the Yankallila bowling membership.

The sitting MP was not impressed. “In more than a decade of politics I’ve never seen a TAX-PAYER funded grant delivered by cheque with a candidate’s face and name on it,” Rebekha Sharkie tweeted. “Rather desperate and misleading.”

Downer defended her actions to native ABC Adelaide radio, saying she was “not presenting commonwealth money” as a result of the cheque was not authorized tender.

But Labor instantly referred to as on the auditor normal to research the Coalition’s group sport infrastructure program.

The scathing report that emerged in early 2020 led to a scandal that grew to become often called sports activities rorts, the resignation of a cupboard minister – and numerous legwork for Guardian Australia’s then chief political correspondent, Sarah Martin.

“I knew it was going to be bad,” Martin says, citing “mutterings in the corridors” of Parliament House within the days earlier than the findings dropped. “There were definitely people within government who were preparing.”

The auditor normal painted a damning picture of distributional bias, with the Coalition nearly fully ignoring Sport Australia’s merit-based rankings of viable initiatives and as an alternative funnelling $100m into marginal and precedence seats.

In the times that adopted Martin trawled by the auditor normal’s 76-page report “really, really thoroughly” – footnotes included – then fired off lists of inquiries to federal departments and commenced contacting sports activities golf equipment throughout the nation.

“It was a matter of going through the spreadsheets and looking at which clubs received grants and seeing where the political interest and conflict existed,” she says.

A tipoff from a member of the general public led her to disclose that simply weeks earlier than the election a rugby membership within the then MP Christopher Pyne’s marginal Adelaide seat won a $500,000 grant for upgrades including new female change rooms – regardless of not having a girls’s staff.

And the workplace of the sports activities minister, Bridget McKenzie, approved nine grants in key seats that it requested Sport Australia to evaluate after functions closed, despite the fact that the company had warned it was “not appropriate” or honest to simply accept the functions.

Further digging uncovered that the Coalition had spent a separate $150m sports grant fund – the feminine amenities and water security stream program – with out opening it to public functions. Just $10m of that cash went to rural areas.

Martin had already been looking into the government’s regional jobs and investment program, itself the topic of another searing indictment from the Australian National Audit Office.

“Unfortunately, there is to a certain extent, acceptance of pork barrelling,” Martin says.

In 1994 Labor’s Ros Kelly give up Paul Keating’s ministry within the first sports activities rorts affair, after revealing that funding for sporting teams had been handed out based mostly on discussions round a whiteboard in her workplace.

“The key problem is you have this conflict,” Martin says. “The department goes through a rigorous merit-based assessment process, makes recommendations, and the government chooses to blatantly ignore it and say, ‘We’ve got our own spreadsheet with margins of electorates, which is more important than whether or not the projects are any good.’”

In the case of sports activities rorts, the controversy and the drip-drip-drip of revelations grew increasingly more damaging for Scott Morrison’s authorities.

“It bled out of Canberra,” she says, “and actually cut through into the real world.”

She remembers the day the Department of Health’s responses on the $150m grant program lastly got here by. “I’d been going insane, trying to get information from the department about it,” she says.

“After days of back and forth, they finally sent me some answers at 7pm on a Wednesday night. It was the last thing I felt like doing but thankfully, we got the story out, despite their best efforts.”

Ultimately McKenzie fell on her sword amid outrage a couple of $500,000 grant to a Coalition colleague’s Northern Territory gun club, for which she was discovered to be in breach of ministerial requirements. It also emerged that she authorized a grant of $36,000 to a different taking pictures membership with out disclosing that she was a member.

“I maintain that at no time did my membership of shooting sports clubs influence my decision making, nor did I receive any personal gain,” she stated after asserting her resignation. “However, I acknowledge that my failure to declare my memberships in a timely manner constituted a breach of the prime minister’s ministerial standards.”

Martin says: “When a minister is engulfed in that sort of scandal, it’s often the war of attrition – all these stories that show terrible decisions and blatant pork barrelling and keeps the pressure on.

“Bam, bam, bam – every day there’s another story about how outrageous this program was, and the government is always calculating, ‘How damaging is this? Can we just ride it out?’

“McKenzie’s head had to roll. But I don’t think that’s because they believe they did anything wrong. It’s just that they calculated that the media coverage was becoming too damaging.”

She remembers asking Morrison on the National Press Club whether or not he believed it was applicable for public funds for use for political acquire.

“It was quite an awkward confrontation with him,” she says. “By that stage, the rot had started to set in a little bit. Once McKenzie resigned he attempted to stem the damage … but I think that stench still stuck.”

And what has modified, Martin says, is the extent of scrutiny now utilized to grant funding in marginal seats. In the lead-up to final 12 months’s election, she says, either side of politics had develop into “hyper-vigilant”.

“Obviously, it didn’t stop them doing it, but it meant that there was some sunlight around it,” Martin says. “They were more on guard about that ending up being the issue, weighing that up against the benefit of the pork barrelling itself.

“And all those clubs that missed out who had good projects were right to be annoyed at the government. You can’t underestimate that grassroots reaction of feeling ripped off.”

Guardian Australia was tracking 2022’s election commitments “pretty much in real time”, an enormous quantity of labor that drilled into small and marginal seats.

This work revealed that among the grant recipients within the sports activities rorts saga received even more funding within the lead-up to the election.

“I don’t know whether we would have had the resources to do that had all of this not preceded it,” Martin says. “We recognised it as an area of priority and of scrutiny.”

The findings weren’t stunning – either side have been nonetheless favouring marginal seats – simply not fairly so blatantly.

“I remember an old mentor of mine saying: ‘Every seat in the country should be marginal,’” Martin says. “That’s the only way around this.

“It’s unfortunately not the case. But maybe it should be.”

• To have fun our birthday, we’re holding a particular night for supporters with Guardian editors and journalists. You can buy tickets here