It will not be improper to say that tempting packets of chips and wafers have all the time made our eyes glow. During our college days, strolling previous a neighborhood store, it was exhausting not to have a look at these treats and plead our moms to purchase us some. Feeling nostalgic, proper? The snacks would all the time depart us asking for extra given the scrumptious style they provide. But, one thought that has crossed our minds sooner or later is how a lot chips will we get for the worth we pay. An individual just lately tried to analyse it and shared the outcomes on Reddit. In images of the experiment, the particular person exhibits a packet of Kurkure Solid Masti Twisteez, which is priced at Rs 10, and pours it right into a bowl. He then measures the burden of the chips utilizing an digital scale, which seems to be 24 grams.

Now, it is time for the decision. In the subsequent image, the particular person turns across the packet to indicate that the online weight of the snacks is 25 grams. It can be seen that the chips value Rs 0.40 per gram, implying that there have been much less chips within the packet than there ought to have been.

“What 10 Rupees Kurkure Solid Masti gives you,” the caption learn.

Also Read: Viral Video: Bangalore-Based Amma Sells Idlis And Dosas For Rs. 5; Internet Is Moved By Her Story

The publish resonated with many on the platform and drew varied reactions.

“So that’s just 1 gram of air. 24 grams of Kurkure. Myth debunked,” a person wrote.

“Are you showing off your new scale to us? Everyone knows you pay Kurkure for the packaged air, certainly not the food,” a remark learn.

One particular person requested, “Are you mad about 1g missing?”

“Try Haldiram’s soya sticks. Tastes better and also has more quantity,” a person prompt.

An individual stated, “If this is surprising to you, then I will recommend you to stay away from Lay’s”.

“Some 4-5 years ago the quantity of solid masti was much greater than now (as much as I can remember),” one other wrote.

So, what are your ideas on it?