The lions look bemused and even bored in photographs however not sad. Sita and Akbar had been residing collectively for years. Now in a captive-breeding program in India’s japanese state of West Bengal, they’re as married as animals may be.

But lots of the people round them are upset. On Saturday, the authorities suspended a high-ranking forestry official who had overseen the animals for naming the lioness Sita, after a revered Hindu goddess, and her mate Akbar, after a medieval Muslim emperor.

Amid an environment of heightened non secular and political tensions between Hindus and Muslims within the nation, the lions’ names drew an outcry. Lakshman Bansal, an official of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, a far-right group linked to India’s governing Bharatiya Janata Party, mentioned that when he learn the lions’ names in a Bengali newspaper it “felt provocative.”

“It is blasphemy,” Mr. Bansal mentioned by phone. “And an assault on religious beliefs of millions of Hindus.”

The Asiatic lions, together with different animals like spectacled langurs, two leopards and 4 Indian antelopes, had been transferred to the Bengal Safari park from the close by state of Tripura early this month.

Indian zoos have a protracted custom of naming animals, notably tigers and different nice cats, after warriors, kings and mythological figures. A cheetah within the central state of Madhya Pradesh is known as Agni, for an historic god of fireside. At zoos throughout the nation, wildlife officers mentioned there have been many different cats named after Sita and Akbar, who’re among the many hottest figures in Indian delusion and historical past. Such names assist enhance the animals’ recognition amongst youngsters and adults alike.

Heightened sensitivities between Hindus and Muslims are taking part in a task within the animal-naming dispute. Since Jan. 22, when Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated an enormous temple to the god Ram in Ayodhya, members of Mr. Bansal’s V.H.P. group have been celebrating it as their very own victory. In 1992, they led a mob that destroyed a Mughal-era mosque that had stood the place the brand new temple was constructed.

The real-life Akbar was not solely a Muslim however had Central Asian roots and took wives of various religions, together with a Hindu princess. Present-day right-wing Hindu activists have campaigned in opposition to interreligious marriage, accusing Indian Muslim males of attempting to woo, marry and convert Hindu ladies.

Mr. Bansal mentioned that after he learn the information, he instantly wrote a letter to forestry officers in West Bengal. When he did not get a response, he went to courtroom to file a petition to demand, on behalf of training Hindus around the globe, that the title of the feminine lion be modified.

The case was initially introduced earlier than a decide, who expressed shock and requested the petitioners’ lawyer if he was speaking about land.

“No, your lordship, of lion, lion,” the lawyer mentioned with emphasis.

“Lion!” the decide mentioned. “So you have challenged the naming of the lion,” the decide continued. At a sure level, he requested: “But how does it matter?”

Mr. Bansal’s legal professionals argued that lions named Akbar and Sita may set a harmful precedent: “Tomorrow, a donkey may be named after some deity.”

Whether the courtroom was satisfied of the danger of a slippery slope, it concluded days later that there was no justification for the large cats’ names and requested officers of the West Bengal authorities if they’d contemplate altering them.

And the courtroom went a step additional. At a listening to, Justice Saugata Bhattacharya mentioned, “Sita is worshiped by a larger section of this country. I also oppose naming the lion after Akbar. He was an efficient, successful and secular Mughal emperor.”

Under strain, the state authorities in Tripura, the place the animals had been named earlier than being transferred to Bengal, determined to research how the names happened. Its officers quickly discovered references to Akbar and Sita in information. The official suspended on Saturday, Prabin Lal Agrawal, had denied selecting the names.

Some individuals took to social media to name the state of affairs absurd. One mentioned it set “a mockable precedent” and one other mentioned she at first thought it was “a joke shared from a parody account.”

Shubhankar Dutta, a lawyer representing Mr. Bansal and different petitioners, mentioned the following listening to was scheduled for early March and he would love justices to concern directives to zoo officers to cease naming cats and tigers after non secular figures, a minimum of in West Bengal.