The Criminal Procedure (Identification) Bill authorising the gathering, storage and evaluation of organic samples, biometrics and bodily measurements of convicts, arrested individuals and people in preventive detention is let down by unhealthy drafting. The Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920, which the Bill seeks to exchange restricts itself to finger/foot prints of arrested individuals and their storage just for convicted individuals, wanted an improve. Agencies like FBI have moved on to superior biometrics. And such information definitely has crime-fighting makes use of.

But this constructive intent is defeated by the Bill’s provisions. Take the carte blanche to cops in pattern assortment. While these arrested for offences carrying lower than seven years imprisonment or not going through sexual crimes towards girls or kids can refuse to provide samples, precise policing in India hardly ever offers such leeway to atypical residents to withhold their consent. With computing energy not a finite phenomenon, information assortment eased by handheld gadgets, and all state governments competing to construct multidimensional databases, there could also be no holding again the thana cop. A greater legislative design would have inverted the method to mandate cops to safe a Justice of the Peace’s order to gather samples.

Lumping these in preventive detention, who’re primarily held on apprehension of breach of public order even earlier than committing any act of criminality, with convicts and people arrested for main offences, has rightly irked opposition parliamentarians. Centre mustn’t see this as the same old pushback towards something it proposes; India has a protracted historical past of state governments utilizing police departments to hound opponents. The Bill has merely not offered sufficient checks and balances to forestall abuse of its provisions by police to harass or implicate harmless individuals. Also, it neither dwells on unauthorised entry to saved information by hacking, nor on misuse of information by the police.

Even doubtful strategies like narco-analysis, which the Supreme Court dominated inadmissible as proof, or prone-to-abuse facial recognition can change into commonplace. The Bill’s definition of “measurements” surpasses biometrics and organic information to supply a large berth for “any other examination referred to in Section 53 and 53A of Criminal Procedure Code”. These two CrPC sections are, in flip, loosely worded to permit for “such other tests which a registered medical practitioner thinks necessary”.

Finally, whereas the Bill’s wager on large information to extend conviction fee is comprehensible, there’s no authorities motion on bolstering fundamentals like extra forensic amenities. In 2019, solely 27% of India’s cops reported all the time gaining access to forensic know-how at thanas. And courts throughout India bemoan delays attributable to too few forensic science labs.

END OF ARTICLE